A Study of Sabatolimab in Combination With Azacitidine and Venetoclax in High or Very High Risk MDS Participants
NCT ID: NCT04812548
Last Updated: 2025-10-09
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-05-31
2023-05-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study of MBG453 in Combination With Hypomethylating Agents in Subjects With IPSS-R Intermediate, High or Very High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS).
NCT03946670
A Study of Sabatolimab and Magrolimab-based Treatment in AML or Higher Risk MDS Participants
NCT05367401
Study of Sapacitabine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)
NCT01211457
Eltrombopag Treatment of Thrombocytopenia in Subjects With Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia After MDS (sAML/MDS)
NCT00903422
Safety and Efficacy Study of CC-486 in Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndromes
NCT02281084
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary purpose of Part 1 (Safety run-in) was to rule out excessive toxicity of sabatolimab, when administered in combination with azacitidine and venetoclax. The primary purpose of the combined cohort 2 of the Safety run-in (Part 1) and Expansion (Part 2) was to have evaluated efficacy of sabatolimab, when administered in combination with azacitidine and venetoclax in adult participants with high or very high risk MDS. But due to the decision by Novartis to halt recruitment at the end of the Safety run-in, the study enrolled participants in Part 1 only.
This study was to have consisted of two parts:
Safety Run-in Part:
The first approximately 18 participants to have joined the study would have been part of the safety run-in. The first approximately 6 participants would have been enrolled to the lower dose given every four weeks sabatolimab safety run-in cohort.
After these participants would have completed 2 cycles of treatment a decision would have been made to confirm whether the chosen combination of sabatolimab with azacitidine and venetoclax was considered safe to continue with approximately 12 participants, to have been enrolled to the higher dose given every four weeks safety run-in cohort. After these participants would have completed 2 cycles of treatment a decision would have been made to confirm whether the chosen combination of sabatolimab with azacitidine and venetoclax was considered safe to continue with expansion part of the study.
Expansion Part (which did not occur):
After the safety run-in part would have confirmed that the study treatment (higher dose of sabatolimab given every four weeks with azacitidine and venetoclax) was safe, about 58 more participants would have been enrolled in the expansion part to better investigate the efficacy of the study treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
sabatolimab + azacitidine + venetoclax
Part 1: Safety run-in consisted of 2 subsequent cohorts of a lower dose (cohort 1) and a higher dose (cohort 2) of sabatolimab in combination with fixed dose of venetoclax and azacitidine.
Part 2 (did not start as recruitment was stopped in Part 1) Expansion was to enroll additional participants to further investigate the regimen including sabatolimab at the higher dose, azacitidine and venetoclax. Participants data from Part 1 and Part 2 treated with the higher dose was to have been combined to determine the complete remission rate.
sabatolimab
Sabatolimab was administered at a low dose (Safety run-in (Part 1) cohort 1) or a high dose (Safety run-in (Part 1) cohort 2) via i.v. infusion over 30 minutes on Day 8 of every treatment cycle. Cycle = 28 days
azacitidine
A standard dose of azacitidine was given subcutaneously or intravenously every day for seven consecutive days on days 1-7 of a confirmed treatment cycle. In keeping with standard clinical practice, the alternative schedules for five consecutive days on days 1-5, followed by a two day break, then two consecutive days on days 8-9 was permitted (alternative schedule).
venetoclax
Venetoclax film-coated tablets was administered at a dose of 400 mg orally or corresponding reduced dose for concomitant use with P-gp inhibitors or moderate or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors, once a day, from C1D1 to C1D14 during the treatment cycle. No ramp-up for venetoclax was necessary.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
sabatolimab
Sabatolimab was administered at a low dose (Safety run-in (Part 1) cohort 1) or a high dose (Safety run-in (Part 1) cohort 2) via i.v. infusion over 30 minutes on Day 8 of every treatment cycle. Cycle = 28 days
azacitidine
A standard dose of azacitidine was given subcutaneously or intravenously every day for seven consecutive days on days 1-7 of a confirmed treatment cycle. In keeping with standard clinical practice, the alternative schedules for five consecutive days on days 1-5, followed by a two day break, then two consecutive days on days 8-9 was permitted (alternative schedule).
venetoclax
Venetoclax film-coated tablets was administered at a dose of 400 mg orally or corresponding reduced dose for concomitant use with P-gp inhibitors or moderate or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors, once a day, from C1D1 to C1D14 during the treatment cycle. No ramp-up for venetoclax was necessary.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age ≥ 18 years at the date of signing the informed consent form (ICF)
3. Morphologically confirmed diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) based on 2016 WHO classification (Arber et al, 2016) by local investigator assessment with one of the following Prognostic Risk Categories, based on the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) (Greenberg et al 2012):
* Very high (\> 6 points)
* High (\> 4.5-6 points)
4. Not immediately eligible for hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) or intensive chemotherapy at the time of screening due to individual clinical factors such as age, comorbidities and performance status, donor availability (de Witte et al 2017)
5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
Exclusion Criteria
2. Prior therapy with immune check point inhibitors (e.g. anti-CTLA4, anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-PD-L2) or cancer vaccines is not allowed if the last dose of the drug was administered within 4 months prior to start of treatment
3. Previous first-line treatment for very high risk or high risk myelodysplastic syndromes (based on IPSS-R,Greenberg et al 2012 and Arber et al, 2016) with any antineoplastic agents, approved or investigational, including for example chemotherapy, lenalidomide and hypomethylating agents (HMAs) such as decitabine or azacitidine However, a one single cycle of HMAs treatment only started prior to enrollment is allowed.
4. Live vaccine administered within 30 days prior to start of treatment
5. Current use or use within 14 days prior to start of treatment of systemic steroid therapy (\> 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) or any immunosuppressive therapy. Topical, inhaled, nasal, ophthalmic steroids are allowed. Replacement therapy, steroids given in the context of a transfusion, are allowed and not considered a form of systemic treatment
6. History of severe hypersensitivity reactions to any ingredient of study drug(s) (azacitidine, venetoclax or sabatolimab) or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and/or their excipients
7. Participants with Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) based on 2016 WHO classification (Arber et al, 2016) with revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) ≤ 4.5
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Novartis Investigative Site
Brasschaat, , Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Marseille, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Nice, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Düsseldorf, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Stuttgart, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Alexandroupoli, Evros, Greece
Novartis Investigative Site
Pátrai, , Greece
Novartis Investigative Site
Nyíregyháza, , Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Genova, GE, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020-003669-21
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CMBG453B12203
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.