Trial Outcomes & Findings for Bubble PEP Training Among Patient With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Pulmonary Function Effects (NCT NCT04828837)
NCT ID: NCT04828837
Last Updated: 2024-12-11
Results Overview
In the CAT, a total of eight items were used to assess the degree of dyspnea of the patients. Each item had a score ranging from 0 to 5 points, with the lowest total score being 0 points and the highest total score being 40 points. The higher the score, the higher the degree of dyspnea.
TERMINATED
NA
57 participants
The pre-tests within 48 hours of hospitalization, which served as the baseline of the intervention (T0). Assessed at 1(T1) and 4(T2) weeks, week 4 was reported.
2024-12-11
Participant Flow
The study data were collected from February 2021 to July 2021 at two teaching hospitals in northern Taiwan.
In the study, 30 patients were excluded from the study before assignment to groups4 patients declined to participate, 10 inpatients had used non-invasive PEP treatment before hospitalization, 4 patients has a mental illness, and 12 patients have notifiable respiratory infectious diseases.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Bubble Positive Expiratory Pressure Training
The experimental group receives the Bubble PEP training.
bubble PEP: Using the bubble positive expiratory pressure (Bubble PEP) for breathing training of inpatients with COPD. The training course for one day of three times. Every time needs about 20 mins. Huff and cough after the breathing training the end.
|
General Care
The control group receives the division of chest ward routine care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
13
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
8
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
10
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Bubble Positive Expiratory Pressure Training
The experimental group receives the Bubble PEP training.
bubble PEP: Using the bubble positive expiratory pressure (Bubble PEP) for breathing training of inpatients with COPD. The training course for one day of three times. Every time needs about 20 mins. Huff and cough after the breathing training the end.
|
General Care
The control group receives the division of chest ward routine care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Stay-at-home during a COVID-19 outbreak
|
1
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Admitted due to pneumothorax.
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Admitted due to HIVD for operation.
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Bubble PEP Training Among Patient With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Pulmonary Function Effects
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Bubble Positive Expiratory Pressure Training
n=13 Participants
GOLD: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; a Baseline (T0) data conduct homogenous test; Fisher's exact: Gander, Age, Marital status, Occupation, Smoking history, chronic comorbidities, diabetes mellitus, pneumothorax, lung cancer, COPD Grade
|
General Care
n=14 Participants
GOLD: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; a Baseline (T0) data conduct homogenous test; Fisher's exact: Gander, Age, Marital status, Occupation, Smoking history, chronic comorbidities, diabetes mellitus, pneumothorax, lung cancer, COPD Grade
|
Total
n=27 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
Age : < 70
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age : >= 70
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 participants
n=7 Participants
|
27 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Marital status
divorced/Single
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Marital status
married
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Occupation
blue-collar worker
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Occupation
white-collar worker
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking history
smoking
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking history
non-smoking
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking history
quit-smoking
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Chronic comorbidities
Hypertension
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Chronic comorbidities
Diabetes mellitus
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Chronic comorbidities
Heart disease
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Chronic comorbidities
Pneumothorax
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Chronic comorbidities
Lung cancer
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
COPD Grade
GOLD 2(FEV1 50-79)
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
COPD Grade
GOLD 3(FEV1 30-49)
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Dry powder bronchodilator use (day)
|
7.25 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.31 • n=5 Participants
|
3.30 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.41 • n=7 Participants
|
5.45 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.0 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: The pre-tests within 48 hours of hospitalization, which served as the baseline of the intervention (T0). Assessed at 1(T1) and 4(T2) weeks, week 4 was reported.Population: A total of 57 were randomly assigned and complete test, with 13 in the experimental group and 14 in the control group. At T1, the experimental group had 11 analyzed, experiencing a total loss of 2 participants. In comparison, the control group had 6 analyzed at T1, with a cumulative loss of 8 participants. Moving to T2, the experimental group had 8 analyzed, with a total loss of 3 participants. The control group had 4 analyzed at T2, with a cumulative loss of 2 participants.
