Exploration of Possible Reasons for the Discrepancy Between Expectation and Indication of Subjective Perceived Exertions
NCT ID: NCT04898296
Last Updated: 2022-10-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
16 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-07-01
2022-08-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of an Eccentric Exercise Program on Quality of Life and Function in People With Chronic Heart Failure.
NCT02223624
Effect of Evaluative Conditioning on Intensity of Physical Activity of Patients Doing Cardiac Rehabilitation
NCT06795802
Exercise Therapy to Reduce Heart Failure Symptoms; Sorting Mechanisms of Benefit
NCT03648762
The Effects of Combined Exercise Training on Exercise Capacity in Cardiac Rehabilitation
NCT01921036
Evaluation of Exercise Tolerance and Cardiac Output in Patients With Heart Failure After Intervention of Rehabilitation Program
NCT02928783
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients over 55 Years with coronary heart disease
Questionnaire and semistructured Interview 45 -60 minutes
Questionnaire, Interview
During the stay, a study visit is arranged with the patient after the 6-minute walk test has been performed. This consists of filling out the questionnaire and an interview, which lasts about 45-60 minutes. This is carried out by the investigator on at least 5 subjects. After each interview, a list of influencing factors is kept. If new aspects continue to appear in the 5th interview, the interviews are continued (up to a maximum of the 10th subject). If no new aspects appear in the interviews from number 6 onwards, the interviews are discontinued and no further patients are recruited. The conversations are recorded with an audio recording.
physical therapists working with patients with coronary heart disease
Focus group 60 -90 minutes
Focus Group
The focus group is carried out first in order to identify influencing variables that may be relevant for the interview (duration 60-90 minutes).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Questionnaire, Interview
During the stay, a study visit is arranged with the patient after the 6-minute walk test has been performed. This consists of filling out the questionnaire and an interview, which lasts about 45-60 minutes. This is carried out by the investigator on at least 5 subjects. After each interview, a list of influencing factors is kept. If new aspects continue to appear in the 5th interview, the interviews are continued (up to a maximum of the 10th subject). If no new aspects appear in the interviews from number 6 onwards, the interviews are discontinued and no further patients are recruited. The conversations are recorded with an audio recording.
Focus Group
The focus group is carried out first in order to identify influencing variables that may be relevant for the interview (duration 60-90 minutes).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients would not be able to perform a 6-minute walk test, e. g. surgery on the large joints of the lower extremities, unstable heart disease or predominant neurological symptoms.
55 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Klinik Barmelweid
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gilbert Busching
Physical Therapist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gilbert Büsching
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Klinik Barmelweid AG
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Klinik Barmelweid AG
Barmelweid, Canton of Aargau, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jehn M, Halle M, Schuster T, Hanssen H, Weis M, Koehler F, Schmidt-Trucksass A. The 6-min walk test in heart failure: is it a max or sub-maximum exercise test? Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 Oct;107(3):317-23. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1128-0. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
Pollentier B, Irons SL, Benedetto CM, Dibenedetto AM, Loton D, Seyler RD, Tych M, Newton RA. Examination of the six minute walk test to determine functional capacity in people with chronic heart failure: a systematic review. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2010 Mar;21(1):13-21.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Nationaler Verein für Qualitätsentwicklung in Spitälern und Kliniken. ANQ; Nationaler Vergleichsbericht 2018 - Kardiale Rehabilitation \[Internet\]. Messergebnisse Rehabilitation. 2018 \[zitiert 7. Dezember 2020\].
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.