Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
42 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-07-01
2019-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Exploratory Clinical Study Non-invasive Monitoring of Cardiac Outputs
NCT05734664
Accuracy of Pulse Pressure Variation and of Pleth Variability Index to Predict the Response to a Fluid Challenge
NCT02040948
Simplified Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Septic Shock Patients
NCT04963686
Pulmonary Artery Catheterization and Carvedilol Early Initiation in Cardiogenic SHOCK Due to HFrEF
NCT06078436
Electrical Cardiometry Compared to Transthoracic Echocardiography in Fluid Responsiveness in Sepsis
NCT03938220
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Measurements will be performed contemporaly with both devices every 4 hours and all clinical and hemodynmaic parameters will be recorded, including but not limited to central venous pressure, wege pressure, mechanical ventilation pressures, blood pressures, volume balance as well as vasoaktive medikation doses. This precise evaluation shall serve to evaluate the precision of the ProAQT to estimate the cardiac index under different clinical situation in the intensive care unit. A precision difference of below 30% between both methods will be regarded as clinically irrelevant, suggesting equipoise between both methods.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ICU Patients with PAC
All patients admitted to the Medical ICU of the University Hospital Zürich, complying with the inclusion criteria and monitored by a pilmonary artery catheter
Measurement of the Cardiac Output/ Cardiac Index
Semiinvasive Measurement of the Cardiac Output/ Cardiac Index with the Pulsion device
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Measurement of the Cardiac Output/ Cardiac Index
Semiinvasive Measurement of the Cardiac Output/ Cardiac Index with the Pulsion device
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Above 16 years of age
* At least 36 hours of continuous hemodynamic monitoring with the pulmonary artery catheter planed
Exclusion Criteria
* Permanent or pesisting Atrial Fibrilation or Ventricular Arrythmias
* Moderate to Severe Aortic Insuficiency or Aortic Stenosis
* Intravascular Cardiac Assist Device
* Planed removal of the pulmonary artery catheter \<36 hours
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Zurich
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Zurich, Medical intensive care unit
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ameloot K, Van De Vijver K, Broch O, Van Regenmortel N, De Laet I, Schoonheydt K, Dits H, Bein B, Malbrain ML. Nexfin noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring: validation against continuous pulse contour and intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution derived cardiac output in critically ill patients. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Nov 11;2013:519080. doi: 10.1155/2013/519080. eCollection 2013.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Jun;8(2):135-60. doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204.
Broch O, Carbonell J, Ferrando C, Metzner M, Carstens A, Albrecht M, Gruenewald M, Hocker J, Soro M, Steinfath M, Renner J, Bein B. Accuracy of an autocalibrated pulse contour analysis in cardiac surgery patients: a bi-center clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Nov 26;15:171. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0153-2.
Smetkin AA, Hussain A, Kuzkov VV, Bjertnaes LJ, Kirov MY. Validation of cardiac output monitoring based on uncalibrated pulse contour analysis vs transpulmonary thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jun;112(6):1024-31. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet489. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
proAQT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.