Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20184 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-25
2023-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Genetic Risk: Whether, When, and How to Tell Adolescents
NCT03421327
Genomic Medicine Risk Assessment Care for Everyone - Implementation Phase
NCT06278883
Genetic Factors and Interrelationships for Cancer Risk-Related Behaviors and Complex Traits
NCT00001500
Evaluation of a Decision Aid for Incidental Genomic Findings
NCT03244202
Clinical Integration of Genetic Risk Assessment in Family Medicine
NCT00339794
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Compare the efficacy and implementation of two strategies for identifying members of a primary care clinic's population who have a family or personal history of cancer and offering high-risk individuals to obtain genetic testing for cancer susceptibility mutations in a randomized trial. The two methods are: 1) Point of Care (POC) approach: A tablet-based screening for family/personal history of cancer will be offered to all patients aged 25 and up coming in for a routine appointment at the clinic. 2) Direct Patient Engagement (DPE): Emails and letters will be sent to all individuals aged 25 and older in a clinic's population, inviting them to visit a web site for screening for family /personal history of cancer. In both strategies, those determined to be high-risk will receive online education about genetic testing and an invitation to obtain such testing through a web-based platform. Randomization will occur at the clinic level, with half of the clinics using the POC approach and the other half using DPE. Outcomes will be the fraction of the active clinic patient population that completes screening and the fraction of the active clinic patient population that undergoes testing.
Hypothesis 1: DPE screening will result in a higher proportion of active patients who screen for familial cancer risk compared with POC screening.
Hypothesis 2: Of screened patients, POC patients will produce a higher proportion of tested patients compared with DPE.
2. Identify changes, problems, and inefficiencies in clinical flow and interactions during and after the implementation of genomic testing for cancer risk across primary care clinics.
3. Evaluate the effects of two methods of implementation of genomic screening for cancer risk on patient, provider, and health system leader reports of benefits and harms, satisfaction, perceived quality of care, including across gender, racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and genetic literacy divides.
4. Evaluate the value (cost-effectiveness) and affordability (budget impact) of each screening strategy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Point of Care
For clinics in the point of care (POC) arm, patients will be approached at the time they come in to the clinic for a routine visit with their primary care provider. We will screen patients for familial cancer risk using electronic tablets in the waiting room or, in the case of a telehealth visit, through telephone contact before the visit. Patients identified as high risk will be offered genetic testing for a panel of hereditary cancers.
Population-level screening
The study intervention involves having patients complete a familial cancer risk assessment survey. Those who are found to be at high risk will be offered genetic testing for a panel of hereditary cancers. A "previvor" plan will be created to assist patients and their providers in completing the appropriate follow-up for those with a mutation identified.
Direct Patient Engagement
For clinics in the direct patient engagement (DPE) arm, patients will be identified by reviewing clinic records to create an "active" patient list (i.e., those who have had a visit in the past year). We will contact patients by postal mail and email to provide a link to the online risk screening tool. The patient outreach is not tied to a specific visit and the online screening can be completed at any time. Patients identified as high risk will be offered genetic testing for a panel of hereditary cancers.
Population-level screening
The study intervention involves having patients complete a familial cancer risk assessment survey. Those who are found to be at high risk will be offered genetic testing for a panel of hereditary cancers. A "previvor" plan will be created to assist patients and their providers in completing the appropriate follow-up for those with a mutation identified.
Stakeholder Interviews and Surveys
Samples of patients, providers, and clinic leaders will be assessed at several points throughout the study - baseline and follow-up. We will use a mixed methods approach, with both quantitative assessments (surveys) and qualitative assessments (interviews). Baseline assessments will provide initial data on the patient population and current clinic functioning and help in implementation planning. The final assessments will provide estimates of change in patients, providers, and clinic leaders as a result of the implementation.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Population-level screening
The study intervention involves having patients complete a familial cancer risk assessment survey. Those who are found to be at high risk will be offered genetic testing for a panel of hereditary cancers. A "previvor" plan will be created to assist patients and their providers in completing the appropriate follow-up for those with a mutation identified.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* An active patient at a participating clinic (had at least one visit in the past 12 months)
* Comfortable reading and writing in English
25 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
University of Washington
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Elizabeth Swisher
Gynecologic oncologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elizabeth M Swisher, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Washington
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Billings Clinic
Billings, Montana, United States
MultiCare Health System
Tacoma, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Swisher EM, Harris HM, Knerr S, Theoryn TN, Norquist BM, Brant J, Shirts BH, Beers F, Cameron D, Dusic EJ, Riemann LA, Devine B, Raff ML, Kadel R, Cabral HJ, Wang C. Strategies to Assess Risk for Hereditary Cancer in Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250185. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0185.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RG1123410
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
STUDY00009476
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.