Home-based Cognitive Treatment and Cognitive Impairment
NCT ID: NCT04889560
Last Updated: 2022-02-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-06-30
2024-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Case-Finding for Neurocognitive Disorders in Pavia
NCT06983119
Computerized Tests of Cognitive Decline in Presymptomatic Alzheimer's Disease
NCT04800588
Assessing Cognitive Decline at Home
NCT06704971
PRedicting the EVolution of SubjectIvE Cognitive Decline to Alzheimer's Disease With Machine Learning
NCT05569083
Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Assessment of Cognitive Functioning, Functional Autonomy, and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms.
NCT07287410
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Among non-pharmacological approaches, previous studies observed a positive effect of Cognitive Training (CT) both in healthy elderly people and patients in the early stage of neurodegenerative diseases. Moreover, the advances in the development of Information \& Communication Technologies (ICT) has prompted the possibility to develop computer-based solution for the training of cognitive functions, being able to overcome traditional-training advantages. However, some issue remain unresolved and larger randomized controlled trials are necessary to examine long-term CT effects, due to the lack of longitudinal studies. Our previous data demonstrated that CT program with CoRe software is safe and effective on cognition in patient with Parkinson Disease-Mild Cognitive Impairment, in the attempt of briefly stabilizing cognitive decline, delaying the downward trajectory. The same pattern of findings resulted when using CoRe in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and mild Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Among ICT advantages there is the fact that they offer the possibility to develop patient tailored interventions that can be easily delivered not only in-person but also remotely at patients' homes. It means that they could simplify the therapist's work in terms of the planning, design, and management of the cognitive intervention also outside from the clinical setting. However, some concerns have slowed the integration of home-based interventions into clinical practice, such as the fact that people with advanced age or cognitive deficit might have poor computer skills and difficulties managing technological devices on their own. Thus, the overall efficacy of home-based CT programs is still under debate.
In this frame, the primary goal of this single-blind randomized controlled trial is to assess whether a home-based CT (Home CoRe) could offer comparable effects (non-inferiority trial) to those of an in-person CT (CoRe). A secondary goal is to follow these effects with respect to the evolution of cognitive decline. These two interventions are evaluated also in terms of treatment adherence.
Both treatment protocols consist of 18 sessions (3 session/week, 45 minutes/day) of CT with CoRe vs HomeCoRe software (training memory and logical-executive functions).
Patients with mild dementia, early cognitive impairment (i.e., MCI and vascular cognitive impairment (VCI)), and SCI are recruited from Neuropsychology/Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Unit and Neurorehabilitation Unit of IRCCS Mondino Foundation. Patients' diagnosis is formulated on the basis of a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation (baseline cognitive assessment - T0) according to the guidelines presented in the literature. The following standardized tests assessing different domains are used:
* global cognitive function: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Montreal Overall Cognitive Assessment (MoCA);
* memory: verbal (Verbal Span; Digit Span) and spatial (Corsi's blocktapping test - CBTT) span; verbal long-term memory (Logical Memory Test immediate and delayed recall; Rey's 15-word test immediate and delayed recall); spatial long-term memory (Rey Complex Figure delayed recall - RCF-dr);
* logical-executive functions: non-verbal reasoning (Raven's Matrices 1947 - RM47); frontal functionality (Frontal Assessment Battery - FAB); semantic fluency (animals, fruits, car brands), phonological fluency (FAS);
* attention: visual selective attention (Attentive Matrices); simple speed processing and complex attention (Trail Making Test parts A - TMT A and part B - TMT B);
* visuospatial abilities: constructive apraxia Rey Complex Figure copy - RCF-copy.
The same battery is also used at follow-up visits; parallel versions are applied when available (verbal long-term memory tests), in order to avoid the learning effect. All the test scores are corrected for age, sex, and education and compared with the values available for the Italian population.
At the baseline, the cognitive reserve is assessed using Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (CRIq). The patients' functional status is assessed using Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) at the baseline and at the last follow-up visit after one year (T3). Moreover, mood is assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at the baseline and at the follow-up visits (T1, T2 and T3), while quality of life were assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) at the baseline and at the follow-up visits six months (T2) and one year (T3) after training. Subjective evaluation of intervention success is also considered by means of the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and the Patients Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS), administered at T0 and T1. Treatment adherence is evaluated considering the number of CT sessions carried out.
