Safety and Oversight of the Individually Tailored Treatment Approach: A Novel Pilot Study

NCT ID: NCT04801966

Last Updated: 2023-05-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

3 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-23

Study Completion Date

2022-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is looking at outcomes in people with advanced cancers who have exhausted standard treatment options and are accessing off indication or unregistered drugs or combinations of drugs through compassionate access from the manufacturer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Some advanced cancers have numerous standard treatment options that have proven efficacy in clinical trials. However, in other cancers, there may be few or no standard treatment options with proven efficacy as determined in a large clinical trial. This may be particularly the case for rare cancers in which there is a lack of clinical research. When seriously ill patients run out of standard treatment options, they will often consider non-standard treatment options (such as treatments that are currently unapproved by the regulatory agency for the given indication). The majority of clinicians and researchers agree that this is best received in a clinical trial setting as this provides ethical and clinical oversight, as well as addresses prospectively defined research questions which can be publicly reported. This allows the conclusions of the research to be available to the entire clinical and research community.

In general, an access program enables patient access to a non-reimbursed therapeutic agent, outside of a clinical trial setting. Compassionate access is typically for therapeutics that are not yet approved or TGA registered, and are still considered investigational. In general, there is a negotiation between the pharmaceutical company and the clinician and patient regarding access to the therapeutic agent, as well as whether the medicine will be provided free of charge, or on some form of cost-sharing arrangement. In Australia, access to TGA non-registered medicines also requires an application via the "Special Access Scheme". For most cancer patients, the use falls under category A, for a patient defined as seriously ill. This sub-study generally pertains to compassionate access to therapeutic agents. Given the ad hoc nature of compassionate access for patients, there is relatively little reported data on clinical outcomes.

Compassionate access is an established process with increasing demands. This study is designed to provide a framework for which patients treated with compassionate access therapeutics can register, so that some of the limitations of ad hoc compassionate access programs can be overcome.

A study committee will prospectively assess each individual patient's detailed treatment approach in an objective and time-efficient manner. If approved, the patient may be eligible to register into the treatment phase of the study. The study committee is essential to provide a balanced approach to understanding the rationale for the study treatment, as well as potential safety issues that may arise. As previously reported, this is an essential component to improving patient oversight as well as equity

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment

All participants will have an individualised treatment plan. The possible treatments that can be prescribed are as follows, they may be given as a single agent or in combination

* Trametinib 2 mg/day
* Cobimetinib 60 mg/day, on day 1-21 of each 28 day cycle (21 days on, 7 days off)
* Binimetinib 45 mg/ twice a day
* Alpelisib 300 mg/day
* Vemurafenib 960 mg twice a day
* Dabrafenib 150 mg twice a day
* Encorafenib 450 mg/day
* Palbociclib 125 mg/day, on day 1-21 of each 28 day cycle (21 days on, 7 days off)
* Ribociclib 600 mg/day, on day 1-21 of each 28 day cycle (21 days on, 7 days off
* Abemaciclib 150 mg twice a day
* Olaparib 300 mg twice a day
* Talazoparib 1 mg/day
* Nivolumab 240 mg IV once every two weeks
* Atezolizumab 1200 mg IV on day 1 of a 21 day cycle
* Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on day 1 of a 21 day cycle

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Trametinib

Intervention Type DRUG

2 mg per day, continuous

Cobimetinib

Intervention Type DRUG

60 mg/day for 21 days of a 28 day cycle

Binimetinib

Intervention Type DRUG

45 mg/twice a day, continuous

Alpelisib

Intervention Type DRUG

300 mg/day, continuous

Vemurafenib

Intervention Type DRUG

960 mg/twice per day, continuous

Dabrafenib

Intervention Type DRUG

150 mg/twicce per day, continuous

Encorafenib

Intervention Type DRUG

450 mg/day, continuous

Palbociclib

Intervention Type DRUG

125 mg/day, day 1-21 of a 28 day cycle

Olaparib

Intervention Type DRUG

300 mg/twice per day, continuous

Ribociclib

Intervention Type DRUG

600 mg/day, on day 1 -21 of a 28 day cycle

Abemaciclib

Intervention Type DRUG

150 mg twice/day, continuous

Talazoparib

Intervention Type DRUG

1 mg/day, on day 1 -28 of each 28 day cycle

Nivolumab

Intervention Type DRUG

240 mg IV once every 2 weeks

Atezolizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

1200 mg IV on Day 1 of a 21 day cycle

Pembrolizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

200 mg IV on day 1 of a 21 day cycle

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Trametinib

2 mg per day, continuous

Intervention Type DRUG

Cobimetinib

60 mg/day for 21 days of a 28 day cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

