Effect of Feedback Health Education on Postoperative Rehabilitation of Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT ID: NCT04885140
Last Updated: 2021-05-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
75 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-01
2021-03-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rehabilitation in Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT05544331
The Effect of Manual Therapy on Psychological Factors and Quality of Life in Lumbal Disc Herniation Patients
NCT05804357
Effects of Health Education for Patients Received Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Surgery
NCT04120532
Rehabilitation Following Lumbar Disc Surgery
NCT00894972
Quantitative Sensory Testing and PET/CT Scanning in Assessment of Surgical Outcome for Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT03894943
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
3 Test group
(1) Implementation of the feedback method includes information transmission, patient feedback, clarification and correction, and confirmation of understanding
① Conveying health information Medical terms were transformed into plain language so that patients could easily understand the health education content. The feedback method was used to explain the pathogenesis of LDH as protrusion or degeneration of the collodium supporting the lumbar spine and rupture of the cartilage protecting the lumbar spine. The protruding collodium compresses the nerve root, leading to pain in the back and leg.
* Patient feedback After a health message was delivered, the patient was asked to repeat the information back in his own words with the following question: To make sure I'm clear, could you repeat the pathogenesis for me?
③ Educator clarification and correction If the patient had mastered the relevant information, the health education session was ended. If the patient understood some or no information, the steps were repeated, and the educator continued to explain the concept to the patient but changed the way he or she expressed it.
④ Checking understanding Finally, open questions such as the following were used to confirm the patient's understanding: Do you have any other questions? The patients were then given a chance to sort out the health information.
(2) Patients in the test group received health education according to the feedback method, and the intervention contents and time were as follows:
① One day before surgery: Health education team members provided bedside one-on-one education for patients, 15-20 min per session, twice a day. Health education manuals and other tools were used to explain information related to lumbar intervertebral disc herniation, including the pathogenesis of LDH, clinical manifestations, the significance of relevant examinations, the principle of surgical treatment, and the importance of exercising according to the guidance of doctors, to the patient. The main problem before LDH was pain in the waist and legs, so the patients were advised to take medication and taught how to take neurotropin, mecobalamine, Celebrex and other drugs.
* One week after surgery: One-on-one education on rehabilitation exercise was conducted for the patients by the health education team members, 15-20 min per session, twice a day.
Day of surgery: The main concerns of the patients were wound pain and axial rolling. After returning to the ward, the patients were taught about pain and the correct use of the analgesic pump.
One week after surgery: The main concerns of the patients were waist circumference and methods of rehabilitation exercise. Patients were instructed to perform straight leg raising exercises, ankle pump exercises and quad contraction exercises, 10\~20 times/session, 3 sessions/day. If the patient understood the relevant knowledge and completed the rehabilitation exercise, the patient was affirmed and encouraged in the form of award certificates, and the "Best Cooperation Award", "Best Progress Award", "Most Confidence Award", "Three Good Fellow Award", etc., were used to enhance the patient's self-confidence, sense of honour and sense of achievement in rehabilitation exercise. In terms of discharge guidance, patients were told to go home and continue to perform functional exercise.
③ Two to four weeks after surgery: The main concerns of patients were functional exercise and daily life activities. The health education group members guided the patients through functional rehabilitation exercises via WeChat. Each intervention lasted 20-30 min. The patients interacted once through WeChatB1, and their questions were answered at any time. Patients were instructed to perform head lifting training in the prone position, a wood rolling exercise, walking training (waist-assisted) and supine hip flexion and knee flexion exercises, 5-10 min/session, 3 sessions/day. Patients were required to sign in after receiving new exercises and give feedback. Patients were required to "send a video of themselves performing functional exercise to the group", and the health education team members corrected any incorrect movement or frequency, answered their questions, and confirmed whether they understood until they had fully mastered the correct methods for the functional exercise. WeChat pushed small pieces of information twice via a link.
④ Five to 12 weeks after surgery: the main concerns of patients were functional exercise methods, such as five-point support, and other matters needing attention. The health education group members guided patients through the functional rehabilitation exercises via WeChat. Each intervention lasted 20\~30 min, and WeChat was used for both sessions.
4 Control group: The patients underwent routine health education.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Feedback-based health education health education and Routine health education
Feedback-based health education:(1) Implementation of the feedback method includes information transmission, patient feedback, clarification and correction, and confirmation of understanding.① One day before surgery: Health education team members provided bedside one-on-one education for patients, 15-20 min per session, twice a day.
② One week after surgery: One-on-one education on rehabilitation exercise was conducted for the patients by the health education team members, 15-20 min per session, twice a day.
③ Two to four weeks after surgery: The health education group members guided the patients through functional rehabilitation exercises via WeChat. Each intervention lasted 20-30 min. The patients interacted once through WeChatB1, and their questions were answered at any time.
④ Five to 12 weeks after surgery: The health education group members guided patients through the functional rehabilitation exercises via WeChat.
Feedback-based health education
This study was approved by the Tianjin Hospital Ethics Committee, (2019082).The CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to cluster-randomised trials checklist.(Campbell et al., 2012) was used to guide reporting outcomes (File S1).Specific measures have been listed above.
Routine health education
Routine health education:
Routine health education was given to the patients, and the content of health education was the same as that of the experimental group, including the introduction of the disease, clinical manifestations, significance of examination, therapeutic principles of operative methods, psychological nursing, and postoperative rehabilitation exercise, etc. To verify the effect of health education by feedback method.
Routine health education
Routine health education was given to the patients, and the content of health education was the same as that of the experimental group, including the introduction of the disease, clinical manifestations, significance of examination, therapeutic principles of operative methods, psychological nursing, and postoperative rehabilitation exercise, etc. To verify the effect of health education by feedback method.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Feedback-based health education
This study was approved by the Tianjin Hospital Ethics Committee, (2019082).The CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to cluster-randomised trials checklist.(Campbell et al., 2012) was used to guide reporting outcomes (File S1).Specific measures have been listed above.
Routine health education
Routine health education was given to the patients, and the content of health education was the same as that of the experimental group, including the introduction of the disease, clinical manifestations, significance of examination, therapeutic principles of operative methods, psychological nursing, and postoperative rehabilitation exercise, etc. To verify the effect of health education by feedback method.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must be able to Cooperate with research
Exclusion Criteria
* People with mental system diseases.
18 Years
45 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tianjin Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fan Rong
Clinical Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fan Rong Fan Rong, master
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tianjin Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Jiangsu College of Nursing
Huai'an, Jiangsu, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Baretich M. National Quality Forum releases recommendations for safe practices. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2010 Jul-Aug;44(4):334-5. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-44.4.334. No abstract available.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Jiangsu College of Nursing
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.