Conventional Endoscopic Techniques Versus EndoRotor® System for Necrosectomy of Walled of Necrosis
NCT ID: NCT04814693
Last Updated: 2025-08-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-02
2027-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Therefore, aim of this study is to assess the performance of the EndoRotor, as compared to conventional endoscopic techniques, for direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) of walled off necrosis (WON) in a randomized controlled trial.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
EndoRotor DEN (Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy)Trial
NCT03694210
Randomized Trial of Immediate Endoscopic Necrosectomy vs. Step-up Endoscopic Interventions in Necrotizing Pancreatitis
NCT05043415
Comparison of FCSEMS and Plastic Stents
NCT02685865
Effectiveness of Endorotor PED® System Versus Conventional Endoscopic Techniques for the Management of Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Randomized Single-blinded Controlled Superiority Trial and Cost-utility Analysis
NCT07253350
Endoscopic Large Caliber Drainage vs. Complete Necrosectomy for Treatment of Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis
NCT02564965
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Interventional arm
Subjects randomized to the control device arm will undergo treatment with the EndoRotor System, which is a powered debridement tool intended for use in endoscopic procedures to resect and remove necrotic debris during direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) for walled-off necrosis. The system consists of capital components including a power console, roll stand, vacuum pump, and foot control; as well as disposable components including a single-use catheter, purge kit, and suction bag. The EndoRotor System has CE-Mark 613797 and is cleared for use by the FDA in the United States.
EndoRotor® System (Interscope, Inc., Northbridge, MA USA),
The EndoRotor System is intended for use in endoscopic procedures to resect and remove necrotic debris during DEN for WON. DEN with the EndoRotor System (study device) is considered to be standard of care therapy for patients with WON and not investigational.
Control arm
Subjects randomized to the control device arm will undergo conventional DEN as per the standard of care. Investigators will choose conventional DEN instruments according to their preference.
Conventional endoscopic devices (according to standards of care)
Endoscopic devices used to perform conventional DEN will be chosen according to standard of care and Investigator preference.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EndoRotor® System (Interscope, Inc., Northbridge, MA USA),
The EndoRotor System is intended for use in endoscopic procedures to resect and remove necrotic debris during DEN for WON. DEN with the EndoRotor System (study device) is considered to be standard of care therapy for patients with WON and not investigational.
Conventional endoscopic devices (according to standards of care)
Endoscopic devices used to perform conventional DEN will be chosen according to standard of care and Investigator preference.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
a. Stent must be in place for a minimum of 2 days prior to the DEN procedure.
* Patients who can tolerate repeat endoscopic procedures.
* Subjects with the ability to understand the requirements of the study, who have provided written informed consent, and who are willing and able to return for the required follow-up assessments.
* ASA classification \< 5.
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
* Intervening gastric varices or unavoidable blood vessels within the WON access tract (visible using endoscopy or endoscopic ultrasound).
* Coagulation disorders or anti-coagulant therapy which cannot be discontinued (aspirin allowed).
* Any condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would create an unsafe clinical situation or stent placement that would not allow the patient to safely undergo an endoscopic procedure.
* Pregnant or lactating women or women of childbearing potential who do not employ a reliable method of contraception as judged by the Investigator, and/or are not willing to use reliable contraception for the duration of study participation.
* Patient is enrolled in another trial that could interfere with the endpoint analyses of this trial.
* Prior necrosectomy on existing collection.
* Greater than 2 pancreatic / extra-pancreatic fluid collections.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Interscope, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Erasmus Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marco J. Bruno
Prof. Marco Bruno
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marco Bruno, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Erasmus Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama Medical Center
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
California Pacific Medical Center
San Francisco, California, United States
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Copenhagen University Hospital
Hvidovre, , Denmark
Evangelical Hospital
Düsseldorf, , Germany
University of Frankfurt
Frankfurt, , Germany
Humanitas Reserach Hospital & Humanitas University
Milan, , Italy
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Roma, , Italy
Charlotte van Veldhuisen
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Amsterdam University Medical Center
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
St. Antonius Hospital
Nieuwegein, , Netherlands
Central Manchester University Hospital
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLIN-0061
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.