PRF Based Dressing Versus AQUACEL® for Local Treatment of Skin Graft Donor Site
NCT ID: NCT04749940
Last Updated: 2021-09-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-01
2021-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Comparative Trial of a Modified Polyurethane Dressing and Aquacel
NCT01055925
A Randomized Comparison Study of Aquacel Ag and Glucan II as Donor Site Dressings
NCT00581217
Altrazeal™ Versus Aquacel® Ag for Partial Thickness Skin Donor Sites
NCT01062204
Trial to Compare Intra-individually the Efficacy and Tolerance of Oleogel-S10 Versus Moist Wound Healing Dressing Alone in Accelerating the Epithelialization of Split Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites
NCT01294254
Controlled Comparison of a Traditional Dressing Versus a Biologic Dressing Composed of Fetal Fibroblasts and Keratinocytes in Association With a Collagen Matrix on Skin Donor Sites
NCT03334656
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
3 days after surgery the patients will be asked to complete a VAS questionnaire. A week and 2 weeks after surgery, patients will have their dressing changed as in the first treatment, and will answer VAS(9) and bluebelle(10) questionnaires. The wound will be photographed again for follow-up. Three weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery the scar in the donor area will be evaluated. The photographs will be shown to the blinded evaluator, to evaluate wound healing by epithelialization estimation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
3 days after surgery the patients will be asked to complete a VAS questionnaire. A week and 2 weeks after surgery, patients will have their dressing changed as in the first treatment, and will answer VAS(9) and bluebelle(10) questionnaires. The wound will be photographed again for follow-up. Three weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery the scar in the donor area will be evaluated. The photographs will be shown to the blinded evaluator, to evaluate wound healing by epithelialization estimation.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hospitalized burn patients
Half of the donor site area will be dressed with PRF dressing, and half with Aquacel®.
Half of the harvested area will be dressed with PRF dressing, and half with Aquacel®.
Half of the harvested area will be dressed with PRF dressing, and half with Aquacel®.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Half of the harvested area will be dressed with PRF dressing, and half with Aquacel®.
Half of the harvested area will be dressed with PRF dressing, and half with Aquacel®.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients refusing hospitalization
* Patients with heavily infected wounds, which are the probable cause of bacteremia or sepsis.
* Patients with diabetes mellitus or peripheral vascular disease
* Patients under treatment of steroids or other immunosuppressing agents
* Patients with infectious diseases, i.e., HIV, HCV or HBV.
* Patients who are smokers.
* Patients with a known allergy to the dressing.
* Female patients who are pregnant or nursing, psychiatric patients and soldiers.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rambam Health Care Campus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yehuda Ullmann MD
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rambam health care campus
Haifa, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
1. Peck MD. Epidemiology of burns throughout the world. Part I: Distribution and risk factors. Vol. 37, Burns. Burns; 2011. p. 1087-100. 2. Lee RC, Teven CM. Acute Management of Burn/Electrical Injuries. In: Song DH, editor. Neligen's Plastic Surgery. 4th ed. Elsevier Ltd; 2018. p. 391-423. 3. Ding X, Shi L, Liu C, et al. A randomized comparison study of Aquacel Ag and Alginate Silver as skin graft donor site dressings. Burns. 2013 Dec;39(8):1547-50. 4. Haith LR, Stair Buchmann ME, Ackerman BH, et al. Evaluation of Aquacel Ag for Autogenous Skin Donor Sites. J Burn Care Res. . Nov-Dec 2015;36(6):602-6. 5. Sousa F, Machado V, Botelho J, Proença L, Mendes JJ, Alves R. Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study. Eur J Dent [Internet]. 2020 Feb 1 [cited 2020 Sep 20];14(1):63-9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32168533/ 6. Chou TM, Chang HP, Wang JC. Autologous platelet concentrates in maxillofacial regenerative therapy [Internet]. Vol. 36, Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 20]. p. 305-10. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32052598/ 7. Somani A, Rai R. Comparison of efficacy of autologous platelet-rich fibrin versus saline dressing in chronic venous leg ulcers: A randomised controlled trial. J Cutan Aesthet Surg [Internet]. 2017 Jan 1 [cited 2020 Sep 20];10(1):8-12. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28529414/ 8. Wang L, Liu G, Li Z, Jia BC, Wang Y. Clinical application of platelet-rich fibrin in chronic wounds combined with subcutaneous stalking sinus. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi [Internet]. 2018 Sep 20 [cited 2020 Sep 20];34(9):637-42. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30293368/ 9. Piccin A, Di Pierro AM, Canzian L, Primerano M, Corvetta D, Negri G, et al. Platelet gel: A new therapeutic tool with great potential [Internet]. Vol. 15, Blood Transfusion. SIMTI Servizi Sri; 2017 [cited 2020 Sep 20]. p. 333-40. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27483482/ 10. Ding Y, Cui L, Zhao Q, et al. Platelet-Rich Fibrin Accelerates Skin Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice. Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Sep;79(3):e15-e19. 11. Yüce E, Kömerik N. Potential effects of advanced platelet rich fibrin as a wound-healing accelerator in the management of alveolar osteitis: A randomized clinical trial. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Sep;22(9):1189-1195. 12. Alpan AL, Cin GT. PRF improves wound healing and postoperative discomfort after harvesting subepithelial connective tissue graft from palate: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jan;24(1):425-436. 13. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis [Internet]. 1978 [cited 2020 Sep 20];37(4):378-81. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/686873/ 14. Macefield R, Blazeby J, Reeves B, Brookes S, Avery K, Rogers C, et al. Validation of the Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire for assessment of surgical-site infection in closed primary wounds after hospital discharge. BJS [Internet]. 2019 Feb 17 [cited 2020 Sep 20];106(3):226-35. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bjs.11008
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0007-21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.