Project CHOICES Efficacy Study

NCT ID: NCT00153478

Last Updated: 2005-09-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

1200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-07-31

Study Completion Date

2004-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Project CHOICES Efficacy Study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a brief motivational intervention aimed at reducing alcohol-exposed pregnancies(AEP)in high-risk preconceptional women. The study is a multi-site collaborative study between the CDC and three universities. The hypothesis of the study is that a greater proportion of women will reduce thier risk of having an alcohol-exposed pregnancy after participating in the Information Plus Counseling (IPC) intervention than do those in the Information Only(IO) control group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Women at high risk for an AEP are define as sexually active, fertile women who are drinking more than 7 drinks per week and/or 5 or more drinks on any one day, and are noy using effective measures to prevent pregnancy. Participants will be recruited from community-based setting previously shown to have increased proportions of women at risk for AEP. Women in the intervention group (IPC) will receive 4 counselling sessions that include personal feedback on AEP risk behaviors drawn from baseline information,consequences of alcohol use in pregnancy, assessing readiness to change risk behaviors, pros and cons of risk drinking and unprotected intercourse, goal setting to reduce risk behaviors, and a consultation visit with a family planning provider to discuss appropriate choices for pregnancy prevention based on clinical assessment. Clients are counseled that there are two routes to reducing AEP risk, alcohol reduction or pregnancy prevention, with the ideal being both. Women in the control group (IO) will receive an informational brochure that addresses healthy lifestyle behaviors, including alcohol use, and a list of referral sources for health care treatment and alcohol abuse treatment. Both groups will be assessed at baseline using a full battery of measures that include alcohol and contraceptive use with follow-up measures at 3, 6, and 9 months after baseline.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Risk for an Alcohol-Exposed Pregnancy Hazardous Alcohol Use Risk for Unintended Pregnancy

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Alcohol-Exposed Pregnancy Binge drinking Frequent drinking Unintended pregnancy Fetal Alcohol Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Brief Motivational Counseling

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-


\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

44 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rosa L Floyd, DSN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Mark B Sobell, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nova Southeastern University

Mary V. Velasquez, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Karen Ingersol, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Virginia Commonwealth University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Broward County Health District Primary Care Centers

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Media Recruited Participants from Broward County

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plane State Jail

Dayton, Texas, United States

Site Status

Career and Recovery

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Door to Recovery

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Harris County Jail

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston Recovery Campus

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

New Directions

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sally's House

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Medicaid Helath Maintenance Organization

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Outpatient Gynecology Clinic-Virginia Commonwealth Univ

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CDC-NCBDDD-3271

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id