In the CAT, a total of eight items were used to assess the degree of dyspnea of the patients. Each item had a score ranging from 0 to 5 points, with the lowest total score being 0 points and the highest total score being 40 points. The higher the score, the higher the degree of dyspnea.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
General Care Group
n=14 Participants
A total of 14 participants were enrolled in the control group and completed the baseline CAT (T0). After 7 days, in the second round, 6 participants completed the CAT T1 assessment. Five participants refused to participate in the breathing training, one participant was hospitalized for treatment due to a herniated disc, and one participant was unable to complete the T1 assessment as they stayed at home during the COVID-19 outbreak. After a 30-day study period, in the third round (T2), 6 participants completed the assessment. Two participants did not complete the third assessment. Among the participants who did not complete the third assessment, one individual refused further breathing training, and one individual stayed at home during the COVID-19 outbreak.
|
Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
A total of 13 participants were enrolled in the intervention group and completed the baseline CAT (T0). After 7 days, in the second round, 11 participants completed the CAT T1 assessment. Two participants were unable to complete the T2 assessment due to their inability to learn breathing techniques. After a 30-day study period, in the third round (T2), 8 participants completed the assessment. Among the participants who did not complete the third assessment, one individual refused to participate in the breathing training, one was hospitalized due to spontaneous pneumothorax, and one stayed at home during the COVID-19 outbreak.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Chinese Version of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test(CAT)
T1
|
11.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.04
|
13.18 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.59
|
|
The Chinese Version of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test(CAT)
T2
|
9.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.26
|
9.63 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.78
|
|
The Chinese Version of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test(CAT)
T0
|
13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.33
|
19.77 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.26
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: The pre-tests within 48 hours of hospitalization, which served as the baseline of the intervention (T0). Assessed at 1(T1) and 4(T2) weeks, week 4 was reported.Population: A total of 57 were randomly assigned and complete test, with 13 in the experimental group and 14 in the control group. At T1, the experimental group had 11 analyzed, experiencing a total loss of 2 participants. In comparison, the control group had 6 analyzed at T1, with a cumulative loss of 8 participants. Moving to T2, the experimental group had 8 analyzed, with a total loss of 3 participants. The control group had 4 analyzed at T2, with a cumulative loss of 2 participants.
CSSAQ is used to assess patients' cough and sputum symptoms. The questionnaire content is based on published literature. It consists of 25 questions, including issues related to cough, sputum, and psychological symptoms and impacts. The scoring uses a four-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The total scale score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. The content validity index is 1, and the Cronbach's α is 0.97.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
General Care Group
n=13 Participants
A total of 14 participants were enrolled in the control group and completed the baseline CAT (T0). After 7 days, in the second round, 6 participants completed the CAT T1 assessment. Five participants refused to participate in the breathing training, one participant was hospitalized for treatment due to a herniated disc, and one participant was unable to complete the T1 assessment as they stayed at home during the COVID-19 outbreak. After a 30-day study period, in the third round (T2), 6 participants completed the assessment. Two participants did not complete the third assessment. Among the participants who did not complete the third assessment, one individual refused further breathing training, and one individual stayed at home during the COVID-19 outbreak.
|
Intervention Group
n=14 Participants
A total of 13 participants were enrolled in the intervention group and completed the baseline CAT (T0). After 7 days, in the second round, 11 participants completed the CAT T1 assessment. Two participants were unable to complete the T2 assessment due to their inability to learn breathing techniques. After a 30-day study period, in the third round (T2), 8 participants completed the assessment. Among the participants who did not complete the third assessment, one individual refused to participate in the breathing training, one was hospitalized due to spontaneous pneumothorax, and one stayed at home during the COVID-19 outbreak.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Cough With Sputum Symptoms Assessment Questionnaire(CSSAQ)
T0
|
14.38 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.46
|
27.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.31
|
|
The Cough With Sputum Symptoms Assessment Questionnaire(CSSAQ)
T1
|
23.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.92
|
29.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.34
|
|
The Cough With Sputum Symptoms Assessment Questionnaire(CSSAQ)
T2
|
14.38 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.46
|
27.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.31
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: The study lasted 30 days with a total of three measurements. The first measurement baseline was 48 hours after hospitalization, the second on day 7 of the study, and the third on day 30 of the study.Population: A total of 57 were randomly assigned and complete test, with 13 in the experimental group and 14 in the control group. At T1, the experimental group had 11 analyzed, experiencing a total loss of 2 participants. In comparison, the control group had 6 analyzed at T1, with a cumulative loss of 8 participants. Moving to T2, the experimental group had 8 analyzed, with a total loss of 3 participants. The control group had 4 analyzed at T2, with a cumulative loss of 2 participants.
