Clinical Study Evaluating the Proper Surgical Safety Margin for Early Stage Oral Tongue Cancers
NCT ID: NCT04738786
Last Updated: 2025-05-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
125 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-18
2025-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Summary:
A current standard primary treatment for oral tongue cancer is a curative surgical resection with/without adjuvant radiation treatments (or chemoradiation).
In pathological analysis of surgical specimens, more than 5 mm of non-tumorous tissues from the tumor border is regarded as a safe negative resection margin, according to the NCCN guideline (the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Dec 10. 2020). To achieve this clear margin, surgeons are apt to use a 1.0 to 1.5 cm safety margin around the gross tumor during surgery, considering 30-50% tumor shrinkage in tissue fixation process.
Many previous retrospective data have been reported to suggest the optimal or proper surgical extent for oral tongue cancer. Wider resection can lead to better local control, however, it sacrifices more normal tissue, resulting in the functional deficit of tongue (speech and swallowing), even with reconstruction.
Unfortunately up to now, no prospective comparison of a different surgical safety margin for oral tongue cancer have been conducted to draw a more solid conclusion. Particularly in early stage oral tongue cancer (cT1-2N0), some study results have suggested that less than 5 mm resection margin in pathology specimens can be also safe and effective in terms of tumor control.
To achieve a well-grounded result about the proper surgical safety margin in early stage (cT1-2N0) oral tongue cancer, we will compare the outcomes of the two (1.5 cm versus 1.0 cm) surgical safety margin in curative resection for cT1-2N0 oral tongue cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Cryoablation with Robotic Bronchoscopy System in Patients with Lung Cancer
NCT06832956
Feasibility of Mutational Analysis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Using Low-volume Lung Aspirates
NCT01482572
Stereotactic Radiosurgery Followed by Wedge Resection in Treating Patients With Early Stage Peripheral Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT02250378
Meaning of Recovery After Lung Cancer Surgery
NCT05453812
Microwave Ablation in the Treatment of Stage I Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT02896166
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* The randomized allocation table was made by stratified block randomization methods with 1:1 ratio according to each participating surgeon and tumor stage.
* Baseline number (BN) should be provided to the subjects in the order of the date of surgery.
Surgical Procedure
* The study includes T1-2N0 oral tongue cancer patients. For the management of the primary lesion, wide resection with 1.0- or 1.5-cm surgical safety margin should be performed according to the results of study allocation.
* Neck management can be resection of primary tumor without neck dissection, with ipsilateral or bilateral neck dissection (guided by tumor location) or with sentinel lymph node biopsy, according to the NCCN guideline (version 1.2021).
Evaluation of the surgical safety margin
* The surgical safety margin should be meticulously evaluated in the pathology specimens in all directions.
* The surgical margins less than 0.3 or 0.5 cm in final pathology results are considered as the close surgical margin.
Adjuvant Treatment
* The adjuvant treatments either radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy are conducted if indicated following the NCCN guideline.
* The follow-up after completion of the definitive treatment are made following the NCCN guideline.
Efficacy evaluation
* The primary outcomes are determined with 2-year local control rates after the completion of the curative treatments.
* The secondary outcomes are determined with the 5-year disease-free survival rates and speech/articulation functional analysis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Wide surgical safety margin
1.5 cm safety margin surgery for cT1-2N0 oral tongue cancer
1.5 cm surgical safety margin for cT1-2N0 oral tongue cancers
Surgical resection including 1.5 cm normal tissue around the gross tumors
Definition of safety margin: A surgical safety margin is defined as the margin of apparently non-tumorous tissue around a tumor that has been surgically removed (Resected normal-looking tissues from the gross tumor border). The surgical safety margin is applied to all directions of 3-dimensional tumors (mucosal and deep side).
Narrow surgical safety margin
1.0 cm safety margin surgery for cT1-2N0 oral tongue cancer
1.0 cm surgical safety margin for cT1-2N0 oral tongue cancers
Surgical resection including 1.0 cm normal tissue around the gross tumors
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
1.5 cm surgical safety margin for cT1-2N0 oral tongue cancers
Surgical resection including 1.5 cm normal tissue around the gross tumors
Definition of safety margin: A surgical safety margin is defined as the margin of apparently non-tumorous tissue around a tumor that has been surgically removed (Resected normal-looking tissues from the gross tumor border). The surgical safety margin is applied to all directions of 3-dimensional tumors (mucosal and deep side).
1.0 cm surgical safety margin for cT1-2N0 oral tongue cancers
Surgical resection including 1.0 cm normal tissue around the gross tumors
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Stage cT1-2N0M0 tumors
* Treatment-naïve tumor
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification 1-3.
* Patients who give a written informed consent voluntarily.
Exclusion Criteria
* Recurrent tumors or salvage surgery
* Patients who have had a previous head and neck surgery and radiation treatment.
* Patients who have other head and neck cancer, within the last 5 years.
20 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Seoul National University Hospital
OTHER
Asan Medical Center
OTHER
Ajou University School of Medicine
OTHER
National Cancer Center, Korea
OTHER_GOV
Inje University
OTHER
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
OTHER
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
OTHER
Dong-A University Hospital
OTHER
Samsung Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Han-Sin Jeong
Director of Head and Neck Cancer Center
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Han-Sin Jeong, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Head and Neck Cancer Center, Samsung Medical Center, Korea
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Ajou university School of Medicine
Suwon, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jang JY, Choi N, Ko YH, Chung MK, Son YI, Baek CH, Baek KH, Jeong HS. Differential Impact of Close Surgical Margin on Local Recurrence According to Primary Tumor Size in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;24(6):1698-1706. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5497-4. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020-08-012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.