Removal of Intrauterine Retained Products of Conception (RPOC) After Miscarriage Guided by Hysteroscopy Trial. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT ID: NCT04804332
Last Updated: 2024-05-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
244 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-12
2027-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: To assess, in women with a wish for immediate future pregnancy and RPOC after non-surgical management of a miscarriage, as diagnosed with sonography, the effects of operative hysteroscopy versus expectant management.
Study design: Multicenter randomized clinical trial. Study population: Patients after non-surgical management of a miscarriage with sonographic evidence of RPOC at the follow-up visit 6 weeks after initial treatment and wish for immediate (within 6 months) future pregnancy.
Intervention: operative hysteroscopy versus expectant management. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is time to next pregnancy, as substantiated by a positive urinary or serum hCG test. Secondary outcomes are Quality of Life (QOL) scores assessed with the SF-36, HADS and EQ-5D-5L, the need for additional and/or unscheduled treatments and/or visits and complications. Furthermore, data on the course of pregnancy - including miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and live birth - are documented in those women who have an ongoing pregnancy after randomization during the study follow up period. In addition, iMTA PCQ questionnaires and health-costs are measured in all patients to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis.
A total of 244 (122 per arm) women will be sufficient to answer the questions on the primary endpoint.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Women participating in the study will be asked to fill out questionnaires at baseline, 8 weeks and 6 months after randomization. We don not expect specific risks as a result of either the intervention or expectant management.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The HYsteroscopic Miscarriage MaNagement Trial: A Pilot RCT Investigating a Novel Management Pathway for RPOC
NCT04751500
Management of RPOC After Induced Abortion
NCT04685694
Dilation and Curettage Versus Operative Hysteroscopy for Missed Abortion
NCT04705324
MISOPROSTOL FOR THE TREATMENT OF SUSPECTED POSTPARTUM RETAINED PRODUCTS OF CONCEPTION
NCT06009679
Intraumbilical Misoprostol in Retained Placenta
NCT01840813
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Multicenter
* Randomized controlled
* Parallel group design
* Superiority trial
* Non-blinded
Primary Objective
To compare the effectiveness in terms of time to next pregnancy between operative hysteroscopy and expectant management in patients with sonographic evidence of RPOC after primary non-surgical management of miscarriage.
Secondary Objectives
1. Effectiveness objectives
To compare the effectiveness between operative hysteroscopy and expectant management with respect to:
* Generic quality of life (QOL) (as measured by SF-36, HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)) and EQ-5D-5L 6 months after randomization
* Course of pregnancy in those women who have an ongoing pregnancy after randomization during the study follow-up period (including miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and live birth)
2. Safety objectives
To compare the safety between operative hysteroscopy and expectant management with respect to:
* Necessity for additional treatment
* Out-of-protocol/unscheduled visits to the outpatient clinic or general practitioner
* Complications
3. Cost-effectiveness objectives To compare the health related costs between operative hysteroscopy and expectant management.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
* Multicenter
* Randomized controlled
* Parallel group design
* Superiority trial
* Non-blinded
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT
No treatment will be offered.
Expectant management
No treatment will be offered. Patients will be given telephone numbers to contact a doctor. In case of severe complaints, defined as heavy uterine bleeding and/or severe abdominal pain, not responding to conservative treatment, an emergency curettage or operative hysteroscopy may be performed.
OPERATIVE HYSTEROSCOPY
Operative hysteroscopy using hysteroscopic morcellation (TruClearTM Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA)) is performed.
Operative hysteroscopy
Operative hysteroscopy is performed without or under local, regional or general anesthesia according to the local protocol preferably within 2 to 3 weeks after randomization. In case of highly vascularized RPOC, a repeat sonogram is performed 2 to 4 weeks after randomization to check for persistence of vascularity and to optimize operative timing. Operative hysteroscopy is then performed within 2 to 3 weeks after the repeat sonogram. Removal of the RPOC is performed by an experienced gynecologist using hysteroscopic morcellation (TruClearTM Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA)) and according to the local protocol.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Operative hysteroscopy
Operative hysteroscopy is performed without or under local, regional or general anesthesia according to the local protocol preferably within 2 to 3 weeks after randomization. In case of highly vascularized RPOC, a repeat sonogram is performed 2 to 4 weeks after randomization to check for persistence of vascularity and to optimize operative timing. Operative hysteroscopy is then performed within 2 to 3 weeks after the repeat sonogram. Removal of the RPOC is performed by an experienced gynecologist using hysteroscopic morcellation (TruClearTM Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA)) and according to the local protocol.
Expectant management
No treatment will be offered. Patients will be given telephone numbers to contact a doctor. In case of severe complaints, defined as heavy uterine bleeding and/or severe abdominal pain, not responding to conservative treatment, an emergency curettage or operative hysteroscopy may be performed.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Women aged over 39 years
* Women not wanting to achieve pregnancy within the first 6 months after non-surgical treatment for miscarriage
* Women with a history of repeated miscarriage defined as 3 or more consecutive pregnancy losses before 20 weeks of pregnancy duration
* Women with untreated and/or untreatable subfertility
* Women presenting with severe uterine bleeding, defined as uterine bleeding that needs acute intervention on medical grounds
* Women presenting with severe abdominal pain, defined as abdominal pain that needs acute intervention on medical grounds
* Women with fever (\> 38.5° Celsius) or sepsis requiring antibiotic treatment. For the definition of 'sepsis' we refer to the Third International Consensus definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Singer 2016)
* Women with a contraindication for (office) operative hysteroscopy
* Women with a failed non-surgical management for miscarriage, as substantiated by the sonographic finding of an intact gestational sac still in situ
* Women with a congenital uterine anomaly
* Known cervical stenosis making safe uterine access impossible
* Visual or pathological (e.g. on biopsy) evidence of malignancy
18 Years
39 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic
INDUSTRY
University Hospital, Ghent
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tjalina Hamerlynck, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Ghent
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ghent University Hospital
Ghent, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BC-08856
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.