Interest of Nasal Provocation Tests for Diagnosis of House Mites Allergic Rhinitis
NCT ID: NCT04915352
Last Updated: 2024-08-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
8 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-07
2024-07-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sensitivity and Specificity of Nasal Provocation Test in Allergic Rhinitis to House Dust Mites
NCT01485523
A Study to Investigate an Immunomodulatory Therapy in Adult Patients With Perennial Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
NCT00574223
Local IgE in Subjects With Allergic or Non-allergic Rhinitis
NCT02810535
Intratonsillar Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis
NCT06523478
Multicenter Trial of Immunotherapy With House Dust Mite Allergoid
NCT00540631
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Currently, the diagnostic approach is based on the history, which collects the symptoms reported by patients during a possible allergen exposure and on the results of skin tests (CT) and / or specific IgE assays (IgEs), which confirm biological sensitization.
In a recent retrospective study, the positive predictive value of TCs and IgEs is estimated at 77% for D. pteronyssinus and 69% for D. farinae. Approximately 30% of patients who have TCs and / or IgEs directed against mites therefore only have biological sensitization.
The nasal challenge test (NPT) has been shown to be an effective tool in improving the diagnosis of dust mite allergic rhinitis. The RNTP is easy to perform, consisting of the nasal spraying of 3 solutions of increasing concentrations (50; 500 and 5000 SBE / ml). RNTP demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity (83.7% and 100%) as well as identical safety in use compared to "classic" TPN. But its real impact on the diagnostic and above all therapeutic strategy has not yet been assessed.
The hypothesis is that RNTP has a positive predictive value superior to TC and IgEs for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis to dust mites and therefore for the efficacy of ITA.
To demonstrate this, the investigators propose to compare the diagnostic values of these 3 tests, taking the efficacy of ITA at 1 year as the gold standard. The expected results are better predictive values for RNTP, and therefore the possibility of avoiding unnecessary treatments for the patients concerned. About 30% of patients could be treated wrongly now, with the use of TCs and IgEs alone.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Adult dust mite allergenic rhinitis patients
Nasal Provocation Test administration (725 Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (5.000 SBE/ml) dosage form: Lyophilisate and solvent for nasal drops, suspension dosage and frequency: 3 nasal sprays at 3 different concentrations per year: 50, 500 and 5000 SBE / ml for 3 years Duration: 36 months
Nasal provocation test - 725 Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus
3 different concentrations of Nasal Provocation Test are administered to patients:
* Nasal spray at 50 SBE/ml for 36 months
* Nasal spray at 500 SBE/ml for 36 months
* Nasal spray at 5000 SBE/ml for 36 months
Negative control
Negative control using only solvent is applied in order to consider a non-specific nasal hyper reactivity.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nasal provocation test - 725 Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus
3 different concentrations of Nasal Provocation Test are administered to patients:
* Nasal spray at 50 SBE/ml for 36 months
* Nasal spray at 500 SBE/ml for 36 months
* Nasal spray at 5000 SBE/ml for 36 months
Negative control
Negative control using only solvent is applied in order to consider a non-specific nasal hyper reactivity.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient with persistent mild to severe or moderate to severe intermittent rhinitis according to ARIA criteria, suspicion of allergic rhinitis to dust mites, and a positive skin test for mites and / or a positive mite specific IgE assay
* Patient having signed a free and informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients under guardianship or curatorship
* Patients under legal protection
* Patients not affiliated to a social security scheme
* Contraindications to performing a RNPT
* Active ENT or respiratory infections.
* Allergy in acute phase
* History of anaphylaxis due to the allergen involved.
* Unstabilized asthma and other obstructive pathologies.
* Severe general illnesses in evolution.
* Hypersensitivity to one of the components of the product
* Simultaneous treatment with beta-blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors,
* Presence of an excessive degree of sensitization (e.g. history, excessive skin reactions),
* Contraindications to immunotherapy:
* Asthma (uncontrolled) or severe \[FEV \< 70% of the theorical value (after appropriate drug treatment) at the beginning of the treatment\].
* Severe asthma exacerbation in the last 3 months
* Active autoimmune diseases
* Malignant tumors
* Pregnancy (initiation of venereal disease)
* AIDS
* Treatment with beta-blockers, including eye drops
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
OTHER
Centre Hospitalier de Verdun
OTHER
CHU de Reims
OTHER
Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sébastien LEFEVRE, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHR Metz Thionville Hopital de Mercy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHR Metz Thionville/Hopital de Mercy
Metz, Grand Est, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018-000597-29
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.