The TruZone peak flow meter is used to monitor the patient's Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV1). For each data collection session, three maximum expiratory flow tests are conducted, and the best value is taken as the result for that session. The measurement unit is ml/sec.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
General Care Group
n=13 Participants
A total of 14 participants were enrolled in the control group and completed the baseline CAT (T0). After 7 days, in the second round, 6 participants completed the CAT T1 assessment. Five participants refused to participate in the breathing training, one participant was hospitalized for treatment due to a herniated disc, and one participant was unable to complete the T1 assessment as they stayed at home during the COVID-19 outbreak. After a 30-day study period, in the third round (T2), 6 participants completed the assessment. Two participants did not complete the third assessment. Among the participants who did not complete the third assessment, one individual refused further breathing training, and one individual stayed at home during the COVID-19 outbreak.
|
Intervention Group
n=14 Participants
A total of 13 participants were enrolled in the intervention group and completed the baseline CAT (T0). After 7 days, in the second round, 11 participants completed the CAT T1 assessment. Two participants were unable to complete the T2 assessment due to their inability to learn breathing techniques. After a 30-day study period, in the third round (T2), 8 participants completed the assessment. Among the participants who did not complete the third assessment, one individual refused to participate in the breathing training, one was hospitalized due to spontaneous pneumothorax, and one stayed at home during the COVID-19 outbreak.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Peak Expiratory Flow Rate(PEFR)
T0
|
320.00 ml/sec
Standard Deviation 94.57
|
232.50 ml/sec
Standard Deviation 85.00
|
|
Peak Expiratory Flow Rate(PEFR)
T1
|
250.45 ml/sec
Standard Deviation 82.60
|
273.33 ml/sec
Standard Deviation 89.14
|
|
Peak Expiratory Flow Rate(PEFR)
T2
|
320.00 ml/sec
Standard Deviation 94.57
|
232.50 ml/sec
Standard Deviation 85.00
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 14 days after discharge.The number of patients who were readmitted due to COPD acute exacerbation (COPDAE) within 14 days after discharge during the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
General Care Group
n=8 Participants
A total of 14 participants were enrolled in the control group and completed the baseline CAT (T0). After 7 days, in the second round, 6 participants completed the CAT T1 assessment. Five participants refused to participate in the breathing training, one participant was hospitalized for treatment due to a herniated disc, and one participant was unable to complete the T1 assessment as they stayed at home during the COVID-19 outbreak. After a 30-day study period, in the third round (T2), 6 participants completed the assessment. Two participants did not complete the third assessment. Among the participants who did not complete the third assessment, one individual refused further breathing training, and one individual stayed at home during the COVID-19 outbreak.
|
Intervention Group
n=6 Participants
A total of 13 participants were enrolled in the intervention group and completed the baseline CAT (T0). After 7 days, in the second round, 11 participants completed the CAT T1 assessment. Two participants were unable to complete the T2 assessment due to their inability to learn breathing techniques. After a 30-day study period, in the third round (T2), 8 participants completed the assessment. Among the participants who did not complete the third assessment, one individual refused to participate in the breathing training, one was hospitalized due to spontaneous pneumothorax, and one stayed at home during the COVID-19 outbreak.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Re-hospitalization Event
rehospitalization event
|
0 Number
|
0 Number
|
|
Re-hospitalization Event
non rehospitalization event
|
8 Number
|
6 Number
|
Adverse Events
Bubble Positive Expiratory Pressure Training
General Care
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place