Comparison of Visual Outcomes After Implantation of the POD FT and the POD F
NCT ID: NCT04943809
Last Updated: 2021-07-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
63 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-07-16
2017-07-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study will be a prospective non-randomised controlled study. The target is then to determine the equivalence in the glare. Assumption of Type I error is p=0.05 as level of significance and Type II error is alpha=0.8 as power.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Viusal Outcomes After Implantation of the POD 26% FineVision Toric (PhysIOL) and POD 26% Toric (PhysIOL)
NCT02426385
Comparison of Visual Outcomes After Implantation of the POD AY GF F (PhysIOL) and the POD AY 26P F (PhysIOL)
NCT02981186
Clinical Outcomes of MICROPURE and PodEye Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
NCT03796624
Clinical Investigation of the Multifocal IOL POD F GF in Cataracteous Eyes
NCT04699266
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes POD L GF vs POD F GF (PHY1707)
NCT03688399
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We used the 'TrialSize' package of the R software. Here are the parameters defined for the sample size calculation:
1. Alpha: 0.05
2. Power : 0.90
3. Two sided test
4. Equal group allocation
5. Standard deviation for the two groups (POD 26P AY F et POD 26P AY FT) equal to 0.10
6. Expected mean for the two groups (POD 26P AY F et POD 26P AY FT) equal to 0.89 (true difference between the means equal 0)
7. An equivalence limit of 0.05, 0.10 and 0.15 Equivalence limit: 0.15 In order to show no difference between these two groups, 12 patients by groups are needed. With a drop-out of 15%, we obtain 30 patients (15 patients by group) to recruit in order to obtain 24 valuable patients.
Equivalence limit: 0.10 In order to show no difference between these two groups, 26 patients by groups are needed. With a drop-out of 15%, we obtain 62 patients (31 patients by group) to recruit in order to obtain 52 valuable patients.
This total number of subjects with such requirement is 26 patients in each group.
Group 1 will be made of 26 patients with corneal astigmatism higher than 1.0D in both eyes and lower than 2.5D and will be implanted with the POD 26P AY FT and Group 2 will be made of 26 patients with corneal astigmatism lower than 1.0D in both eyes.
Interim analysis after the 12th patient of each group will have completed the last follow-up will be achieved to confirm the equivalence with the equivalence limit of 0.15.
The POD platform in 26 % (non toric version) is available since 2008 in the monofocal version and since 2012 in the toric one (POD 6P AY T, Ankoris®, PhysIOL).The so-called POD design is characterised by two symmetrical bifid haptics with opened loops that provide four points of support to ensure IOL stability in the capsular bag. The dual C-loop profile shortens the loops, thus improving the pliability of the implant during its injection through a micro-incision. These shortened loops should permit a clockwise or anticlockwise rotary motion and should facilitate the comfortable fitting of the implant orientation after unfolding without elastic-restoring torque. The double C-loop POD design offers 4 support points for the implant within the capsule and ensures its stability. The V-shape of the upper and lower haptics together with the flexibility of the implant allow the loop separation angle to be adjusted and ensure the most accurate adaptation to the capsular bag size. A finite element structural analysis of the implant showed that the elasticity at the distal part of the loop prevents the constraints from being transmitted onto the optical portion of the implant. The trifocal optic is associated to the POD platform and is made of 26 % raw material.
The rotational stability of this non toric version has been clinically investigated on 117 consecutive eyes 1 week, 3 weeks, 3 and 12 months after implantation. The absolute rotation of the lens averaged 2.5 ± 2.6°. The position of the center of the implant relative to the pupillary center expressed by a vector was 0.01 mm at 70°.
The investigational product (POD 26P AY FT) is CE labeled since January 2014. Main IOL features are:
* Biconvex toric aspheric (-0.11um SA) blue-blocking, hydrophilic acrylic IOL with 26% equlibrium water content, implantable through ≥ 2.2mm incision.