All the patients recruited undergo baseline cognitive assessment (T0). Patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria are enrolled and randomly assigned to the experimental group (Home CoRe) or control group (CoRe).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
Experimental group receives Home CoRe (Home CoRe Group)
Experimental group
Home-based version of a computerized cognitive training (CoRe)
Control group
Control group receives CoRe software (CoRe Group)
Control group
Computerized cognitive training (CoRe)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Experimental group
Home-based version of a computerized cognitive training (CoRe)
Control group
Computerized cognitive training (CoRe)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age between 50 and 85 years;
* educational level ≥ 5 years.
Exclusion Criteria
* CRD \> 1
* pre-existing cognitive impairment (e.g. aphasia, neglect);
* severe disturbances in consciousness;
* concomitant severe psychiatric disease or others neurological conditions (e.g. depression and behavioral disorders).
50 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stefano Cappa, Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dementia Research Center
Pavia, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, Gamst A, Holtzman DM, Jagust WJ, Petersen RC, Snyder PJ, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Phelps CH. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):270-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
Coyle H, Traynor V, Solowij N. Computerized and virtual reality cognitive training for individuals at high risk of cognitive decline: systematic review of the literature. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;23(4):335-359. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 14.
Hachinski V, Iadecola C, Petersen RC, Breteler MM, Nyenhuis DL, Black SE, Powers WJ, DeCarli C, Merino JG, Kalaria RN, Vinters HV, Holtzman DM, Rosenberg GA, Wallin A, Dichgans M, Marler JR, Leblanc GG. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards. Stroke. 2006 Sep;37(9):2220-41. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000237236.88823.47. Epub 2006 Aug 17.
Hsu WY, Ku Y, Zanto TP, Gazzaley A. Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Aug;36(8):2348-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.04.016. Epub 2015 May 1.
Lampit A, Hallock H, Valenzuela M. Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. PLoS Med. 2014 Nov 18;11(11):e1001756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756. eCollection 2014 Nov.
Livingston G, Sommerlad A, Orgeta V, Costafreda SG, Huntley J, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, Burns A, Cohen-Mansfield J, Cooper C, Fox N, Gitlin LN, Howard R, Kales HC, Larson EB, Ritchie K, Rockwood K, Sampson EL, Samus Q, Schneider LS, Selbaek G, Teri L, Mukadam N. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet. 2017 Dec 16;390(10113):2673-2734. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6. Epub 2017 Jul 20. No abstract available.
Mendonca MD, Alves L, Bugalho P. From Subjective Cognitive Complaints to Dementia: Who is at Risk?: A Systematic Review. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2016 Mar;31(2):105-14. doi: 10.1177/1533317515592331.
McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR Jr, Kawas CH, Klunk WE, Koroshetz WJ, Manly JJ, Mayeux R, Mohs RC, Morris JC, Rossor MN, Scheltens P, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Weintraub S, Phelps CH. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
Prehn K, Floel A. Potentials and limits to enhance cognitive functions in healthy and pathological aging by tDCS. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 Sep 14;9:355. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00355. eCollection 2015.
Sachdev PS, Blacker D, Blazer DG, Ganguli M, Jeste DV, Paulsen JS, Petersen RC. Classifying neurocognitive disorders: the DSM-5 approach. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Nov;10(11):634-42. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.181. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
Bernini S, Alloni A, Panzarasa S, Picascia M, Quaglini S, Tassorelli C, Sinforiani E. A computer-based cognitive training in Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;44(4):555-567. doi: 10.3233/NRE-192714.
Bernini S, Panzarasa S, Barbieri M, Sinforiani E, Quaglini S, Tassorelli C, Bottiroli S. A double-blind randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of cognitive training delivered using two different methods in mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: preliminary report of benefits associated with the use of a computerized tool. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jun;33(6):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01665-2. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
Bernini S, Panzarasa S, Sinforiani E, Quaglini S, Cappa SF, Cerami C, Tassorelli C, Vecchi T, Bottiroli S. HomeCoRe for Telerehabilitation in Mild or Major Neurocognitive Disorders: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 23;12:752830. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.752830. eCollection 2021.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Home CoRe 2021
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.