Standard Medical Care or Urgent Chest X-ray in Diagnosing Lung Cancer in Smokers With Chest Symptoms Who Are Older Than 60 Years

NCT ID: NCT01344005

Last Updated: 2013-08-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

386 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Diagnostic procedures, such as an urgent chest x-ray, may help in planning cancer treatment. It is not yet known whether standard medical care is more effective than an urgent x-ray in diagnosing lung cancer in smokers with chest symptoms who are older than 60 years.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying standard medical care to see how well it works compared with an urgent chest x-ray in diagnosing lung cancer in smokers with chest symptoms who are older than 60 years.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* To determine the prevalence of extra-NICE symptoms in patients consulting in UK general practice.
* To determine the proportion of patients who agree to participate in the trial.
* To determine the proportion of patients who are diagnosed with lung cancer and the best sources of routine data for capturing lung cancers.

Secondary

* To determine the best way to train general practitioners to identify and recruit eligible patients into the trial.
* To determine the most effective method of presenting the trial (and randomization) to patients.
* To determine the barriers to recruitment and how to overcome those barriers.
* To determine the best tools to use to measure anxiety/depression that may be caused by unnecessary chest-x-rays or no chest x-rays.
* To determine the best measures of resource use to facilitate health economic analysis of the cost-effectiveness of 'extra-NICE'.
* To determine the stage at diagnosis, performance status, and the proportion of patients receiving radical treatments in those diagnosed with lung cancer.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

* Arm A: Patients are managed as per the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines.
* Arm B: Patients are referred for an urgent chest x-ray according to extra-NICE guidelines.

General practitioners from South East Wales are surveyed to assess their level of interest in the proposed full trial. For the feasibility study, 20 South East Wales general practices and 6 South Yorkshire general practices are selected. General practitioners are trained to recruit all patients who fulfill the extra-NICE criteria as well as those who do not.

Patients complete questionnaires (HADS, EQ-5D, and ICECAP\[O\]) at baseline and at 2 months to measure quality of life and health economic analysis of the cost-effectiveness of extra-NICE guidelines.

Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Cancer Tobacco Use Disorder

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

non-small cell lung cancer small cell lung cancer tobacco use disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

caregiver-related intervention or procedure

Intervention Type OTHER

questionnaire administration

Intervention Type OTHER

quality-of-life assessment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

radiography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Patients over 60 seeing a participating General Practitioner
* Currently smokes 10 or more pack years, meeting at least one of the following criteria:

* New or altered cough of any duration reported to primary care
* Increased breathlessness or wheezing (with or without purulent sputum)
* Do not qualify for an urgent referral for a chest x-ray under the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines (i.e., hemoptysis or unexplained or persistent \[lasting \> 3 weeks\] signs or symptoms), including having any of the following:

* Cough
* Chest/shoulder pain
* Dyspnea
* Weight loss
* Chest signs
* Hoarseness
* Finger clubbing
* Features suggestive of metastasis from a lung cancer (e.g., in the brain, bone, liver, or skin)
* Cervical/supraclavicular lymphadenopathy

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

* Not specified

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

* No chest x-ray within in past 3 months
* No need for a chest x-ray within the next 3 weeks for reasons other than those listed under Disease Characteristics
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wales Cancer Trials Unit

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard Neal, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

North Wales Clinical School

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Prout H, Tod A, Neal R, Nelson A. Maximising recruitment of research participants into a general practice based randomised controlled trial concerning lung diagnosis-staff insights from an embedded qualitative study. Trials. 2022 Mar 21;23(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06125-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35313926 (View on PubMed)

Prout HC, Barham A, Bongard E, Tudor-Edwards R, Griffiths G, Hamilton W, Harrop E, Hood K, Hurt CN, Nelson R, Porter C, Roberts K, Rogers T, Thomas-Jones E, Tod A, Yeo ST, Neal RD, Nelson A. Patient understanding and acceptability of an early lung cancer diagnosis trial: a qualitative study. Trials. 2018 Aug 4;19(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2803-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30075741 (View on PubMed)

Neal RD, Barham A, Bongard E, Edwards RT, Fitzgibbon J, Griffiths G, Hamilton W, Hood K, Nelson A, Parker D, Porter C, Prout H, Roberts K, Rogers T, Thomas-Jones E, Tod A, Yeo ST, Hurt CN. Immediate chest X-ray for patients at risk of lung cancer presenting in primary care: randomised controlled feasibility trial. Br J Cancer. 2017 Jan;116(3):293-302. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.414. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28072761 (View on PubMed)

Hurt CN, Roberts K, Rogers TK, Griffiths GO, Hood K, Prout H, Nelson A, Fitzgibbon J, Barham A, Thomas-Jones E, Edwards RT, Yeo ST, Hamilton W, Tod A, Neal RD. A feasibility study examining the effect on lung cancer diagnosis of offering a chest X-ray to higher-risk patients with chest symptoms: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Nov 26;14:405. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-405.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24279296 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

WCTU-EL-CID

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EU-21112

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CRUK-C8350/A12199

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000699222

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id