Cervical Plexus Block Combined With Translaryngeal Block for Tracheostomy

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

29 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-01

Study Completion Date

2020-11-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Current healthcare delivery models emphasize enhanced postoperative recovery (ERAS) with minimal morbidity and shorter hospital stays. Most tracheostomy cases are tumour patients. The more the patients have difficulty in breathing, the more difficult it is to anaesthetize them. Adequate intraoperative anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia with minimal sedation play an essential role in this patient model. In tracheostomy patients, moving away from the general anaesthesia option increases airway safety, and avoiding the local anaesthesia option in the incision area increases patient comfort. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of regional anaesthesia in tracheostomy patients.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

The Perioperative Analgesic Efficiency of Bilateral Superficial Cervical Plexus Block in Patients With Thyroidectomy

NCT02680353

Block

COMPLETED NA

Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Tracheal Reconstruction Surgery:

NCT04567992

Efficiency of Using Ultrasound-guided SCB for Providing Intra and Postoperative Analgesiatracheal Reconstruction Surgery

COMPLETED NA

Costoclavicular Blockage for Upper Limb Surgery

NCT04757896

Anesthesia

COMPLETED NA

Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Superficial Cervical Plexus Block in Patients Undergoing Total Thyroidectomy.

NCT04993521

Analgesia Obtained With a Local Wound Infiltration of Lidocain Analgesia Obtained With a Ultrasound Guided Cervical Plexus Block Using Lidocain Postoperative Pain

COMPLETED NA

The Efficacy of Superficial Cervical Block Application in Postoperative Analgesia Management in Patients Undergoing Total Laryngectomy and Bilateral Neck Dissection

NCT06852651

Laryngeal Neoplasm

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

after being informed and about the study and potential risks, all patients giving written informed consent will undergo 24 hours screening period to determine the eligilibity for study entry. After a computer-generated randomization list with a 1:1 intergroup ratio, ensuring equal distribution in the two groups, 30 opaque sealed envelopes numbered 1-30 were prepared. The patients were randomly divided into the Group with bilateral CPB with 15 ml 0.5% bupivacaine or the patients with translaryngeal block with 5 ml 2% lidocaine in addition to bilateral CPB.

CPB: cervical plexus block.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Regional Anesthesia Morbidity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

the new indication for cervical plexus block.

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ST (superficial cervical plexus block combined with Translareyngeal block)

Superficial cervical plexus block combined with Translareyngeal block Group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ST

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After a computer-generated randomization list with a 1:1 intergroup ratio, ensuring equal distribution in the two groups, 30 opaque sealed envelopes numbered 1-30 were prepared. The patients were randomly divided into the Group with bilateral CPB with 15 ml 0.5% bupivacaine or the patients with translaryngeal block with 5 ml 2% lidocaine in addition to bilateral CPB.

Following inclusion, two research assistants, with no further involvement in the study, prepared 15mL syringes and 5 ml syringes according to the envelope's specifications. The syringes were marked with the patient's randomization number. All other investigators, staff, and patients were blinded to group allocations. Before surgery, the patients were transferred to the specified block room area monitored with 3-lead electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, and non-invasive blood pressure. All patients had two intravenous cannula lines, and then bilateral CPB block procedures were performed in awake non-sedated patients.

S (superficial cervical plexus block)

Superficial cervical plexus block Group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ST

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After a computer-generated randomization list with a 1:1 intergroup ratio, ensuring equal distribution in the two groups, 30 opaque sealed envelopes numbered 1-30 were prepared. The patients were randomly divided into the Group with bilateral CPB with 15 ml 0.5% bupivacaine or the patients with translaryngeal block with 5 ml 2% lidocaine in addition to bilateral CPB.

Following inclusion, two research assistants, with no further involvement in the study, prepared 15mL syringes and 5 ml syringes according to the envelope's specifications. The syringes were marked with the patient's randomization number. All other investigators, staff, and patients were blinded to group allocations. Before surgery, the patients were transferred to the specified block room area monitored with 3-lead electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, and non-invasive blood pressure. All patients had two intravenous cannula lines, and then bilateral CPB block procedures were performed in awake non-sedated patients.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ST

After a computer-generated randomization list with a 1:1 intergroup ratio, ensuring equal distribution in the two groups, 30 opaque sealed envelopes numbered 1-30 were prepared. The patients were randomly divided into the Group with bilateral CPB with 15 ml 0.5% bupivacaine or the patients with translaryngeal block with 5 ml 2% lidocaine in addition to bilateral CPB.

Following inclusion, two research assistants, with no further involvement in the study, prepared 15mL syringes and 5 ml syringes according to the envelope's specifications. The syringes were marked with the patient's randomization number. All other investigators, staff, and patients were blinded to group allocations. Before surgery, the patients were transferred to the specified block room area monitored with 3-lead electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, and non-invasive blood pressure. All patients had two intravenous cannula lines, and then bilateral CPB block procedures were performed in awake non-sedated patients.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Being in the age range of 18-65, with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification I-III and scheduled for elective or emergency tracheostomy.
* A sufficient level of education to understand the study procedures and agree to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* inability to cooperate
* dementia,
* allergy to local anesthetics and opioids
* regular daily opioid requirements
* abuse of alcohol or medication
* local infection at the site of injection or systemic infection,
* pregnancy.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No