Case Manager Approach in Dementia Care From a Caregiver Perspective

NCT ID: NCT04845789

Last Updated: 2021-04-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-02

Study Completion Date

2021-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a qualitative study to explore opinions of family caregivers of community-dwelling people with dementia on case manager approach in dementia care. Semi-structured interviews will be used for data collection. Purposive sampling was used to recruit caregivers from Jockey Club Centre for Positive Ageing. Grounded Theory would be used for data analysis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with caregivers of community-dwelling people with dementia. Purposive sampling was used to recruit caregivers from Jockey Club Centre for Positive Ageing.

Study protocol would be explained by principal investigator (PI) to case managers in JCCPA, including aim and objectives of the study, inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria and interview questions.

Due to privacy issues, case managers in JCCPA would screen family caregivers and ask for consent to participate in the study. Contact method of caregivers would be provided to PI by JCCPA case managers upon caregivers' consent. PI would then approach caregivers to arrange online meetings and send the online consent form to them for their consideration and reference. Risks and benefits of the study and the right to withdraw from the study at any time would be explained to participants before consent form was signed by participants digitally.

Demographic data such as age, gender, education level, years of caregiving to PWD and time spent on caregiving would be collected using Google form.

All interviews were conducted through video-conferencing individually. Each interview took 30 to 45 minutes. The interviews were started with an close-ended question, such as "Do you know the special approach that JCCPA has adopted?" and "Did the staff tell you about it at admission?", followed up by open-ended questions such as "What do you know about case management?" and "Can you tell me how your caregiving experience was with case manager support?". Subsequent probing questions aimed at clarification and gaining more insight on their experience, was guided by the participant's responses.

Demographic data such as age, gender, education level, years of caregiving to PWD and time spent on caregiving would be collected using Google form.

All interviews were conducted through video-conferencing individually. Each interview took 30 to 45 minutes. The interviews were started with an close-ended question, such as "Do you know the special approach that JCCPA has adopted?" and "Did the staff tell you about it at admission?", followed up by open-ended questions such as "What do you know about case management?" and "Can you tell me how your caregiving experience was with case manager support?". Subsequent probing questions aimed at clarification and gaining more insight on their experience, was guided by the participant's responses. Video-conferencing software such as Zoom, Google Meet, or facetime would be used for online interview. Interview would be conducted in JCCPA to ensure privacy of the participants.

All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcript were validated by re-listening to the tapes.

Constant comparative analysis was used for coding and category development. Incidents were identified in the data and coded. Initially, codes were identified as much as possible. Codes were compared to others codes. Codes were then collapsed into categories. In this process, incidents in a category were compared with previous incidents. New data was compared with data obtained earlier during the analysis phases. In intermediate coding, basic data was transformed into more abstract concepts allowing the theory to emerge from the data. Then, advanced coding was done to facilitate integration of the final grounded theory.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dementia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Family caregivers

Family caregivers who were main caregiver to the person with dementia and who spent at least 10 hours a week providing care to the person with dementia.

Non-interventional

Intervention Type OTHER

Non-interventional. Interview would be conducted for data collection.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Non-interventional

Non-interventional. Interview would be conducted for data collection.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* care recipients having clinical diagnosis of dementia of any stage
* participants being the family caregivers of care recipients, providing care for at least 10 hours per week
* caregivers receiving case manager support for at least 3 months

Exclusion Criteria

* caregivers who were under age of 18 and those exhibiting intellectual impairment
* caregivers who were not immediate family members of care recipients
* caregivers who could not communicate in Cantonese or English
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jockey Club Centre for Positive Ageing

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lui Kam Yan

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kam Yan Lui, Miss

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jockey Club Centre for Positive Ageing

Shatin, NT, Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Kam Yan Lui, Miss

Role: CONTACT

+85263329630

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Andrew Cheung, Mr

Role: primary

+85253456773

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CaseManagerDementiaGT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.