Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
2550 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-10-28
2025-04-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound Diagnosis of Placental and Umbilical Cord Anomalies in Singleton Pregnancies Resulting From In-vitro Fertilization
NCT05172674
Antenatal Diagnosis of Placental Attachment Disorders
NCT02442518
Diagnosis and Outcomes of Placental Accretism
NCT06833606
The Role of Ultrasonography in Labor in Predicting the Outcomes of Childbirth
NCT06806904
Breech Delivery Skills. Resident Learning Program
NCT06339164
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Duration of the study:
* Duration of the study: 54 months
* Duration of enrollment: 42 months
* Duration of follow-up completion of enrolled cases: 6 months
* Duration of data analysis: 6 months
Study Design:
During the II trimester scan, all women presenting a placenta located in the lower uterine segment will undergo evaluation by Transvaginal Sonography (TVS).
If a placenta previa or a low-lying placenta will be confirmed, the woman will be recruited and asked to participate in our study, by signing a written informed consent. In addition women attending the Maternity Triage with vaginal bleeding at \< 316/7 weeks of gestation, with a diagnosis of placenta previa or low-lying placenta and not requiring an emergency delivery will be asked to participate and will be recruited after signing the informed consent.
An expert Obstetrician will perform the TVS as scheduled, after inviting the woman to void.
The assessment will include:
* the measurement of the IOD (first caliper on the internal cervical os and second caliper on the inferior placental edge). In case of a marginal sinus, the distance between the internal cervical os and the marginal sinus will also be assessed;
* the cervical length (defined as shortened if ≤25 mm);
* the placental edge thickness, measured within 1 cm from the meeting point between the basal and the chorionic plate. The placental edge will be considered "thick" if \> 1cm or if the angle is \>45°.
All women with a resolution of a previa or low-lying placenta will be assessed in accordance with the protocol of each participating Maternity Unit, including a scan assessment at 38-39 weeks of gestation or within 28 days from the due date.
Calculation of sample size / power:
Considering that the incidence of previa and low-lying placenta is approximately 2% at the II trimester scan and 0.4% at birth, and assuming a C.I. of 19% in the probability of vaginal birth in women with low-lying placenta/resolved low-lying (\> 20 mm), 27 women will be needed for each participating Maternity Unit at the late III trimester scan. Anticipating a 10% drop out, 30 women will be needed to achieve a 95% statistical power to identify a clinically relevant difference in the rate of vaginal birth. This leads to the need of recruiting 150 women at the II trimester scan.
CRF and data management:
All data will be recorded through CRF provided by the promoter center and the database will be based on Microsoft Excel.
A sample of about 20-30 patients for each enrollment center is necessary to have a statistical power of 95% in detecting a clinically relevant difference in outcomes in the various study groups.
Analysis plan:
Descriptive statistics will be performed for all variables evaluated in the study population. Variables will be described by mean and standard deviation if normally distributed, otherwise by median and interquantile range; proportions will be used for categorical variables. The quantitative variables, among the study groups defined by the IOD at the last TVS, will be compared by parametric and non-parametric tests, whereas the categorical variables will be compared using Pearson's chi2 test (Fisher exact test where appropriate). The analyses for the primary outcome measure will be performed among women admitted to labor. A multivariate analysis will be conducted to assess the association between obstetric variables and vaginal birth.
A p-value\<0.05 will be considered significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Women having a persistent low-lying placenta with an IOD between 6 and 20 mm
Women having a persistent low-lying placenta with an IOD between 6 and 20 mm who will be offered a vaginal birth, considering 3 subgroups: 1) 6-10 mm; 2) 11-20mm; 3) \> 20 mm (resolution of previa or low-lying placenta)
No interventions assigned to this group
Women with normal located placenta
Women with a normally located placenta at the II trimester scan will represent the control group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Women with placenta previa or low-lying placenta confirmed by TVS at 19-23 6/7 weeks of gestation.
