Effect of Mirtazapine Versus Placebo in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Anorexia
NCT ID: NCT04748523
Last Updated: 2023-04-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
86 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-08-29
2022-10-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Currently, comprehensive treatments of cancer patients recognize the importance of the assessment of nutritional status, and the impact it has on the prognosis, quality of life and toxicity generated by cancer treatment. Due to this, it is imperative to offer diagnostic tools that identify patients in a timely manner and, in addition to this, offer therapeutic strategies for the improvement of nutritional status, in an adjuvant manner to their oncological treatment.
It is widely recognized that the cachexia-anorexia syndrome (CACS) is present in 30 to 80% of cases in cancer patients and this proportion increases as the disease progresses, with weight loss being a powerful predictor of shorter survival. Unfortunately, current therapies available to treat anorexia and / or cancer-associated cachexia offer only partial results, mainly because the intervention is late and the development of an earlier and more effective intervention is still sought. Mirtazapine has recently gained attention not only because of its antidepressant effect, but also because of its potential benefit in patients with anorexia and weight loss, recently reported in a phase II study. Therefore, it is important to continue its evaluation through a randomized, double-blind clinical trial in which the effect of mirtazapine is compared and it is determined if it is superior compared to placebo to increase appetite in patients with NSCLC who present with anorexia.
This type of strategy is a relevant therapeutic option in those patients in whom nutritional counseling by itself is not sufficient to counteract the damage caused by anorexia and to cope with or prevent the development of cachexia.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Mirtazapine on Appetite in Advanced Cancer Patients
NCT00488072
Combination Therapy for Cancer Related Fatigue in Patients With Metastatic Cancers
NCT06085716
Computerized Questionnaires in Assessing Symptoms, Pain, Depression, and Physical Function in Patients With Metastatic and/or Advanced Locoregional Cancer
NCT00972634
Early Palliative Care With Standard Care or Standard Care Alone in Improving Quality of Life of Patients With Incurable Lung or Non-colorectal Gastrointestinal Cancer and Their Family Caregivers
NCT02349412
New Assessment System in Measuring Symptom Distress in Cancer Patients
NCT00505245
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Mirtazapine is a tetracyclic antidepressant which has been widely used for the treatment of depression. Several clinical studies have proven its efficacy in this indication, with more than 5000 patients endorsing its clinical effect compared to placebo, other tetracyclic antidepressants and trazodone. In addition to its effect on mood, it has been observed that mirtazapine, used in standard doses, induces weight gain, increasing appetite and food consumption compared to patients receiving placebo.
The increase in appetite with consequent weight gain and increased food intake may be due to the blocking of 5HT1b, 5-HT2, 5-HT3, H1 receptors, involved in the regulation of appetite. A pilot study of 2 doses of mirtazapine (15 or 30 mg per day) in ambulatory cancer patients with pain and other discomforts suggests that it provides a significant improvement in quality of life, particularly in weight and energy intake. Recently, another phase II study observed that 57% of oncology patients, ambulatory, non-depressed, increased their appetite and body weight when treated with mirtazapine for 4 weeks. Despite these encouraging data, the study included a small sample of patients, so it is not possible to generate robust conclusions from these data.
The objective of this protocol is to conduct a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the effect of Mirtazapine on appetite, nutritional status and quality of life in patients with anorexia associated with lung cancer. The sample would include 86 patients, 43 patients with Mirtazapine and 43 sith placebo for 8 weeks, with an inducing dose of 15 mg to a máximum of 30 mg. The methodology for conducting this study consists of recruiting patients diagnosed with anorexia according to the anorexia-cachexia (ACS) scale, which has a cut-off point specifically validated for lung cáncer. Once the patient is selected, they are invited to participate in the study and an informed consent is requested. Subsequently a subjective global evaluation is performed, a 24-hour reminder of energy consumption, evaluation of anthropometric measures (weight, height,% weight loss, body mass index), evaluation of body composition (% fat, fat-free mass and phase angle), common gastrointestinal adverse effects of chemotherapy according to CTCAE, an evaluation of anxiety and depression (HADS) , as well as determination of quality of life through the questionnaire "The European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) -C30 and (QLQ) LC-13", validated for Mexican population.
