Surface Texture and Clinical Performance of Milled BioHPP Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Single Posterior Crowns Veneered With Two Different Techniques
NCT ID: NCT04922372
Last Updated: 2021-06-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
26 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-22
2022-12-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
For patients requiring posterior single crowns, does the use of Milled BioHPP PEEK copings veneered with CAD/CAM composite resin offer better surface texture and clinical performance when compared Milled BioHPP PEEK copings veneered with manual layering?
Statement of the problem Nowadays, metal free restorations are widely used. PEEK is one among these restorations that has many applications in dental field. Owing to PEEK's excellent mechanical properties, it is gaining popularity in prosthodontics. The opaque nature of PEEK allows its use as a framework material in fixed prosthodontics and composite resin material is used as a veneering material to achieve aesthetics .
The compatible composite veneering material can be manufactured by both manual and CAD/CAM techniques. Yet, there is no enough research regarding the influence of the veneering technique on the surface texture and clinical performance of these restorations.
Rationale PEEK combination of mechanical properties and high biocompatibility make it a very promising material . PEEK based crowns are veneered by composite resin material. Among the methods of fabrication of veneering composite is the manual layering and CAD/CAM techniques . The surface flaws and internal defects determine the strength of the material and affects its performance . Accordingly the evaluation of the veneering technique is mandatory.
The rationale for carrying out this study lies in providing an alternative solution to the manual veneering technique, which will, in-turn, provide better surface properties and clinical performance of the restoration and accordingly increase its longevity.
Aim of the study:
\- The aim of this study is to evaluate the surface texture and clinical performance of milled BioHPP PEEK veneered with CAD/CAM composite resin and compare them to milled BioHPP PEEK veneered manually.
Null hypothesis:
There is no difference in the surface texture and clinical performance between milled BioHPP PEEK veneered with CAD/CAM composite resin and milled BioHPP PEEK veneered manually.
Primary objective:
* Primary outcome: (surface texture) of the two groups will be assessed using the modified USPHS.
* Secondary outcome: (fracture) of the two groups will be assessed using the modified Ryge criteria.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Different Types of Crowns on Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Assesment
NCT02929173
Evaluation of Bioactive Giomer Material Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Deep Marginal Elevation
NCT06497231
One Year Clinical Evaluation of New Gradient Technology Monolithic Zirconia (5Y-TZP/3Y-TZP) Crowns in Dental Esthetic Zone With Vertical Versus Conventional Preparation Techniques
NCT04738513
Surface Roughness of Heat Cured Acrylic Resin Versus Acrylic Resin With Titanium Dioxide
NCT02950584
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Indirect Pulp Capping Using Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Deep Carious Molars: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06889363
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
intervention arm copping veneered with composite resin
peek
After tooth preparation, adequate 2ry Impression using non aqueous elastomeric impression materials and bite registration will be taken. 5. Fabrication of the temporary restoration using composite resin temporary material and cemented using non Eugenol Zinc Oxide temporary cement. 11.a.iii. Fabrication and cementation of restoration: Bio-HPP will be supplied in the form of discs to fabricate crown core by CAD/CAM technology then veneered with two veneering techniques; the CAD/ CAM and the manual technique using the visio.lign system of appropriate shade. The finished Bio HPP crown will be cemented by adhesive resin cement according to manufacturer instruction
control arm copping veneered with manual layering
peek
After tooth preparation, adequate 2ry Impression using non aqueous elastomeric impression materials and bite registration will be taken. 5. Fabrication of the temporary restoration using composite resin temporary material and cemented using non Eugenol Zinc Oxide temporary cement. 11.a.iii. Fabrication and cementation of restoration: Bio-HPP will be supplied in the form of discs to fabricate crown core by CAD/CAM technology then veneered with two veneering techniques; the CAD/ CAM and the manual technique using the visio.lign system of appropriate shade. The finished Bio HPP crown will be cemented by adhesive resin cement according to manufacturer instruction
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
peek
After tooth preparation, adequate 2ry Impression using non aqueous elastomeric impression materials and bite registration will be taken. 5. Fabrication of the temporary restoration using composite resin temporary material and cemented using non Eugenol Zinc Oxide temporary cement. 11.a.iii. Fabrication and cementation of restoration: Bio-HPP will be supplied in the form of discs to fabricate crown core by CAD/CAM technology then veneered with two veneering techniques; the CAD/ CAM and the manual technique using the visio.lign system of appropriate shade. The finished Bio HPP crown will be cemented by adhesive resin cement according to manufacturer instruction
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. From 18-50 years old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document.
2. Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations.
3. Psychologically and physically able to withstand conventional dental procedures.
4. Patients in a need for posterior crown.
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Kamal Ibrahim Hassan
principal investigator
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
261020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.