BRAF Inhibitor Encorafenib And Cetuximab Real Life Investigation of Next Generation CRC Treatment

NCT ID: NCT04673955

Last Updated: 2022-09-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-03

Study Completion Date

2027-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The presence of a BRAFV600E mutation is a marker of poor prognosis in patients with mCRC and associated with a median overall survival (mOS) of approximately 12 to 14 months compared to 20 to 25 months for patients with BRAF wild-type tumours. After 1st line therapy, treatment outcomes with standard therapy are poor in patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC, with response rates (ORR) of ≤ 11%, a median progression-free survival (mPFS) between 1.8 and 2.8 months, and a mOS between 4.1 and 6.2 months. Failure to achieve adequate survival outcomes with standard treatment regimens in patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC has encouraged efforts to combine multiple targeted therapies: With 665 randomized patients, the BEACON CRC trial represents the largest trial and is currently the only phase III study in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC.

BERING CRC - designed as a prospective (allowing initial retrospective documentation), longitudinal, non-interventional study - will investigate the real-world effectiveness, quality of life, safety and tolerability of encorafenib and cetuximab in BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC patients, who have received prior systemic therapy. Data from this study will contribute to a deeper understanding and characterization to the everyday use of encorafenib and cetuximab in a broader patient population in the German, Austrian, and Swiss routine setting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The presence of a BRAFV600E mutation is a marker of poor prognosis in patients with mCRC and associated with a median overall survival (mOS) of approximately 12 to 14 months compared to 20 to 25 months for pa-tients with BRAF wild-type tumors. After 1st line therapy, treatment out-comes with standard therapy are poor in patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC, with response rates (ORR) of ≤ 11%, a median progression-free survival (mPFS) between 1.8 and 2.8 months, and a mOS between 4.1 and 6.2 months.

Failure to achieve adequate survival outcomes with standard treatment regimens in patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC has encouraged efforts to combine multiple targeted therapies: With 665 randomized patients, the BEACON CRC trial represents the largest trial and is currently the only phase III study in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC. After a safety lead in for dose confirmation of the triplet regimen, the phase III part was per-formed with a total of 665 patients, randomized 1:1:1 to either receive encorafenib plus binimetinib and cetuximab (triplet) or encorafenib plus cetuximab (doublet) or FOLFIRI / IRI plus cetuximab (control).

The BEACON CRC study met its primary endpoints Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Overall Survival (OS) comparing Encorafenib + Binimetinib + Cetuximab vs. Chemotherapy + Cetuximab (ORR: 26 vs. 2%, p\<0.001; OS: median 9.0 vs. 5.4 months, HR 0.52, p\<0.001). The BEACON CRC study was alpha-controlled also for the secondary endpoint comparing Encorafenib + Cetuximab vs. Chemotherapy + Cetuximab in terms of ORR and OS and showed a statistically significant advantage (ORR: 20 vs. 2%, p\<0.001; OS: median 8.4 vs. 5.4 months, HR 0.60, p\<0.001). In terms of safety, the overall frequency of adverse events grade 3/4 was 58% (En-corafenib + Binimetinib + Cetuximab) vs. 50% (Encorafenib + Cetuximab) vs. 61% (Chemotherapy + Cetuximab). Analysis of Quality of Life data resulted in a longer maintenance of Quality of Life in the Encorafenib + Binimetinib + Cetuximab arm and the Encorafenib + Cetuximab arm com-pared to Chemotherapy + Cetuximab. Between Encorafenib + Binimetinib + Cetuximab and Encorafenib + Cetuximab, no relevant differences were reported. With a longer Follow-Up (12.8 months) the updated OS data showed a median OS of 9.3 months in both the Encorafenib + Binimetinib + Cetuximab arm and the Encorafenib + Cetuximab arm compared to 5.9 months in the control arm. Updated ORR rates were 27% in the triplet arm (p\<0.0001 vs. control), 20% in the doublet arm (p\<0.0001 vs. control) and 2% in the control arm. The safety and tolerability were adequate, manage-able and consistent with the known profiles of BRAF-, MEK-, and EGFR-inhibitors. Regarding the triplet combination, the most common adverse events of any grade were diarrhea (triplet: 62%; control: 48%), dermatitis acneiform (triplet: 49%; control: 39%), nausea (triplet: 45%; control: 41%), and vomiting (triplet: 38%; control: 29%). Regarding the doublet combina-tion, the most common adverse events of any grade were nausea (34%), diarrhea (33%), fatigue (doublet 30%; triplet 33%; control 27%) and derma-titis acneiform (29%).

