Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
3091 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-10-25
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The current study aims to benchmark different commercial typhoid tests against a defined reference standard applied in multiple population and simultaneously develop a sample set that can be used in future evaluations of emerging technologies and/or to support innovative test development.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Investigating Typhoid Fever Pathogenesis
NCT03067961
Combined Vi Vaccination and Health Education Program on the Burden of Typhoid in Childhood
NCT00125047
Understanding How Salmonella Typhi Infects Humans (Bottlenecks)
NCT03889067
Studies of Immune Responses to Orally Administered Vaccines in Developing Country
NCT01019083
Understanding Paratyphoid Infection
NCT02100397
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Typhoid endemic areas are located mainly in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa and is transmitted through contaminated water and food. The disease is treatable with a specific antibiotics regimen, however antimicrobial resistance has been reported in several countries, particularly in Pakistan.Several vaccines have been developed but their uptake has been low, partly due to limited information on the exact burden of the disease in endemic countries.
The symptoms of typhoid are similar to other undifferentiated febrile illnesses and typhoid can be mistaken with vector borne febrile illnesses such as scrub typhus.
Blood and bone marrow cultures are considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of typhoid. Those methods require specific infrastructure and skilled staff that are not always available in LMICs and are not adequate for rapid patient management. In addition, although very specific, blood culture sensitivity is impacted by misuse of antibiotics that lower the bacterial load to undetectable levels in patients' blood.
As a consequence, alternatives to blood culture have been used in LMIC. The Widal test is the most used test despite a low performance (sensitivity range: 57-34%; specificity range: 43-83%;reported in several studies. Other options in typhoid diagnosis are rapid diagnostic tests; among them, three tests (Typhidot, Tubex and Test-itâ„¢ Typhoid IgM) have been evaluated in several studies. It has been reported a variability of tests performance in different studies and according to the geographical regions. Variability in the test performance reported so far in the literature has hampered WHO to recommend any of these rapid tests in the EDL. FIND in collaboration with international typhoid experts developed a target product profile outlining the ideal characteristics of point of care tests. As part of this activity it became apparent that no quality data are available that systematically compare all available commercially point of care tests against the same set of reference standards used in multiple populations (e.g. Africa vs Asia). These lack of benchmarking data significantly impedes health providers' ability to decide on the utility of commercial tests in different settings, ultimately restricting use and access. Further the lack of well characterized samples reduces the ability for targeted innovation in the typhoid space. A second gap that was identified was the lack of a simple well-performing gold standard suggesting Latent class modelling as a solution used for other pathogens with an imperfect gold standard.
The current study aims to benchmark different commercial typhoid tests against a defined reference standard applied in multiple population and simultaneously develop a sample set that can be used in future evaluations of emerging technologies and/or to support innovative test development.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rapid diagnostic tests
To evaluate different RDTs that are commercially available internationally for detecting antigens or antibodies to Salmonella Typhi and use blood culture as standard for comparison.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Body weight equals to or more than 8kgs
* History of fever or axillary temperature of \>37.50C for at least 3 consecutive days within the last 7 days prior to enrolment
* Clinical suspicion of enteric fever
* One of the following scenarios:
* Presents to outpatient department or Emergency Department
* Admitted to hospital within last 12 hours
* Able and willing to provide informed consent (and assent when required)
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to provide the required volume of blood
* Unwillingness to provide blood
* Known non-infectious / Non typhoid Infectious causes of fever or other alternate diagnosis of fever
* Taking anticoagulant drugs
* Unconscious
2 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Department for International Development, United Kingdom
OTHER_GOV
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rumina Hasan, M.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
AKU
Robert S Onsare, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kenya Medical Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
KEMRI
Nairobi, , Kenya
Aga Khan University
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sapkota J, Hasan R, Onsare R, Arafah S, Kariuki S, Shakoor S, Qamar F, Mundalo S, Njeru F, Too R, Ndegwa E, Andrews JR, Dittrich S. Comparative Analysis of Commercially Available Typhoid Point-of-Care Tests: Results of a Prospective and Hybrid Retrospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study in Kenya and Pakistan. J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Dec 21;60(12):e0100022. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01000-22. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FE006
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.