Removal of Intrauterine Retained Products of Conception (RPOC) After Miscarriage Guided by Hysteroscopy Trial. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

NCT ID: NCT04804332

Last Updated: 2024-05-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

244 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-12

Study Completion Date

2027-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale: Elective immediate dilation and curettage (D\&C) for miscarriage is associated with the occurrence of intrauterine adhesions (IUA). IUAs may be associated with subsequent subfertility and premature birth. Recent studies have shown that in women with miscarriage, medical treatment (misoprostol/mifepristone) is an effective alternative for curettage. A problem with medication and expectant management is that after initial treatment, sonographic findings during follow-up frequently show incomplete evacuation of uterine retained products of conception (RPOC), which often lead to additional interventions or expectant time-consuming management limiting the benefits of medical treatment.

Objective: To assess, in women with a wish for immediate future pregnancy and RPOC after non-surgical management of a miscarriage, as diagnosed with sonography, the effects of operative hysteroscopy versus expectant management.

Study design: Multicenter randomized clinical trial. Study population: Patients after non-surgical management of a miscarriage with sonographic evidence of RPOC at the follow-up visit 6 weeks after initial treatment and wish for immediate (within 6 months) future pregnancy.

Intervention: operative hysteroscopy versus expectant management. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is time to next pregnancy, as substantiated by a positive urinary or serum hCG test. Secondary outcomes are Quality of Life (QOL) scores assessed with the SF-36, HADS and EQ-5D-5L, the need for additional and/or unscheduled treatments and/or visits and complications. Furthermore, data on the course of pregnancy - including miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and live birth - are documented in those women who have an ongoing pregnancy after randomization during the study follow up period. In addition, iMTA PCQ questionnaires and health-costs are measured in all patients to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis.

A total of 244 (122 per arm) women will be sufficient to answer the questions on the primary endpoint.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Women participating in the study will be asked to fill out questionnaires at baseline, 8 weeks and 6 months after randomization. We don not expect specific risks as a result of either the intervention or expectant management.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Design : RCT

* Multicenter
* Randomized controlled
* Parallel group design
* Superiority trial
* Non-blinded

Primary Objective

To compare the effectiveness in terms of time to next pregnancy between operative hysteroscopy and expectant management in patients with sonographic evidence of RPOC after primary non-surgical management of miscarriage.

Secondary Objectives

1. Effectiveness objectives

To compare the effectiveness between operative hysteroscopy and expectant management with respect to:
* Generic quality of life (QOL) (as measured by SF-36, HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)) and EQ-5D-5L 6 months after randomization
* Course of pregnancy in those women who have an ongoing pregnancy after randomization during the study follow-up period (including miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and live birth)
2. Safety objectives

To compare the safety between operative hysteroscopy and expectant management with respect to:
* Necessity for additional treatment
* Out-of-protocol/unscheduled visits to the outpatient clinic or general practitioner
* Complications
3. Cost-effectiveness objectives To compare the health related costs between operative hysteroscopy and expectant management.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Retained Products of Conception

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Design : RCT

* Multicenter
* Randomized controlled
* Parallel group design
* Superiority trial
* Non-blinded
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT

No treatment will be offered.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Expectant management

Intervention Type OTHER

No treatment will be offered. Patients will be given telephone numbers to contact a doctor. In case of severe complaints, defined as heavy uterine bleeding and/or severe abdominal pain, not responding to conservative treatment, an emergency curettage or operative hysteroscopy may be performed.

OPERATIVE HYSTEROSCOPY

Operative hysteroscopy using hysteroscopic morcellation (TruClearTM Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA)) is performed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Operative hysteroscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Operative hysteroscopy is performed without or under local, regional or general anesthesia according to the local protocol preferably within 2 to 3 weeks after randomization. In case of highly vascularized RPOC, a repeat sonogram is performed 2 to 4 weeks after randomization to check for persistence of vascularity and to optimize operative timing. Operative hysteroscopy is then performed within 2 to 3 weeks after the repeat sonogram. Removal of the RPOC is performed by an experienced gynecologist using hysteroscopic morcellation (TruClearTM Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA)) and according to the local protocol.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Operative hysteroscopy

Operative hysteroscopy is performed without or under local, regional or general anesthesia according to the local protocol preferably within 2 to 3 weeks after randomization. In case of highly vascularized RPOC, a repeat sonogram is performed 2 to 4 weeks after randomization to check for persistence of vascularity and to optimize operative timing. Operative hysteroscopy is then performed within 2 to 3 weeks after the repeat sonogram. Removal of the RPOC is performed by an experienced gynecologist using hysteroscopic morcellation (TruClearTM Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA)) and according to the local protocol.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Expectant management

No treatment will be offered. Patients will be given telephone numbers to contact a doctor. In case of severe complaints, defined as heavy uterine bleeding and/or severe abdominal pain, not responding to conservative treatment, an emergency curettage or operative hysteroscopy may be performed.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients after first trimester miscarriage treated non-surgically with sonographic evidence for the presence of RPOC at follow-up visit after 6 weeks (± 1 week) who have an immediate future pregnancy wish and are willing to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Women aged below 18 years
* Women aged over 39 years
* Women not wanting to achieve pregnancy within the first 6 months after non-surgical treatment for miscarriage
* Women with a history of repeated miscarriage defined as 3 or more consecutive pregnancy losses before 20 weeks of pregnancy duration
* Women with untreated and/or untreatable subfertility
* Women presenting with severe uterine bleeding, defined as uterine bleeding that needs acute intervention on medical grounds
* Women presenting with severe abdominal pain, defined as abdominal pain that needs acute intervention on medical grounds
* Women with fever (\> 38.5° Celsius) or sepsis requiring antibiotic treatment. For the definition of 'sepsis' we refer to the Third International Consensus definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Singer 2016)
* Women with a contraindication for (office) operative hysteroscopy
* Women with a failed non-surgical management for miscarriage, as substantiated by the sonographic finding of an intact gestational sac still in situ
* Women with a congenital uterine anomaly
* Known cervical stenosis making safe uterine access impossible
* Visual or pathological (e.g. on biopsy) evidence of malignancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

39 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tjalina Hamerlynck, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Ghent

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ghent University Hospital

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Eline Meireson

Role: CONTACT

+3293327817

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Eline Meireson, Msc

Role: primary

+3293327817

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BC-08856

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Misoprostol for Non-Viable Pregnancies
NCT00426491 COMPLETED PHASE3
Intracervical Vasopressin
NCT07102615 RECRUITING PHASE4
Optimal Treatment of Miscarriage
NCT01033903 COMPLETED NA
Misoprostol in Missed Abortion
NCT06818903 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Hysteroscopy and Misoprostol Project
NCT00363389 COMPLETED PHASE3