Intramuscular Ketorolac at Two Single-Dose Regimens

NCT ID: NCT04763876

Last Updated: 2025-10-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-27

Study Completion Date

2021-02-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a single 15 mg intramuscular (IM) dose of ketorolac for analgesic non-inferiority versus a single 60 mg IM dose for the treatment of acute MSK pain in a military emergency department (ED) that services Department of Defense (DoD), Department of Veteran Affairs (VA), and foreign military beneficiaries

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate a single 15 mg IM dose of ketorolac for analgesic non-inferiority versus a single 60 mg IM dose for the treatment of acute MSK pain in a military ED that services Department of Defense (DoD), Department of Veteran Affairs (VA), and foreign military beneficiaries. The authors chose to evaluate 15 mg rather than the previously identified 10 mg dose for ease of administration as ketorolac is manufactured in 15 mg/mL, 30 mg/mL, and 60 mg/2mL vials in the U.S. The dose of ketorolac served as the primary independent variable for the study and the change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score served as the dependent variable. Prescribing the minimally effective doses of NSAIDs is pertinent to prevent and reduce the number of adverse events. Thus, the secondary outcome assessed for the dose-dependence of subjective and objective adverse events with ketorolac.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Musculoskeletal Pain Analgesia Adverse Event

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Single blinded, randomized, non-inferiority
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
The patient was unaware of the dosage of ketorolac they received.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

15 mg ketorolac intramuscular

Patients who received a single 15 mg dose of ketorolac administered intramuscularly

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ketorolac Injection 15 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

A single dose of 15 mg ketorolac administered intramuscularly.

60 mg ketorolac intramuscular

Patients who received a single 60 mg dose of ketorolac administered intramuscularly

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ketorolac Injection 60 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

A single dose of 60 mg ketorolac administered intramuscularly.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ketorolac Injection 15 mg

A single dose of 15 mg ketorolac administered intramuscularly.

Intervention Type DRUG

Ketorolac Injection 60 mg

A single dose of 60 mg ketorolac administered intramuscularly.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

toradol ketorolac tromethamine ketorolac Toradol ketorolac tromethamine ketorolac

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Tricare beneficiaries between 18-55 years of age
* Triaged as Emergency Severity Index 4 or 5
* Presenting to the William Beaumont Army Medical Center Emergency Department with a chief complaint of acute MSK pain (i.e., general muscular, neck, back, shoulder, arm, forearm, elbow, wrist, finger, hip, knee, thigh, leg, ankle, foot, or digits)
* Pain intensity of 20 mm or greater on a standard 100 mm visual analog scale
* Who the attending provider concurred with ketorolac IM administration for analgesia.

Exclusion Criteria

* Body weight less than 50 kg (110 lbs.)
* Younger than 18 or older than 55 years
* Pregnant or breast feeding
* History of: confirmed, unconfirmed, known, unknown, or suspected peptic ulcer disease, intestinal hemorrhage, renal insufficiency, hepatic insufficiency, cerebrovascular bleeding, hemorrhagic diathesis, incomplete hemostasis, dark stools, bright red blood per rectum, hemoptysis, easy bruising, or high risk of bleeding
* Unable to confidently convey or unknown medical history
* Allergy or hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or aspirin
* Systolic blood pressure \<90 or \>180 mmHg
* Pulse rate \<50 or \>150 beats/min
* Any over-the-counter or prescribed opioid and/or non-opioid analgesic medication (oral, per rectum, topical or parenteral) taken within 12 hours of ED presentation
* Advised by any medical provider to not receive NSAIDs for any reason
* Pain duration greater than 30 days (including acute on chronic pain)
* Refusal to remain in the WBAMC ED for up to 60 minutes after injection of ketorolac
* Patients currently taking anticoagulant medications
* Concurrent use of medications which are contraindicated with concomitant NSAID use (drugs include aspirin, probenecid and pentoxifylline).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

William Beaumont Army Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Edna Rath

Human Protections Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nathaniel J Turner, MPAS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Army Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

William Beaumont Army Medical Center

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

C.2019.088

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.