Hands on vs Hands Off for Perineal Laceration

NCT ID: NCT04860102

Last Updated: 2021-12-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Perineal trauma at the time of vaginal delivery is common, and when the anal sphincter is included, these injuries can be associated with additional morbidity including incontinence, pelvic pain and sexual dysfunction. Techniques studied include hands-on vs hands-off, perineal massage, warm compresses, Ritgen maneuver, and others. It is unclear if a hands-on technique decreases the incidence of perineal trauma compared to a hands-off technique

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Different strategies have been adopted in the late first and/or second stage of labor to decrease the incidence of perineal lacerations. These strategies include not only the hands-on technique, but also warm compresses, perineal massage, the use of oil or jelly, the Ritgen maneuver and a new perineal protection device. The review by Aasheim reported a decreased risk of third- and fourth-degree lacerations in the perineal massage group (two studies, RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.94).4 This review also showed a similar reduction in third- and fourth-degree lacerations with warm compresses (two studies, RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.84), but no significant changes with use of a Ritgen maneuver. Additional reviews have evaluated delayed versus immediate pushing, with no significant difference in perineal trauma.

Regarding how the interventions may work, initially the hands-on technique was hypothesized to control the velocity of the crowning process and therefore decrease perineal trauma. Given the fact that the hands-on approach has been found to be possibly associated with more perineal lacerations instead of less, some have proposed that the harm may be caused by the hands-on approach's additional pressure resulting in some perineal ischemia. Moreover, using one intervention (e.g. hands-on) may predispose to use other interventions (e.g. episiotomy), which have themselves been proven to increase perineal trauma.

Perhaps a combination of perineal interventions, such as massage or compresses, with a hands-off approach and avoidance of episiotomy, will prove to show improved perineal outcomes. Larger studies, including evaluation specific for nulliparous subjects, are required to make definitive recommendations for management.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Perineal Tear

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

hands on

Hands-on was defined as involving one hand on the fetal head, applying pressure to control expulsion, with the other hand applying pressure on the maternal perineum

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

hands on

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hands-on was defined as involving one hand on the fetal head, applying pressure to control expulsion, with the other hand applying pressure on the maternal perineum

hands off

standard of care

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

hands on

Hands-on was defined as involving one hand on the fetal head, applying pressure to control expulsion, with the other hand applying pressure on the maternal perineum

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Singleton gestations
* Low risk pregnancies
* 37 to 42 weeks of gestations

Exclusion Criteria

* Multiple gestations
* Preterm birth
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federico II University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gabriele Saccone

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gabriele Saccone

Naples, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Trama U, Bernardi FF, Colacurci D, Saccone G, Guida M. Hands-on vs hands-off technique at the time of delivery and postpartum pelvic floor morbidity: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Jul;6(7):101383. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101383. Epub 2024 May 21. No abstract available.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38782091 (View on PubMed)

Califano G, Saccone G, Diana B, Colla Ruvolo C, Ioffredo D, Nappi C, Annella A, Gragnano E, Guida M, Zullo F, Locci M. Hands-on vs hands-off technique for the prevention of perineal injury: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Sep;4(5):100675. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100675. Epub 2022 Jun 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35697297 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13/21

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id