Binimetinib

45 mg/twice a day, continuous

Intervention Type DRUG

Alpelisib

300 mg/day, continuous

Intervention Type DRUG

Vemurafenib

960 mg/twice per day, continuous

Intervention Type DRUG

Dabrafenib

150 mg/twicce per day, continuous

Intervention Type DRUG

Encorafenib

450 mg/day, continuous

Intervention Type DRUG

Palbociclib

125 mg/day, day 1-21 of a 28 day cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

Olaparib

300 mg/twice per day, continuous

Intervention Type DRUG

Ribociclib

600 mg/day, on day 1 -21 of a 28 day cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

Abemaciclib

150 mg twice/day, continuous

Intervention Type DRUG

Talazoparib

1 mg/day, on day 1 -28 of each 28 day cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

Nivolumab

240 mg IV once every 2 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Atezolizumab

1200 mg IV on Day 1 of a 21 day cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

Pembrolizumab

200 mg IV on day 1 of a 21 day cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient or their parent(s)/legal guardian(s) has provided written informed consent using the main study PICF

1. Male or female patient, aged 2 years or older
2. Patient has pathologically confirmed locally advanced, incurable or metastatic cancer of any histological type
3. Have an available TRIAGE sub-study with a matched therapy
4. Documented progression following standard therapy, or for whom, in the opinion of the Investigator, no appropriate standard therapy exists
5. Life expectancy of \> 3 months
6. Adequate performance status:

i. For patients aged 18 years or over, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2 (appendix 1) ii. For patients aged 17 years, Karnofsky score ≥ 50 (appendix 2) iii. For patients aged 16 years or under, Lansky score ≥ 50 (appendix 3)
3. Treatment regimen and schedule of assessments that has been approved by the TAILOR Study Committee
4. Approved treatment is obtainable
5. Patient has measurable disease or evaluable disease as defined by RECIST 1.1 (or RANO criteria for primary CNS cancers or the Cheson (IWG) revised response criteria for lymphomas)
6. Patient must have adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function within 7 days prior to registration:

* ANC ≥ 1.5 x 109/L
* Platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L (platelet count ≥ 50 x 109/L for haematological malignancy indications)
* ALT ≤ 2.5x ULN, unless liver metastases or invasion are present, in which case it must be ≤ 5x ULN
* AST ≤ 2.5x ULN, unless liver metastases or invasion are present, in which case it must be ≤ 5x ULN
* Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5x ULN except patients with Gilbert's Syndrome, who are eligible in consultation with their physician
* Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5x ULN
7. Patient is willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study including undergoing, treatment, and scheduled visits and examination including follow up
8. Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening for the main study and agree to use highly effective methods of birth control while receiving approved treatment through to the time frame specified in the approved ITAP after the last dose. Patients of childbearing potential are those who have not been surgically sterilised or have not been free from menses for \> 1 year.
9. Sexually active males must agree to use a condom during intercourse while taking the approved treatment through to the time frame specified in the approved ITAP after the last dose and should not father a child in this period.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Significant cardiovascular disease
2. Any other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding that contraindicates the use of an investigational drug, may affect the interpretation of the results, or may render the patient at high risk from treatment complications
3. Other co-morbidities or conditions that may compromise assessment of key outcomes or in the opinion of the clinician, limit the ability of the patient to comply with the protocol
2. Any unresolved toxicity (≥CTCAE grade 2) from previous anti-cancer therapy, with the exception of alopecia.

Patients with irreversible toxicity that is not reasonably expected to be exacerbated by the investigational product(s) may be included (e.g. hearing loss, peripheral neuropathy)
3. Symptomatic, or actively progressing CNS metastases (unless a primary brain tumour).Patients with a history of treated

CNS lesions are eligible, provided that all of the following criteria are met:

Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1 must be present outside the CNS Metastases are limited to the cerebellum or the supratentorial region (i.e. no metastases to the midbrain, pons, medulla, or spinal cord) There is no clinical evidence of interim progression between completion of CNS-directed therapy and registration on the study (radiological re-assessment is not required) The patient has not received radiotherapy within 14 days prior to registration Anticonvulsant therapy at a stable dose is permitted
4. History of leptomeningeal disease unless a primary brain tumour
5. Known active infection including tuberculosis, HBV, HCV, or HIV. Patients with a past or resolved HBV infection (defined as the presence of HBcAb and absence of HBsAg) are eligible. Patients with a past or resolved HCV infection are eligible only if polymerase chain reaction is negative for HCV RNA
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephen Luen, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20/029

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.