Women attending Maternity Triage with vaginal bleeding at \< 32 weeks of gestation, with a diagnosis of placenta previa or low-lying placenta and not requiring an emergency delivery.
* Women with a normally located placenta at the II trimester ultrasound scan, at 19-23 6/7 week of gestation (control group)
* Single pregnancy
* Signature of the informed consent to participate in the study
Note: Women of the "control group" will be recruited in a 1:3 ratio. After the inclusion of 1 case, 3 women with a normally located placenta will be recruited, according to the parity of the woman representing the case (e.g.: 1 CASE= nulliparous woman, 3 CONTROLS= 3 nulliparous women).
Exclusion Criteria
* Vaginal bleeding requiring emergency delivery
* Inability to meet the conditions set out in the study protocol
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Milano Bicocca
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII
Bergamo, , Italy
Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero
Brescia, , Italy
Ospedale Spedali Civili
Brescia, , Italy
Ospedale Vittorio Emanuele III
Carate Brianza, , Italy
Ospedale M. Bufalini di Cesena
Cesena, , Italy
Ospedale Desio
Desio, , Italy
Ospedale Alessandro Manzoni
Lecco, , Italy
Ospedale dei Bambini "Vittore Buzzi"
Milan, , Italy
Ospedale Mangiagalli
Milan, , Italy
Ospedale Niguarda
Milan, , Italy
Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan, , Italy
Ospedale Macedonio Melloni
Milan, , Italy
Ospedale San Paolo
Milan, , Italy
Policlinico di Modena
Modena, , Italy
Obstetrics and Gynecology, MBBM Foundation at San Gerardo Hospital
Monza, , Italy
Ospedale Infermi di Rimini
Rimini, , Italy
Ospedale Filippo Del Ponte
Varese, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Luisa Patane'
Role: primary
Edoardo Barbolini
Role: primary
Cristina Zanardini
Role: primary
Valentina Parolin
Role: backup
Annalisa Inversetti
Role: primary
Lucrezia Pignatti
Role: primary
Armando Pintucci
Role: primary
Celia Callegari
Role: primary
Elisa Fabbri
Role: primary
Valentina Sala
Role: backup
Enrico Ferrazzi
Role: primary
Grazia Volpe
Role: primary
Luca Valsecchi
Role: primary
Alice Guarano
Role: primary
Giulia Dal Molin
Role: backup
Federica Lagrasta
Role: primary
Cinzia Paolini
Role: backup
Giuseppe Chiossi
Role: primary
Alessandra Abbamondi
Role: primary
Lucrezia Pignatti
Role: primary
Antonella Cromi
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No. 713: Antenatal Corticosteroid Therapy for Fetal Maturation. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):e102-e109. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002237.
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 764: Medically Indicated Late-Preterm and Early-Term Deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e151-e155. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003083.
Al Wadi K, Schneider C, Burym C, Reid G, Hunt J, Menticoglou S. Evaluating the safety of labour in women with a placental edge 11 to 20 mm from the internal cervical Os. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Aug;36(8):674-677. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30508-9.
Blackwell SC. Timing of delivery for women with stable placenta previa. Semin Perinatol. 2011 Oct;35(5):249-51. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.05.004.
Bhide A, Prefumo F, Moore J, Hollis B, Thilaganathan B. Placental edge to internal os distance in the late third trimester and mode of delivery in placenta praevia. BJOG. 2003 Sep;110(9):860-4.
Alouini S, Megier P, Fauconnier A, Huchon C, Fievet A, Ramos A, Megier C, Valery A. Diagnosis and management of placenta previa and low placental implantation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Oct;33(19):3221-3226. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1570118. Epub 2019 Jan 27.
Dashe JS. Toward consistent terminology of placental location. Semin Perinatol. 2013 Oct;37(5):375-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2013.06.017.
Farine D, Fox HE, Jakobson S, Timor-Tritsch IE. Vaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Sep;159(3):566-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(88)80009-7.
