Effectiveness of Strength-based Intervention for Elderly With Dementia Living in the Community
NCT ID: NCT07037550
Last Updated: 2025-06-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
272 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-07-01
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Rooted in the Roy Adaptation Model and Zimmer's Theory of Psychological Empowerment, the investigator team has developed the empowerment-based dyadic strength-based intervention, which integrates strength-based and empowerment methodologies. Emphasizing a shift from deficits to capabilities, the strength-based approach fosters awareness of collective strengths within care dyads, facilitating coping mechanisms and resilience in the face of cognitive afflictions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dyadic Tailored Home-Based Activity Program for Mild-to-Moderate Dementia Patients Post-Discharge
NCT07081750
Dual-task Training to Prevent Cognitive Decline in Community-dwelling Older Adults: A Pilot Pragmatic RCT
NCT06648707
Effects of Dual-Task Training In Individuals With Alzheimer
NCT05765552
Empowerment Intervention for Persons With Young Onset Dementia
NCT02937883
Cognitive Stimulation in Older Adults With Alzheimer's Disease
NCT07041008
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Rooted in the Roy Adaptation Model and Zimmer's Theory of Psychological Empowerment, the investigator team has developed the empowerment-based dyadic strength-based intervention, which integrates strength-based and empowerment methodologies. Emphasizing a shift from deficits to capabilities, the strength-based approach fosters awareness of collective strengths within care dyads, facilitating coping mechanisms and resilience in the face of cognitive afflictions.
The objective of this study is:
1. To study the effectiveness of ambassador-led strength-based intervention for patient-participants with dementia living in the community and residential units to enhance their quality of life;
2. To compare how the involvement of young-old volunteers in the strength-based intervention enhance service effectiveness
After obtained the consent baseline data collection will be done. The participants will be randomized to receive either the ambassador-led strength-based intervention of usual care group. The post-test data collection will take place upon the completion of the program (9th week) and at 3-month thereafter.
The Strength-based intervention incorporates 8-week Ambassador-led strength-based intervention including:
1. a strength-based assessment to the patient-participant and caregiver done by the Social Worker,
2. Ambassador-assisted preparation of the strength-based biography,
3. four Ambassador-led workshops, the workshop will be delivered in group of 6-8 participants by at least 2 Ambassadors, and
4. one Social Worker-led zoom video conference delivered to the caregivers.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
1. a strength-based assessment to the patient-participant and caregiver done by the Social Worker,
2. Ambassador-assisted preparation of the strength-based biography,
3. four Ambassador-led workshops, the workshop will be delivered in group of 6-8 participants by at least 2 Ambassadors, and
4. one Social Worker-led zoom video conference delivered to the caregivers.
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Strength-based intervention
The Strength-based intervention incorporates 8-week Ambassador-led strength-based intervention including:
a strength-based assessment to the patient-participant and caregiver done by the Social Worker, Ambassador-assisted preparation of the strength-based biography, four Ambassador-led workshops, the workshop will be delivered in group of 6-8 participants by at least 2 Ambassadors, and one Social Worker-led zoom video conference delivered to the caregivers.
Strength-based intervention
The Strength-based intervention incorporates 8-week Ambassador-led strength-based intervention including:
1. a strength-based assessment to the patient-participant and caregiver done by the Social Worker,
2. Ambassador-assisted preparation of the strength-based biography,
3. four Ambassador-led workshops, the workshop will be delivered in group of 6-8 participants by at least 2 Ambassadors, and
4. one Social Worker-led zoom video conference delivered to the caregivers.
Usual care
No intervention, continue with usual care
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Strength-based intervention
The Strength-based intervention incorporates 8-week Ambassador-led strength-based intervention including:
1. a strength-based assessment to the patient-participant and caregiver done by the Social Worker,
2. Ambassador-assisted preparation of the strength-based biography,
3. four Ambassador-led workshops, the workshop will be delivered in group of 6-8 participants by at least 2 Ambassadors, and
4. one Social Worker-led zoom video conference delivered to the caregivers.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* a confirmed diagnosis of mild dementia as indicated by the cut-off score of Montreal Cognitive Assessment-5-min at 13-18 for dementia and \>18-21 for mild cognitive impairment
* self-reported cognitive complaints
* have the ability to engage in the communication with the research assistant
* able to identify a family caregiver
* consent to participate
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, , Hong Kong
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Haskan Avcı, Ö. (2014). Development of the Dyadic Relationship Scale. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 56, 89-108 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.56.6
Yu DS, Li PW, Zhang F, Cheng ST, Ng TK, Judge KS. The effects of a dyadic strength-based empowerment program on the health outcomes of people with mild cognitive impairment and their family caregivers: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Oct 4;14:1705-1717. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S213006. eCollection 2019.
Yeung PY, Wong LLL, Chan CC, Yung CY, Leung LMJ, Tam YY, Tang LN, Li HS, Lau ML. Montreal Cognitive Assessment - Single Cutoff Achieves Screening Purpose. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 Nov 6;16:2681-2687. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S269243. eCollection 2020.
Smith SC, Lamping DL, Banerjee S, Harwood R, Foley B, Smith P, Cook JC, Murray J, Prince M, Levin E, Mann A, Knapp M. Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology. Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(10):1-93, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9100.
Ismail Z, Aguera-Ortiz L, Brodaty H, Cieslak A, Cummings J, Fischer CE, Gauthier S, Geda YE, Herrmann N, Kanji J, Lanctot KL, Miller DS, Mortby ME, Onyike CU, Rosenberg PB, Smith EE, Smith GS, Sultzer DL, Lyketsos C; NPS Professional Interest Area of the International Society of to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment (NPS-PIA of ISTAART). The Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C): A Rating Scale for Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Pre-Dementia Populations. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;56(3):929-938. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160979.
Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2308-14. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.12.2308.
Chu LW, Chiu KC, Hui SL, Yu GK, Tsui WJ, Lee PW. The reliability and validity of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) among the elderly Chinese in Hong Kong. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2000 Jul;29(4):474-85.
Boey KW. Cross-validation of a short form of the CES-D in Chinese elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999 Aug;14(8):608-17. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199908)14:83.0.co;2-z.
Steffen AM, Gallagher-Thompson D, Arenella KM, Au A, Cheng ST, Crespo M, Cristancho-Lacroix V, Lopez J, Losada-Baltar A, Marquez-Gonzalez M, Nogales-Gonzalez C, Romero-Moreno R. Validating the Revised Scale for Caregiving Self-Efficacy: A Cross-National Review. Gerontologist. 2019 Jul 16;59(4):e325-e342. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny004.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STRENGTH-B
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.