An Evaluation of the Clinical Utility and Safety of the Visant Medical Canalicular Plug
NCT ID: NCT04817085
Last Updated: 2022-06-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
156 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-10-06
2022-02-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Eight-Week Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of VSJ-110 Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Dry Eye
NCT07179055
An Open-Label, Multi-Center, Clinical Study Evaluating the Effect of the NDE L68 StableFit® Punctal Plug on the Tear Lake
NCT04280653
Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of AVX-012 in Subjects With Mild-to-moderate Dry Eye Syndrome
NCT03162094
Quality of Life and Visual Acuity of Visglyc Eye Drops on Dry Eye Patients
NCT04063644
A Study to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of CBL-102 Versus Vismed® Multi Eye Drops in the Management of Dry Eye
NCT03368404
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study subjects who are eligible for enrollment and have provided written informed consent will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio (i.e., 2 subjects randomized to the Visant Medical Canalicular Plug for every 1 subject randomized to a commercially available canalicular plug). All study subjects will be treated bilaterally with plugs placed in the inferior canaliculi.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Visant Medical Canalicular Plug
Bilateral placement of the Visant Canalicular Plug inserted on Day 1
Visant Medical Canalicular Plug
Plug is inserted into the inferior canaliculi and assessed for 6 months
Commercially available canalicular plug
Bilateral placement of commercially available canalicular plug inserted on Day 1
Commercially available canalicular plug
Plug is inserted into the inferior canaliculi and assessed for 6 months
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Visant Medical Canalicular Plug
Plug is inserted into the inferior canaliculi and assessed for 6 months
Commercially available canalicular plug
Plug is inserted into the inferior canaliculi and assessed for 6 months
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. BCDVA of 20/40 or better in each eye
3. Both eyes with a baseline Schirmer's test with anesthetic ≤ 10 mm/5 minutes
4. Presence of corneal staining in both eyes in any of the 5 areas defined by the NEI/Industry Workshop Scale
5. Baseline OSDI score of at least 23 with no more than 3 responses of "not applicable"
6. Patent bilateral lacrimal drainage system as demonstrated by punctal irrigation
7. If female, subject must be post-menopausal, medically sterile (e.g hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy) or have negative urine pregnancy test (UPT) on Day 0 of the study and agree to utilize a medically acceptable form of contraception over the course of the study
8. Willing and able to sign informed consent and HIPAA authorization, follow study instructions, and complete all study visits.
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of surgical punctal occlusion (e.g., cautery), canalicular infection or canalicular surgery in either eye
3. Corneal transplant in either eye
4. Ocular surgery (such as cataract surgery or LASIK) in either eye within six months of the Baseline Visit
5. A systemic condition or disease not stabilized or judged by the investigator to be incompatible with participation in the study (e.g. current systemic infection, uncontrolled autoimmune disease, uncontrolled immunodeficiency disease)
6. The history or presence of any ocular disorder or condition in either eye that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the interpretation of the study results (e.g., significant corneal or conjunctival scarring, pterygium or nodular pinguecula; current ocular infection (except mild blepharitis), conjunctivitis or inflammation not associated with dry eye; anterior (epithelial) basement membrane corneal dystrophy or other clinically significant corneal dystrophy or degeneration; history of ocular herpetic infection; evidence of keratoconus; lid or lacrimal cancer
7. Active severe systemic allergy, seasonal allergies, rhinitis or sinusitis requiring treatment (i.e., antihistamines, decongestants, oral or aerosol steroids)
8. Use of steroids, including administration by systemic or topical ocular routes (dermatologic steroids not applied to the eyelids and inhaled steroids are allowed)
9. Participation in a clinical trial during the past 30 days
10. Women who are pregnant, planning a pregnancy, or nursing at study entry
22 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Visant Medical, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Roger Albright
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ora Clinical Research Organization
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Schwartz Laser Eye Center
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Eye Research Foundation, Inc.
Newport Beach, California, United States
Andover Eye Associates
Andover, Massachusetts, United States
Piedmont Eye, Inc.
Lynchburg, Virginia, United States
See Clearly Vision
McLean, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
D-348-CSP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.