Testing the Feasibility of a Simplified Workflow for Lung Cancer

NCT ID: NCT04844736

Last Updated: 2022-07-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-28

Study Completion Date

2022-05-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research study is to see if adding an "extra" check by formal radiology review is possible without disrupting the normal processes that take place to develop and prepare a safe radiation treatment plan for patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary Objectives: The primary objective will be to demonstrate the feasibility of radiology completing real time review of radiation oncology treatment plans within 4 business days of the date of CT simulation (defined as day = 0). If 50% of plans can be reviewed by any member of the thoracic radiology team (Includes radiology PI and co-investigators) and feedback is submitted to radiation oncology with Appendix D within 4 business days of the date of simulation, then we will consider this workflow feasible.

Secondary Objectives:

* Our primary secondary objective will be to estimate the proportion of patients whose RT plans are changed as a result this workflow.
* For patients whose radiation therapy plans are changed as a result this workflow, determine the absolute and percentage volume changes in the gross tumor volume, clinical target volume and planning target volume as a result of these changes implemented.
* For patients whose radiation therapy plans are changed as a result of this workflow: determine if recommended changes in the gross tumor volume resulted in improved dosimetry to surrounding normal structures. Specifically, determine the absolute and percentage changes in the dose delivered to the lungs (V5, V10, V20) and esophagus (mean, V60) as a result of changes in the gross tumor volume.
* For patients whose radiation therapy plans are changed as a result of this workflow, determine if changes led to treatment delays from their standard planned start date.
* For patients whose radiation therapy plans are changed as a result of this workflow, to describe the most common types of changes recommended (i.e. modification of parenchymal lung volumes, missing involved lymph nodes, covering too much normal tissue in the gross tumor volume).
* Determine whether acute esophagitis incidence changed in our entire sample as a result of this review during treatment and within 4 weeks following treatment, compared to institutional historical control databases of patients treated without formal radiology review.
* Determine whether tumor response at 4 weeks post treatment differs in our entire sample compared to institutional historical control databases of patients treated without formal radiology review.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Radiology Treatment Planning/Review

After patient consultation and enrollment, the patient will undergo routine CT simulation to initiate the radiation treatment planning process. The treating physician will contour the gross tumor volume (GTV) including the involved primary lung tumor and/or the involved lymph nodes. If the initial radiology review reflects concern for inadequate target volume delineation, the case will be flagged for multidisciplinary discussion between the radiation oncologist and radiologist.

Group Type OTHER

CT Simulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patient will undergo routine CT simulation to initiate radiation treatment planning process. For the purposes of this study, the day of CT simulation "mapping scan" will be counted as day 0. After the patient completes the CT simulation scan, the CT images and plan/structure files will be sent to the treatment planning system. The treating physician will contour the gross tumor volume (GTV) including the involved primary lung tumor and/or the involved lymph nodes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CT Simulation

Patient will undergo routine CT simulation to initiate radiation treatment planning process. For the purposes of this study, the day of CT simulation "mapping scan" will be counted as day 0. After the patient completes the CT simulation scan, the CT images and plan/structure files will be sent to the treatment planning system. The treating physician will contour the gross tumor volume (GTV) including the involved primary lung tumor and/or the involved lymph nodes.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Disease that is being treated as locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or limited stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Specifically, AJCC 8th edition staging with T3 or T4 and/or N1-3 disease. Patients with unclear pathology who are being treated clinically as non-small cell lung cancer or as limited stage small cell lung cancer are eligible.
* Plan for radiotherapy to be delivered with curative intent per the treating radiation oncologist in the Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center Department of Radiation Oncology.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Farris, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

High Point Medical Center

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest Baptist Health - Lexington

Lexington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Iredell Memorial Hospital

Statesville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest Baptist Health Sciences

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Farris MK, Razavian NB, Hughes RT, Ververs JD, Snavely AC, Leyrer CM, Tye KE, Allen LF, Pacholke HD, Weaver KE, Bunch PM, Chan MD, Clark H, Puthoff G, Farris JC, Steber CR, Wentworth S, Levine BJ, Nightingale CL, Ponnatapura J. Bridging the Communication Gaps: A Prospective Single-Arm Pilot Study Testing the Feasibility of Interdisciplinary Radiotherapy Planning in Locally Advanced Lung Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2023 Nov;30(11):2566-2573. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.01.019. Epub 2023 Feb 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36759296 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

WFBCCC 01221

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IRB00072886

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.