* 4-point haptic design
* 6 mm of optical diameter / 11.4 mm of total diameter
* Dioptric range (SE): 6 to 35 D by 0.5 D increments
* Cylinders at the IOL plane: 1, 1.5, 2.25, 3, 3.75, 4.5, 5.25, 6 D
* Addition +1.75D / +3.5 D
The control product (POD 26P AY F) is CE labeled since 2010. Main IOL features are:
* Biconvex, aspheric (-0.11um SA) blue-blocking, hydrophilic acrylic IOL with 26% equlibrium water content, implantable through ≥ 2.2mm incision.
* 4-point haptics design which minimizes decentration and optimizes the rotational stability
* 6 mm of optical diameter / 11.4 mm of total diameter
* Dioptric range (SE): 6 to 35 D by 0.5 D increments
* Addition +1.75D / +3.5 D
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
POD 26P AY FT
26 patients with corneal astigmatism higher than 1.0D in both eyes and lower than 2.5D and will be implanted with the POD 26P AY FT
POD 26P AY FT
Routine cataract surgery
POD 26P AY F
26 patients with corneal astigmatism lower than 1.0D in both eyes will be implanted with the POD 26P AY F
POD 26P AY F
Routine cataract surgery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
POD 26P AY FT
Routine cataract surgery
POD 26P AY F
Routine cataract surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Preoperative Corneal astigmatism \< 0.75 D
* Age 21 and older
* Visual Acuity \> 0.05
* Normal findings in the medical history and physical examination unless the investigator considers an abnormality to be clinically irrelevant.
* Patient willing multifocal implantation and with realistic expectations.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous ocular surgery or trauma.
21 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Beaver-Visitec International, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Francisco Poyales Galan, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CEIC Hospital Clinical San Carlos
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Madrid, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chassain C, Pagnoulle C, Gobin L, Rozema J. [Evaluation of a new intraocular lens platform: centration and rotational stability]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2013 Apr;36(4):336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2012.04.012. Epub 2013 Jan 24. French.
Visser N, Bauer NJ, Nuijts RM. Toric intraocular lenses: historical overview, patient selection, IOL calculation, surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Apr;39(4):624-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.02.020.
de Vries NE, Nuijts RM. Multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: literature review of benefits and side effects. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Feb;39(2):268-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.12.002.
Wolffsohn JS, Jinabhai AN, Kingsnorth A, Sheppard AL, Naroo SA, Shah S, Buckhurst P, Hall LA, Young G. Exploring the optimum step size for defocus curves. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Jun;39(6):873-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.031.
Sheppard AL, Shah S, Bhatt U, Bhogal G, Wolffsohn JS. Visual outcomes and subjective experience after bilateral implantation of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Mar;39(3):343-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.09.017. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
Cochener B, Vryghem J, Rozot P, Lesieur G, Heireman S, Blanckaert JA, Van Acker E, Ghekiere S. Visual and refractive outcomes after implantation of a fully diffractive trifocal lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:1421-7. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S32343. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
Roensch MA, Charton JW, Blomquist PH, Aggarwal NK, McCulley JP. Resident experience with toric and multifocal intraocular lenses in a public county hospital system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 May;38(5):793-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.11.043. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
Visser N, Nuijts RM, de Vries NE, Bauer NJ. Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after cataract surgery with toric multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Nov;37(11):2034-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.041. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
Bellucci R, Bauer NJ, Daya SM, Visser N, Santin G, Cargnoni M, Nuijts RM; Lisa Toric Study Group. Visual acuity and refraction with a diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Oct;39(10):1507-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.04.036.
Alfonso JF, Knorz M, Fernandez-Vega L, Rincon JL, Suarez E, Titke C, Kohnen T. Clinical outcomes after bilateral implantation of an apodized +3.0 D toric diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Jan;40(1):51-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.06.026.
Ferreira TB, Marques EF, Rodrigues A, Montes-Mico R. Visual and optical outcomes of a diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Jul;39(7):1029-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.02.037. Epub 2013 May 13.
Knorz MC, Rincon JL, Suarez E, Alfonso JF, Fernandez-Vega L, Titke C, Kohnen T, Tucker S. Subjective outcomes after bilateral implantation of an apodized diffractive +3.0 D multifocal toric IOL in a prospective clinical study. J Refract Surg. 2013 Nov;29(11):762-7. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20131021-06.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Poyales/POD FT - POD F
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.