The most common updated grade ≥3 adverse events regarding the triplet combination were diarrhea (triplet: 11%; control: 10%), abdominal pain (triplet: 6%; control: 5%), nausea (triplet: 5%; control: 2%,vomiting (triplet: 5%; control: 3%) and intestinal obstruction (triplet 5%; control 3%). With the doublet regimen, the most common updated grade ≥3 adverse events were intestinal obstruction (doublet 5%), asthenia (doublet 4%; triplet 4%; control 5%), fatigue (doublet 4%; triplet 2%; control 5%), diarrhea (3%) and abdominal pain (3%).

Based on these data, it is expected that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) will approve encorafenib plus cetuximab for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic BRAFV600E-mutant CRC, who have received prior systemic therapy.

Data from pivotal clinical trials are usually based on a selected patient population in order to provide standardized results in the given indication. However, after marketing authorization usage in a broader patient popula-tion is to be expected. Therefore, BERINGCRC - designed as a prospective (allowing initial retrospective documentation), longitudinal, non-interventional study - will investigate the real-world effectiveness, quality of life, safety and tolerability of encorafenib and cetuximab in BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC patients, who have received prior systemic therapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Encorafenib

Observation of real-life treatment with encorafenib and cetuximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Cetuximab

Observation of real-life treatment with encorafenib and cetuximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Braftovi Erbitux

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Written informed consent of the patient with regard to the pseudonymized documentation of his/her data in the frame of this non-interventional study
* Legally capable patient ≥ 18 years of age (no upper limit)
* Metastatic colorectal carcinoma with BRAFV600E-mutation, pretreated with systemic therapy
* Decision was taken to treat the patient with the doublet therapy (encorafenib and cetuximab) in accordance with the current SmPC and by prescription; this decision was taken prior to and independent from the inclusion into the study;
* Treatment with the doublet therapy (encorafenib plus cetuximab) has been started ≤ 3 months prior to providing written informed consent for this study or is planned to be started in the near future.

Exclusion Criteria

* More than 2 prior systemic regimens in the metastatic setting (adjuvant systemic therapy with relapse ≤ 6 months will be counted as metastatic treatment line; maintenance treatment will not be counted as separate metastatic treatment line)
* Prior treatment with any RAF-inhibitor or MEK-inhibitor.
* Presence of any contraindication with regard to the doublet therapy (encorafenib plus cetuximab) as specified in the corresponding SmPCs
* Current or upcoming participation in an interventional clinical trial
* Current or upcoming systemic treatment of any other tumor than metastatic colorectal carcinoma
* Prisoners or persons who are compulsorily detained (involuntarily incarcerated).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

iOMEDICO AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Pierre Fabre Pharma AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Pierre Fabre Pharma Austria

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Pierre Fabre Pharma GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinic

Braunau am Inn, Upper Austria, Austria

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Linz, Upper Austria, Austria

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Feldkirch, Voralberg, Austria

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Offenburg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Medical Care Centre

Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Donauwörth, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

München, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Medical Car Centre

Aschaffenburg, Bayer, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Medical Care Centre

Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Celle, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Medical Care Centre

Goslar, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Medical Practice

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Leer, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Weißenfels, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Medical Practice

Wilhelmshaven, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Rostock, Melcklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Bottrop, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Moers, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Medical Care Centre

Mönchengladbach, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Medical Care Centre

Mülheim, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Medical Care Centre

Neuss, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Paderborn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Medical Care Centre

Porta Westfalica, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Stolberg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Troisdorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Wuppertal, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Bad Kreuznach, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Kaiserslautern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Worms, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Prctice

Naunhof, Saxony, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Torgau, Saxony, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Köthen, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Köthen, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Flensburg, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Eisenach, Thuringia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital

Aschaffenburg, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Medical Care Centre

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinic

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Private Practice

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Private Practice

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital

Esslingen am Neckar, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Practice

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Private Practice

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Private Practice

Leer, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Private Practice

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Private Practice

Naunhof, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Private Practice

Offenburg, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Private Practice

Oldenburg in Holstein, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Private Practice

Schorndorf, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Private Practice

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Marion Schmoll

Role: CONTACT

+4976115242627 ext. 0

Frank Reichenbach, Dr. rer. nat

Role: CONTACT

+4976145261846 ext. 0

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NIS-PFO-2020-3101

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cetuximab for Elderly Patients With mCRC
NCT01718808 TERMINATED PHASE2