Bronsteen R, Valice R, Lee W, Blackwell S, Balasubramaniam M, Comstock C. Effect of a low-lying placenta on delivery outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb;33(2):204-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.6304.
Ginsberg Y, Goldstein I, Lowenstein L, Weiner Z. Measurements of the lower uterine segment during gestation. J Clin Ultrasound. 2013 May;41(4):214-7. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22023. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
Fukuda M, Fukuda K, Shimizu T, Bujold E. Ultrasound Assessment of Lower Uterine Segment Thickness During Pregnancy, Labour, and the Postpartum Period. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 Feb;38(2):134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2015.12.009. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
Jansen C, de Mooij YM, Blomaard CM, Derks JB, van Leeuwen E, Limpens J, Schuit E, Mol BW, Pajkrt E. Vaginal delivery in women with a low-lying placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2019 Aug;126(9):1118-1126. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15622. Epub 2019 Mar 10.
Nakamura M, Hasegawa J, Matsuaka R, Mimura T, Ichizuka K, Sekizawa A, Okai T. Amount of hemorrhage during vaginal delivery correlates with length from placental edge to external os in cases with low-lying placenta whose length between placental edge and internal os was 1-2 cm. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012 Aug;38(8):1041-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01776.x. Epub 2012 May 21.
Ohira S, Kikuchi N, Kobara H, Osada R, Ashida T, Kanai M, Shiozawa T. Predicting the route of delivery in women with low-lying placenta using transvaginal ultrasonography: significance of placental migration and marginal sinus. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2012;73(3):217-22. doi: 10.1159/000333309. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
Jauniaux E, Alfirevic Z, Bhide AG, Belfort MA, Burton GJ, Collins SL, Dornan S, Jurkovic D, Kayem G, Kingdom J, Silver R, Sentilhes L; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management: Green-top Guideline No. 27a. BJOG. 2019 Jan;126(1):e1-e48. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15306. Epub 2018 Sep 27. No abstract available.
Oppenheimer L, Holmes P, Simpson N, Dabrowski A. Diagnosis of low-lying placenta: can migration in the third trimester predict outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;18(2):100-2. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00450.x.
Oppenheimer L; MATERNAL FETAL MEDICINE COMMITTEE. RETIRED: Diagnosis and management of placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 Mar;29(3):261-266. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32401-X.
Oppenheimer LW, Farine D. A new classification of placenta previa: measuring progress in obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;201(3):227-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.010. No abstract available.
Reddy UM, Abuhamad AZ, Levine D, Saade GR; Fetal Imaging Workshop Invited Participants. Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging Workshop. J Ultrasound Med. 2014 May;33(5):745-57. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.5.745.
Silver RM. Abnormal Placentation: Placenta Previa, Vasa Previa, and Placenta Accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):654-668. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001005.
Ornaghi S, Colciago E, Vaglio Tessitore I, Abbamondi A, Antolini L, Locatelli A, Inversetti A, Pintucci A, Cetin I, Bracco B, Fabbri E, Sala V, Meroni M, Volpe G, Benedetti S, Bulfoni C, Marconi A, Lagrasta F, Paolini CL, Mazza E, Candiani M, Valsecchi L, Smid M, Pasi F, Pozzoni M, Castoldi M, Vignali M, Dal Molin G, Guarano A, Pellegrino A, Callegari C, Betti M, Lazzarin S, Prefumo F, Zanardini C, Parolin V, Catalano A, Barbolini E, Antonazzo P, Pignatti L, Tintoni M, Spelzini F, Martinelli A, Facchinetti F, Chiossi G, Vergani P. Mode of birth in women with low-lying placenta: protocol for a prospective multicentre 1:3 matched case-control study in Italy (the MODEL-PLACENTA study). BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 6;11(12):e052510. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052510.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MODEL-PLACENTA STUDY
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.