Reducing Adolescent Pregnancy in the Emergency Department
NCT ID: NCT04744155
Last Updated: 2023-09-28
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
37 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-05-12
2023-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Reducing Adolescent Pregnancy
NCT04120376
Reducing Teen Pregnancy in the Emergency Department
NCT03866811
Evaluation of the Efficacy of the AIM (Adult Identity Mentoring) 4 Teen Moms Program
NCT01456091
Improving Shared Decision-Making in Menstrual Management and Contraception for Adolescents and Young Adults
NCT07320651
momHealth: Multiple Health Behavior Change Intervention in Teen Pregnancy & Parenting Using Mobile Technology
NCT03382132
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
As adolescent access to affordable, confidential contraceptive care has worsened in recent years, one approach to increase access is to utilize non-traditional settings, such as Emergency Departments (EDs). The Society for Academic Medicine recognizes the ED as an "effective site for preventive care," evidenced by organizational conferences, consensus statements, and specialized training opportunities to reduce disparities stemming from social determinants of health. Adolescents make 19 million ED visits annually, commonly for non-urgent or reproductive complaints; for many, this may be their only contact with a provider. Adolescents in the ED frequently report unprotected intercourse. The pregnancy risk index (PRI), an estimate of pregnancy risk in the subsequent 12 months, for adolescent females in two EDs was more than three times greater than the national average. Lacking a primary provider was associated with higher PRI scores. While the need for reproductive care is evident, the majority of ED-based studies have focused on screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including HIV and a few, primarily single-site studies have reported on acceptability of hypothetical reproductive care. Among the few addressing pregnancy prevention, most focused on emergency contraception or increasing clinic referral, with mixed results. A small open trial provided counseling and clinic referral for those wanting to initiate contraception. Only 22% completed the referral and one was found to be pregnant at her first clinic visit. Lack of transportation was the most common reason for not completing referral. Because interventions to address multi-level barriers and increase contraception access are sorely needed, the investigator aims to evaluate the feasibility of a novel ED-based intervention, utilizing a mixed methods approach.
Scientific Premise: Many adolescents in the ED are at high-risk of pregnancy yet accepting of reproductive intervention; however, no work describes best practices for ED-based contraceptive provision. Thus, the investigator proposes a randomized trial to evaluate MLI, which includes ED-based contraceptive initiation (i.e., oral pill, transdermal patch, vaginal ring, injection, or subdermal implant) vs. eSOC, for adolescents in two EDs utilizing APPs in a collaborative care model. Thus, the investigator will use a rigorous framework from Bowen et al. to evaluate feasibility constructs (see Table 1 for construct definitions) among adolescents and organizational personnel (i.e., study Advanced Practice Practitioners (APPs), adolescent medicine specialists, ED nursing and Reducing Adolescent Pregnancy in the Emergency Department leaders) in two unique EDs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Multi-Level Intervention
All adolescents receive the Motivational Interviewing (MI) enhanced counseling and clinic referral.Those randomized to MLI will be offered immediate, ED-based contraception (i.e., oral pill, transdermal patch, vaginal ring, injection, subdermal implant) in addition to receive a warm referral (provider helping to schedule follow-up appointment) to follow-up on selected method (or to initiate in clinic, if preferred)
Multi-Level Intervention
Behavioral intervention that assesses uptake of contraception and seeks follow-up care.
Enhanced Standard of Care
All adolescents receive the Motivational Interviewing (MI) enhanced counseling and clinic referral. eSOC participants may obtain contraception only at the referral.
Enhanced Standard of Care
Behavioral intervention that assesses uptake of contraception from follow-up care.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Multi-Level Intervention
Behavioral intervention that assesses uptake of contraception and seeks follow-up care.
Enhanced Standard of Care
Behavioral intervention that assesses uptake of contraception from follow-up care.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Do not desire pregnancy
* Not using intrauterine device (IUD) or Sub-dermal Implant
* English-speaking
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient has a developmental delay limiting participation
* Patient is presenting in the ED after sexual assault
* Patient is too ill to be screened
15 Years
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
NIH
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
NIH
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Melissa Miller
Study Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Mercy Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00001169
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.