Development and Application of a Novel Digital Array PCR for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
NCT ID: NCT04920188
Last Updated: 2024-07-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
10 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-05-28
2024-05-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants: Adult patients (18 years of age or older) with diagnosed AML who are going to undergo stem cell transplant (SCT).
Procedures (methods): A total of 10 eligible subjects will be treated per standard of care with SCT. Peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate (10 mL each) for digital array assay analysis will be collected along with routine lab draws and bone marrow biopsy procedures prior to SCT. Beginning 1 month after SCT peripheral blood (10 ml) will be collected to assess MRD by digital array assay analysis on a monthly basis for up to 6 months. In addition, bone marrow aspirate will be collected at approximately Month 3 and 6 following SCT for assay analysis. Patient medical records will be reviewed 6 and 12 months after completing their last MRD follow up assessment to confirm survival status, remission status, and gather information related to relapse.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pilot Evaluation of a Microfluidic Assay to Detect Minimal Residual Disease and Predict Relapse in AML Patients
NCT03488862
Leukemia Stem Cell Detection in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT02927938
Biomarkers in Samples From Adult Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Failed Existing Standard-of-Care Treatment
NCT01421862
Studying DNA in Blood and Bone Marrow Samples From Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT01024127
Biomarkers in Samples of Bone Marrow From Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT01290107
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Currently, methods for MRD assessment in AML include flow cytometry for the detection of aberrant immunophenotypes as well as molecular PCR- and next generation sequencing (NGS)-based assays for detecting recurrent AML-associated genetic abnormalities. Both flow and molecular MRD assessment have much higher sensitivity than morphologic assessment alone, with flow cytometry having a lower limit of detection between 10-4 to 10-5 and molecular methods between 10-3 for NGS methods to 10-5 for PCR-based methods. Each of the current methods have major limitations that prevent broader adoption in AML. Standard NGS-based methods have insufficient sensitivity and high costs. Flow cytometry is a technically difficult method that is challenging to standardize, and a subset of AML cases do not have sufficient evaluable surface markers to allow detection. PCR-based methods can be very sensitive, but each assay currently targets a single recurrent genetic abnormality (e.g., PML/RARA fusion in acute promyelocytic leukemia), and many AML cases do not have genetic abnormalities that are targeted by current clinical assays. In contrast, the daPCR technology we propose to apply in this study provides a high throughput, multiplexed platform (24-96 variants) with unprecedented dynamic range (\>108), high ease of use, low cost and rapid turnaround time. Because the daPCR can simultaneously probe for multiple variants, we estimate that our initial assay will have the potential to detect and quantify the abundance of at least one AML associated mutation in \~80% of AML samples. This technological advance would provide a real-world solution to enable frequent, deep monitoring of therapeutic response in patients with AML.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects must have an identified mutation that has been validated on the multiplex daPCR assay.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paul Armistead, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UNC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
North Carolina Cancer Hospital (NCCH)
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Clinical Trials
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LCCC 2103
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.