An Exploration of Simulated Presence Therapy as a Formulation Based Intervention for Dementia Related Distress.
NCT ID: NCT04876911
Last Updated: 2021-05-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
13 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-06-01
2022-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Simulated Presence Therapy involves playing an audio and/or visual recording with a comforting message from a loved one to a person with dementia to reduce distress. At present, there are few studies examining its effectiveness, with some indication that Simulated Presence Therapy can benefit some people, but this outcome is not consistent. One reason for this may be due to the focus on diagnosis and symptoms in previous studies rather than 'formulation'. Formulation is an approach to healthcare that attempts to arrive at an understanding of a patient's concern(s), taking into account the views of the patient, their loved ones and other healthcare professionals, as well as psychological theory and research evidence.
This study aims to determine if Simulated Presence Therapy delivered via an iPad, when used within a formulation, reduces distress in patients with moderate to severe dementia admitted for long-term care in a care home or inpatient hospital ward. This study will also examine how user-friendly and helpful Simulated Presence Therapy was for healthcare professionals who administer it. Participants may not have the ability to provide consent; therefore, this will be obtained from the legal guardian or next of kin.
All participants will have received a formulation that identifies Simulated Presence Therapy as the preferred intervention. Their occurrence will be counted on a chart and tallied each day before and after the intervention is introduced. The healthcare staff who administer Simulated Presence Therapy will complete a questionnaire to evaluate their opinions on its user-friendliness and effectiveness. It is hoped that this study may enable service providers to better understand how to integrate Simulated Presence Therapy into healthcare services for persons with a diagnosis of dementia.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for Dementia: A Two-Armed Pragmatic Trial
NCT05860127
Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Mild Alzheimer's Patients and Their Caregivers
NCT01273272
Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for Residents With Dementia in Nursing Homes
NCT06978972
Multisensory Stimulation in Dementia.
NCT04008342
Group CST Using Zoom: A Proof of Concept Study
NCT04695743
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although formulation-based approaches are become more widespread, prescribing practices for medical treatments remains suboptimal across dementia care settings. Considering the personal, societal and economic burdens of SDB in PwD, coupled with the disadvantages of pharmacological interventions, there remains a real need to develop effective non-pharmacological, psychosocial alternatives. One such intervention is Simulated Presence Therapy (SPT).
SPT is an intervention that involves playing a video and/or audio recording of a loved one to a PwD with a reassuring message when they present with SDB. Studies examining the efficacy of SPT are sparse; however, what little research that has been conducted has highlighted its effectiveness in some instances. Thus far, studies have not explored SPT when it has been identified as a way of addressing an unmet need through a formulation-driven assessment process. Instead, it has been applied to participants within specific care settings with a symptom rather than formulation-based approach. Hence, this study will explore the efficacy of SPT as part of a formulation-driven approach, grounded in the Newcastle model.
Aim/objectives (s): The present study will aim to investigate the efficacy of SPT for SDB in PwD when it has been specifically identified via a Newcastle formulation as the preferred intervention within care homes and hospital wards operated by the National Health Service of Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHSGGC) and their associated Health and Social Care Partnerships (HSCP). The research is being conducted to fulfil part of the requirements of the Principal Investigator's Doctorate in Clinical Psychology Qualification at the University of Glasgow, and the University will therefore be an additional collaborating organisation. In terms of objectives:
* Primary Objective - Introduction of SPT will significantly reduce SDB during day-to-day activities when compared to activities without SPT.
* Secondary Objective - What is the acceptability of SPT amongst healthcare professionals that administer it?
Design: This study will employ a randomised single case experimental design (SCED) of two phases (i.e. AB) with multiple baselines. This which would involve randomly allocating PwD to a staggered baseline period (A), followed by the intervention phase (B), which would last as long as the corresponding baseline phase.
Sample: Owing to the fact that, whilst the PwD are the participants that will form the key group to answer the research question, from a technical perspective, the sample consists of multiple categories of persons. For clarity, the following terms are employed:
1. 'Participants' will refer to the PwD recruited to receive SPT.
