Lumbopelvic Movement Control: Effect of Injury History, and the Role of Cortical Control and Its Practical Application 1

NCT ID: NCT04786717

Last Updated: 2022-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

41 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-14

Study Completion Date

2022-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Lumbopelvic movement control is crucial for movement stability during weight loading training, and also an important risk factor for the occurrence and recurrence of low back pain (LBP). Previous studies indicated that athletes with LBP had poorer lumbopelvic movement control, and the deficits in lumbopelvic control could be remained after LBP remission. However, there has been no study investigating the effect of LBP history (LBPH) on the performance of the loaded squatting task, and lumbopelvic movement control in people who practice regular weight training.

Therefore, the aims of this study are to examine the differences in lumbopelvic movement control, kinematics and muscle activation during the loaded squatting task in weight training practitioners with LBP, LBPH, and asymptomatic controls, to compare the cortical control mechanisms between 3 types of motor control training strategies, and to investigate the intervention effect of motor control training on restoring the lumbopelvic movement control and squatting performance.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Lumbopelvic movement control is crucial for movement stability during high weight loading training, and also an important risk factor for the occurrence and recurrence of low back pain (LBP). Previous studies indicated that athletes with LBP had poorer lumbopelvic movement control, and for those athletes who have recovered from LBP, some research data still showed that poor lumbopelvic control remained. However, there has been no study investigating the effect of LBP history (LBPH) on the performance of the loaded squatting task, and lumbopelvic movement control in people who practice regular weight training.

Therefore, the aims of this study are to examine the differences in lumbopelvic movement control, kinematics and muscle activation during the loaded squatting task in weight training practitioners with LBP, LBPH, and asymptomatic controls. In the next part of the study, investigators will further investigate the intervention effect of motor control training on restoring the lumbopelvic movement control and squatting performance. Methods: This is an exploratory, cross-sectional, and intervention study. First part: investigators plan to recruit 15 participants between 20-40 years old, practicing loaded squatting for 1 day a week for at least one year, and having LBPH; 15 matched participants with current LBP, and 15 controls for the study. All subjects will undergo a series of squatting task (4 X 10 repetitions) and the kinematics and muscle activation of the rectus abdominus, transverse abdominus/internal obliqus, eractor spinae, and gluteus maximus will be recorded and analyzed using Noraxon myoRESEARCH (Noraxon U.S.A., Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, USA). A set of lumbopelvic movement control tests will also be conducted. The kinematics, muscle activation, and movement control test scores will be compared between groups. The second part, investigators plan to recruit 45 weight training practitioners with LBPH, randomized into three groups (core muscle training, movement control training, combined imagery and movement control training), and compare the effect of 4-week training on squatting performance and lumbopelvic movement control. Statistical analysis: Comparisons of all continuous variables are performed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the intervention effect will be assessed using the repeated measures ANOVA. Chi squared test is used to examine the group differences in lumbopelvic movement control testing. The significance level is set at 0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Biomechanical Phenomena

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

core muscle training

Training the endurance of the core muscle.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

core muscle training

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention of this group will focus on training the endurance of the core muscle.

movement control training

Based from the initial test, the subjects will receive lumbar movement control exercise. They will perform each lumbar movement control exercise in different position.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

movement control training

Intervention Type OTHER

Based from the initial test, the subjects will receive either lumbar flexion control exercise or lumbar extension control exercise. They will perform each lumbar movement control exercise in different position. Starting from the lying position, then progressing to sitting, standing with support, and the last level will be standing without support. Each set of movement will be practiced 10 times, totally 10 sets. It will take approximately 5\~8 minutes to finish each movement. The subjects will learn 5\~8 types of the movement every week.

combined imagery and movement control training

The intervention of this group is mostly same as the movement control training group. The different part is that the first 3 times of the movement will be practiced through image training, and the subjects will practice the real movement in the rest of 7 times.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

combined imagery and movement control training

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention of this group is mostly same as the movement control training group. The different part is that the first 3 times of the movement will be practiced through image training, so the subjects will not have any real movement, and the last 7 times they will perform the lumbar motor control exercise literally. Each set of movement will be practiced 10 times, totally 10 sets. It will take approximately 5\~8 minutes to finish each movement. The subjects will learn 5\~8 types of the movement every week.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

core muscle training

The intervention of this group will focus on training the endurance of the core muscle.

Intervention Type OTHER

movement control training

Based from the initial test, the subjects will receive either lumbar flexion control exercise or lumbar extension control exercise. They will perform each lumbar movement control exercise in different position. Starting from the lying position, then progressing to sitting, standing with support, and the last level will be standing without support. Each set of movement will be practiced 10 times, totally 10 sets. It will take approximately 5\~8 minutes to finish each movement. The subjects will learn 5\~8 types of the movement every week.

Intervention Type OTHER

combined imagery and movement control training

The intervention of this group is mostly same as the movement control training group. The different part is that the first 3 times of the movement will be practiced through image training, so the subjects will not have any real movement, and the last 7 times they will perform the lumbar motor control exercise literally. Each set of movement will be practiced 10 times, totally 10 sets. It will take approximately 5\~8 minutes to finish each movement. The subjects will learn 5\~8 types of the movement every week.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Frequency of weight loading squatting training:

1\. At least 1 time/week, at least 1 year.

LBP group:

1. Present symptoms from T12 to the upper buttock
2. Numerical rating scale (NRS) score ≥ 3/10
3. Present episode of LBP lasting \> 24 hours

LBPH group:

1. Previous symptoms from T12 to the upper buttock
2. Presently in symptom remission
3. At least 2 episodes of LBP in the past 1 year, each lasting \> 24 hours, and following a period of at least 2\~4 weeks pain-free, OR at least 1 episode of LBP, each lasting 2 months.

Asymptomatic controls:

1\. Without any history of LBP that limited their function or required treatment from a health professional in the past 2 years.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Inability to perform parallel-squat due to LBP
2. Pain and ROM limitation in lower extremities
3. LBP due to traumatic injury
4. Previous spine surgery
5. Spinal deformities: HIVD, spondylosis, scoliosis, spinal stenosis
6. Neurological sign, and radiating pain to lower extremities
7. Systematic disease: rheumatoid arthritis
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yi-Fen Shih

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yi-Fen Shih, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Yang Ming University

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

YM110027E(1)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.