All determinations will be made at baseline, at 4 and at 8 weeks. All the variables are going to be evaluated inside each groups and between groups. It´s going to be considered significant p ≤ 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
arm to receive 15 to 30 mg of Mirtazapine for a period of 8 weeks.
Mirtazapine
arm to receive 15 to 30 mg of Mirtazapine for a period of 8 weeks.
Placebo group
arm to receive 15 to 30 mg of placebo for a period of 8 weeks.
Placebo Oral Tablet
arm to receive 15 to 30 mg of Placebo for a period of 8 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mirtazapine
arm to receive 15 to 30 mg of Mirtazapine for a period of 8 weeks.
Placebo Oral Tablet
arm to receive 15 to 30 mg of Placebo for a period of 8 weeks.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A score ≤ 32 on the cachexia anorexia scale or ≥ 5% weight loss in the last month.
* Good performance status (ECOG 0-2)
* That they are receiving chemotherapy as standard treatment or tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immunotherapy.
* Have a life expectancy\> 8 weeks.
* Accept and sign informed consent letter.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are treated with antidepressants
* Patients who are under treatment with megestrol acetate
* Patients with moderate hepatic and / or renal dysfunction (bilirubin level ≥ 1.5 x above normal limits (UNL), AST and ALT ≥ 5 x UNL, or creatinine ≥5 x UNL).
* Those unable to take medication orally.
* Patients with mechanical obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract, ascites or generalized edema.
* Patients with a history of phenylketonuria (preparation contains phenylalanine).
* Patients with delirium.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Oscar Gerardo Arrieta Rodríguez
M.D.,M.Sc.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Oscar G Arrieta Rodriguez, M.D., M.Sc.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de México
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia
Mexico City, , Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
Watanabe H, Yamamoto N, Tamura T, Shimoyama T, Hotta K, Inoue A, Sawada M, Akiyama Y, Kusaba H, Nokihara H, Sekine I, Kunitoh H, Ohe Y, Kodama T, Saijo N. Study of paclitaxel and dose escalation of cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2003 Dec;33(12):626-30. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyg116.
Sarhill N, Mahmoud FA, Christie R, Tahir A. Assessment of nutritional status and fluid deficits in advanced cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2003 Nov-Dec;20(6):465-73. doi: 10.1177/104990910302000610.
Arrieta O, Michel Ortega RM, Villanueva-Rodriguez G, Serna-Thome MG, Flores-Estrada D, Diaz-Romero C, Rodriguez CM, Martinez L, Sanchez-Lara K. Association of nutritional status and serum albumin levels with development of toxicity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with paclitaxel-cisplatin chemotherapy: a prospective study. BMC Cancer. 2010 Feb 21;10:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-50.
Sanchez-Lara K, Turcott JG, Juarez E, Guevara P, Nunez-Valencia C, Onate-Ocana LF, Flores D, Arrieta O. Association of nutrition parameters including bioelectrical impedance and systemic inflammatory response with quality of life and prognosis in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective study. Nutr Cancer. 2012;64(4):526-34. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2012.668744. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
Wie GA, Cho YA, Kim SY, Kim SM, Bae JM, Joung H. Prevalence and risk factors of malnutrition among cancer patients according to tumor location and stage in the National Cancer Center in Korea. Nutrition. 2010 Mar;26(3):263-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2009.04.013. Epub 2009 Aug 8.
Ross PJ, Ashley S, Norton A, Priest K, Waters JS, Eisen T, Smith IE, O'Brien ME. Do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for lung cancers? Br J Cancer. 2004 May 17;90(10):1905-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601781.
Slaviero KA, Read JA, Clarke SJ, Rivory LP. Baseline nutritional assessment in advanced cancer patients receiving palliative chemotherapy. Nutr Cancer. 2003;46(2):148-57. doi: 10.1207/S15327914NC4602_07.
Muscaritoli M, Anker SD, Argiles J, Aversa Z, Bauer JM, Biolo G, Boirie Y, Bosaeus I, Cederholm T, Costelli P, Fearon KC, Laviano A, Maggio M, Rossi Fanelli F, Schneider SM, Schols A, Sieber CC. Consensus definition of sarcopenia, cachexia and pre-cachexia: joint document elaborated by Special Interest Groups (SIG) "cachexia-anorexia in chronic wasting diseases" and "nutrition in geriatrics". Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;29(2):154-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.12.004. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
Marin Caro MM, Laviano A, Pichard C. Impact of nutrition on quality of life during cancer. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2007 Jul;10(4):480-7. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e3281e2c983.