2. 'Informants' will refer to the person who complete the two attachment/relationship questionnaires for the participant.
3. 'Recorders' will refer to non-healthcare professionals, such as family members or friends, who agree to be filmed for the SPT video.
4. 'Professionals' will refer to the care staff involved in the PwD's care who complete the staff user-experience questionnaire within this study.
5. 'Sample' will refer to all persons participating in the study (i.e. Participants, Informants, Recorders and Professionals).
The anticipated minimum sample size is 13, consisting of participants (N = 6), informants/recorders (N = 6) and professional(s) (N = 1). Recruitment will be from identified care homes and hospital wards that receive input from NHSGGC's Older Person Psychology Service (OPPS).
Measure(s):
* Dementia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS) - This is a validated multiple-choice, informant-based questionnaire, designed to categorise the severity of a patient's dementia. These categories are 'mild', 'moderate' or 'severe'.
* Measure of Attachment Adapted (MOA) - This is a measure of attachment that has been adapted by the Principal Investigator for use in the present study and to be answered by informants. Informants are asked to read three paragraphs and asked to tick which one they feel best describes the patient. There are two sections of the measure: (1) One for if the informant has known the patient before they received their diagnosis of dementia, and (2) another for if the informant knew the patient ONLY after they received a diagnosis. The informant needs to only complete one of these sections. Attachment style can then be categorised as 'secure', 'avoidant' or 'anxious/ambivalent'.
* Measure of Attachment Qualities Adapted (MAQ) - This is a multiple-choice, Likert-scale measure of attachment that has been adapted by the Principal Investigator for use in the present study and to be answered by informants. There are two sections of the measure: (1) One for if the informant has known the patient before they received their diagnosis of dementia, and (2) another for if the informant knew the patient ONLY after they received a diagnosis. The informant needs to only complete one of these sections. Attachment style can then be categorised as 'secure', 'avoidant', 'ambivalent-worry' or 'ambivalent-merger'.
* Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAT)-informed Questionnaire - This is a self-report, Likert scale questionnaire developed by the Principal Investigator based on the UTAT. The measure consists of a series of statements pertaining to the usefulness and effectiveness of SPT with respondents who administered SPT selecting how strongly they agree/disagree with each. Higher scores are indicative of greater usefulness, acceptability and/or effectiveness.
* Frequency Chart - This is a chart which is used to tally the number of dSDB exhibited by patients within a specific time period and day. These recordings are made by healthcare staff who work directly with a patient.
Procedures: The process for recruitment is as follows: where capacity to consent is retained, this will be sought from the participant; where the participant is deemed to not have capacity to consent, informed consent for will be obtained from the relevant legal guardian/next of kin; informed consent for those persons who are not healthcare professionals, but complete questionnaires and record videos for the participants, will also be obtained with regard to inclusion of their responses within the present study. Informed consent for the staff UTAT-informed questionnaire will also be obtained.
Following the recruitment process, arrangements to obtain recordings and complete the MOA and MAQ will be established collaboratively between the person recorded and NHSGGC OPPS. All participants will have already received a Newcastle formulation as part of routine care and will be randomly allocated to randomly allocated to a 14, 17 or 21-day baseline period where dSDB is tallied. Immediately once the baseline phase has concluded, the intervention phase will commence, which will last indefinitely for the participants for whom SPT is an effective intervention, although the data that will be extracted at intervention stage will be at least the length of the baseline.
The UTAT-informed questionnaire would be disseminated to professionals near the conclusion of the data collection stage.
Data Analysis: Data analysis for evaluating intervention effects in SCEDs encompasses visual inspection and statistical analysis. Visual analysis involves examining level, trend, variability, immediacy of effect, overlap, and consistency of data patterns within and between phases. Statistical analysis will involve calculation of a Baseline Corrected Tau (BC-Tau) to measure data non-overlap between the two phases (A and B). Non-overlapping data as an indicator of performance difference between phases is included in standards for evaluating SCEDs. Additionally, BC-Tau is useful in aggregating data across phases to produce an overall effect size.
