MRI for Selection of Complete Responders After Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT04790227
Last Updated: 2022-02-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-01-31
2022-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ART: Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Investigation of Functional Imaging During chemoRadioTherapy
NCT02145416
Application of MRI in Identifying Myelosuppression Risk of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
NCT04970498
Predicting RadIotherapy ReSponse of Rectal Cancer With MRI and PET
NCT02233374
MRI Imaging or CT Abdomen as Standard Work-up Before Treatment Planning for Rectal Cancer?
NCT03463616
68Ga-FAPI-04 PET Imaging in Early Response Evaluation of Rectal Cancer Patients Treated With Immunotherapy
NCT05999227
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recently, a more conservative treatment is advocated in patients who show a good or complete response to neoadjuvant treatment. In 2006, Habr-Gama et al. Presented the long-term results of a prospective trial that investigated a "wait-and-see" policy in a carefully selected group of patients with clinical and radiological evidence of a complete response after neoadjuvant CRT. Results at 5-year follow-up were favorable for the nonsurgical group, with an overall and disease-free survival of 93% and 85%, respectively 3.
Recently, A watch and wait policy avoids the morbidity associated with radical surgery and preserves oncologic outcomes. It could be considered a therapeutic option in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following chemoradiotherapy with a complete clinical response.4 To safely omit surgery, it is essential to select accurately the right candidates, i.e., the true complete responders. This selection is mainly performed using digital examination, endoscopy, and biopsy, but these methods are not infallible.
High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used to assess tumor response before surgical resection. By applying the principals of histopathologic TRG and by exploiting the characteristic MRI low-signal-intensity appearances of fibrosis, it has been possible to develop a similar MRI-based TRG system. The MRI-assessed TRG (mrTRG) was found to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) and DFS.5 Complete pathologic response (pCR) after CRT has led to the proposal of a nonoperative approach as an alternate treatment for highly selected patients with a complete clinical response (CR). Habr-Gama et al reported findings from 99 patients with a clinical CR who were treated with observation alone. The 5-year OS and DFS rates were 93% and 85%, respectively.6 In a recent study, MRI-assessed complete tumor response was strongly correlated with pathologic complete response and, therefore, can be used as a surrogate marker to predict absence of viable tumor cells.7 Recently, Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) could be useful for response evaluation after chemoradiation treatment (8-10) In 2009, Kim et al. showed in a study of 40 patients that DWI in addition to standard MRI significantly improved the performance of radiologists to select complete responders compared with standard MRI only
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MRI
MRI
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Baseline and post treatment MRI scans required for each patient;
* Clinical assessment including digital rectal examination, and endoscopy are needed for each patient
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Yehia Hefz Abd El.wanis
Resident
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Shymaa Abdallah, Lecturer
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assiut University
Hossam Eldin Galal, Proffesor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Assiut University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assuit University
Asyut, , Egypt
Assuit University
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Mohamed Elbaroudy, Lecturer
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V, Das P, Rodel C, Kuo LJ, Calvo FA, Garcia-Aguilar J, Glynne-Jones R, Haustermans K, Mohiuddin M, Pucciarelli S, Small W Jr, Suarez J, Theodoropoulos G, Biondo S, Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL. Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Sep;11(9):835-44. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70172-8. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Proscurshim I, Campos FG, Nadalin W, Kiss D, Gama-Rodrigues J. Patterns of failure and survival for nonoperative treatment of stage c0 distal rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Dec;10(10):1319-28; discussion 1328-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.09.005.
On J, Aly EH. 'Watch and wait' in rectal cancer: summary of the current evidence. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Sep;33(9):1159-1168. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3116-5. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
Patel UB, Taylor F, Blomqvist L, George C, Evans H, Tekkis P, Quirke P, Sebag-Montefiore D, Moran B, Heald R, Guthrie A, Bees N, Swift I, Pennert K, Brown G. Magnetic resonance imaging-detected tumor response for locally advanced rectal cancer predicts survival outcomes: MERCURY experience. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 1;29(28):3753-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.9068. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
Fayaz MS, Demian GA, Fathallah WM, Eissa HE, El-Sherify MS, Abozlouf S, George T, Samir SM. Significance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Assessed Tumor Response for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Preoperative Long-Course Chemoradiation. J Glob Oncol. 2016 Feb 10;2(4):216-221. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2015.001479. eCollection 2016 Aug.
Kim SH, Lee JM, Hong SH, Kim GH, Lee JY, Han JK, Choi BI. Locally advanced rectal cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemo- and radiation therapy. Radiology. 2009 Oct;253(1):116-25. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532090027.
Sun YS, Zhang XP, Tang L, Ji JF, Gu J, Cai Y, Zhang XY. Locally advanced rectal carcinoma treated with preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy: preliminary analysis of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for early detection of tumor histopathologic downstaging. Radiology. 2010 Jan;254(1):170-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2541082230. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
Kremser C, Judmaier W, Hein P, Griebel J, Lukas P, de Vries A. Preliminary results on the influence of chemoradiation on apparent diffusion coefficients of primary rectal carcinoma measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Strahlenther Onkol. 2003 Sep;179(9):641-9. doi: 10.1007/s00066-003-1045-9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MRI Rectum
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.