Kosacka M, Werynska B, Golecki M, Jankowska R, Passowicz-Muszynska E. [The incidence and pathogenesis of cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome in lung cancer]. Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2008;76(5):360-5. Polish.
Laviano A, Meguid MM, Inui A, Muscaritoli M, Rossi-Fanelli F. Therapy insight: Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome--when all you can eat is yourself. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005 Mar;2(3):158-65. doi: 10.1038/ncponc0112.
Dewys WD, Begg C, Lavin PT, Band PR, Bennett JM, Bertino JR, Cohen MH, Douglass HO Jr, Engstrom PF, Ezdinli EZ, Horton J, Johnson GJ, Moertel CG, Oken MM, Perlia C, Rosenbaum C, Silverstein MN, Skeel RT, Sponzo RW, Tormey DC. Prognostic effect of weight loss prior to chemotherapy in cancer patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Med. 1980 Oct;69(4):491-7. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(05)80001-3.
Martin L, Senesse P, Gioulbasanis I, Antoun S, Bozzetti F, Deans C, Strasser F, Thoresen L, Jagoe RT, Chasen M, Lundholm K, Bosaeus I, Fearon KH, Baracos VE. Diagnostic criteria for the classification of cancer-associated weight loss. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):90-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.1894. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
LeBlanc TW, Samsa GP, Wolf SP, Locke SC, Cella DF, Abernethy AP. Validation and real-world assessment of the Functional Assessment of Anorexia-Cachexia Therapy (FAACT) scale in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and the cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS). Support Care Cancer. 2015 Aug;23(8):2341-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2606-z. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
Gupta D, Lammersfeld CA, Vashi PG, King J, Dahlk SL, Grutsch JF, Lis CG. Bioelectrical impedance phase angle in clinical practice: implications for prognosis in stage IIIB and IV non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer. 2009 Jan 28;9:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-37.
Bossola M, Pacelli F, Doglietto GB. Novel treatments for cancer cachexia. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2007 Aug;16(8):1241-53. doi: 10.1517/13543784.16.8.1241.
Munzer A, Sack U, Mergl R, Schonherr J, Petersein C, Bartsch S, Kirkby KC, Bauer K, Himmerich H. Impact of antidepressants on cytokine production of depressed patients in vitro. Toxins (Basel). 2013 Nov 19;5(11):2227-40. doi: 10.3390/toxins5112227.
Langer CJ, Hoffman JP, Ottery FD. Clinical significance of weight loss in cancer patients: rationale for the use of anabolic agents in the treatment of cancer-related cachexia. Nutrition. 2001 Jan;17(1 Suppl):S1-20. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(01)80001-0. No abstract available.
Capra S, Ferguson M, Ried K. Cancer: impact of nutrition intervention outcome--nutrition issues for patients. Nutrition. 2001 Sep;17(9):769-72. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(01)00632-3.
Anttila SA, Leinonen EV. A review of the pharmacological and clinical profile of mirtazapine. CNS Drug Rev. 2001 Fall;7(3):249-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3458.2001.tb00198.x.
Hilas O, Avena-Woods C. Potential role of mirtazapine in underweight older adults. Consult Pharm. 2014 Feb;29(2):124-30. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2014.124.
Kumar N, Barai S, Gambhir S, Rastogi N. Effect of Mirtazapine on Gastric Emptying in Patients with Cancer-associated Anorexia. Indian J Palliat Care. 2017 Jul-Sep;23(3):335-337. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_17_17.
Lopez-Llera M. Eclampsia and fetal sex. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1990 Nov;33(3):211-3. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(90)90003-4.
Arrieta O, Cardenas-Fernandez D, Rodriguez-Mayoral O, Gutierrez-Torres S, Castanares D, Flores-Estrada D, Reyes E, Lopez D, Barragan P, Soberanis Pina P, Cardona AF, Turcott JG. Mirtazapine as Appetite Stimulant in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Anorexia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2024 Mar 1;10(3):305-314. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5232.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Mirtazapine
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.