Evaluation of the secondary objective will involve calculating the average score across participants on the UTAT informed questionnaire, with a higher score indicative of greater acceptability.
Ethics and safety: A number of safeguards are in place regarding sample and researcher safety with relevant policies and legislation consulted in the construction of this project. These are detailed in full within the uploaded research protocol. Applications/approvals will be sought by an Ethics committee and NHSGGC's Research and Innovation department. Approval to proceed to ethics for this project has been obtained from the University of Glasgow.
Timetable:
* May/June 2021: Ethics submission.
* June/July 2021 - December 2021: Recruitment and data collection.
* January 2022: End of data collection, data analysis and write-up.
* February-April 2022: Final report article generated.
Dissemination/application: The results of this study will provide insight into the efficacy of SPT when used as part of a formulation-driven approach to dementia care. It is anticipated that this information will enable service providers to understand how to integrate SPT in services and care pathways for PwD. Dissemination will occur once the final research article has been generated by the Principal Investigator, which will be made available on the University of Glasgow's Enlighten thesis repository for public domain access in PDF format, and possibly in a paper that will be submitted for publication.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control/Usual Care
No intervention delivered and care is provided as usual.
No interventions assigned to this group
Simulated Presence Therapy (SPT)
Participants begin to receive the SPT.
Simulated Presence Therapy
A video recording of a loved one is played (via an iPad) prior to or during periods where a participant is presenting with stressed/distressed behaviours.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Simulated Presence Therapy
A video recording of a loved one is played (via an iPad) prior to or during periods where a participant is presenting with stressed/distressed behaviours.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A resident within a care home or hospital ward setting operated by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and/or Glasgow City HSCP, Inverclyde HSCP and/or Renfrewshire HSCP.
* Persons aged ≥ 65 years.
* First language must be English.
* A diagnosis of any form of dementia within the moderate to severe stages, defined as a score of at least '19' on the validated Dementia Severity Rating Scale.
* Present with SDB as confirmed by a Newcastle formulation constructed by a psychologist with multidisciplinary input.
* Having retained the relevant cognitive faculties required to engage with audio-video technologies, including attention, recognition and communication as confirmed by a Newcastle formulation constructed by a clinical psychologist with multidisciplinary input.
For informants, inclusion requires proficiency in the English language and having known the participant before and/or after the participants diagnosis of dementia, as well as having interacted with the participant in any capacity over the previous year.
Finally, regarding professionals, inclusion involves proficiency in English language and being employed by NHSGGC and having worked directly on a regular basis with the participant at point of recruitment (i.e. once over the previous 3-month period).
Exclusion Criteria
* No relative/friend/caregiver available to be recorded.
* Significant vision and/or hearing impairments that cannot be corrected.
* Pre-existing neurological or severe psychiatric disorder (e.g. psychosis, bi-polar disorder).
* Diagnosed or suspected intellectual and developmental disability.
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Glasgow
OTHER
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Danyal A Ansari, BA, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NHSGGC and University of Glasgow
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
NHSGGC
Glasgow, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abraha I, Rimland JM, Lozano-Montoya I, Dell'Aquila G, Velez-Diaz-Pallares M, Trotta FM, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Cherubini A. Simulated presence therapy for dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 18;4(4):CD011882. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011882.pub2.
Carver, C. S. (1997). Adult attachment and personality: Converging evidence and a new measure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(8), 865-883. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297238007
Clark CM, Ewbank DC. Performance of the dementia severity rating scale: a caregiver questionnaire for rating severity in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1996 Spring;10(1):31-9.
Hazan C, Shaver P. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Mar;52(3):511-24. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.3.511.
James, I. A. (2011). Understanding behaviours in dementia that challenge. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Tible OP, Riese F, Savaskan E, von Gunten A. Best practice in the management of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2017 Aug;10(8):297-309. doi: 10.1177/1756285617712979. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
294075
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
GN21MH088
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.