Analysis of Influencing Factors of Gastric Preparation Quality for MCCG
NCT ID: NCT04933643
Last Updated: 2023-02-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
240 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-06-22
2023-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Usage of Soda-Water in Gastric Preparation for Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy
NCT04479423
Magnetic Steering Enhance Capsule Gastroscopy Gastric Emptying
NCT03441945
Repetitive Position Change Improves Gastric Cleanliness for MCE
NCT03514966
Study of the Feasibility of Magnetic Navigated Capsule Endoscope in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Examination
NCT02886338
Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy in Visualization of the UGI and Small Intestine
NCT05069233
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
well prepared
GCS was the total scores of all six land-marks, ranging from 6 (completely unprepared) to 24 (perfect). We define that the stomach is well prepared when GCS ≥ 18
inadequate prepared
GCS was the total scores of all six land-marks, ranging from 6 (completely unprepared) to 24 (perfect). We define that GCS \< 18 is inadequate.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* sign informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* patients with severe somatic diseases unable to complete examination
* known active upper gastrointestinal bleeding
* previous history of upper digestive tract or abdominal surgery to change
* gastrointestinal anatomy
* patients with cardiac pacemakers or implanted with other electronic medical
* instruments and magnetic metal foreign bodies
* pregnant women
* claustrophobia or other mental disorders uncontrollable
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shandong University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yanqing Li
Vice president of QiLu Hospital
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Li Yanqing
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Qilu Hospital, Shandong University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University
Jinan, Shandong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020SDU-QILU-072
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.