A Study to Compare SB16 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar) to Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

NCT ID: NCT04664959

Last Updated: 2025-02-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

457 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-26

Study Completion Date

2023-01-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomised, double-blind, multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, PK, PD, and immunogenicity of SB16 compared to Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Subjects will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SB16 or Prolia®. At Month 12, subjects in Prolia® treatment group will be randomised again in a 1:1 ratio to either continue on Prolia® treatment or be transitioned to SB16 treatment. Investigational product (60 mg in 1 mL of SB16 or Prolia®) will be given subcutaneously every 6 months up to Month 12, and the last assessment will be done at Month 18.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SB16 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar)

Subjects randomised into SB16 group will receive SB16 (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously every 6 months.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SB16 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar)

Intervention Type DRUG

Subjects randomised into SB16 group will receive SB16 (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously every 6 months.

At Month 12, subjects transited from Prolia® group to SB16 group will receive SB16 (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously.

Prolia® (Denosumab)

Subjects randomised into Prolia® group will receive Prolia® (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously every 6 months.

At Month 12, subjects in Prolia® treatment group will be re-randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either continue on Prolia® treatment or be transitioned to SB16 treatment. After re-randomisation, subjects transited to SB16 group will receive SB16, and subjects remaining in Prolia® group will continue to receive Prolia® at Month 12.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SB16 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar)

Intervention Type DRUG

Subjects randomised into SB16 group will receive SB16 (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously every 6 months.

At Month 12, subjects transited from Prolia® group to SB16 group will receive SB16 (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously.

Prolia® (Denosumab)

Intervention Type DRUG

Subjects randomised into Prolia® group will receive Prolia® (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously every 6 months.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SB16 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar)

Subjects randomised into SB16 group will receive SB16 (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously every 6 months.

At Month 12, subjects transited from Prolia® group to SB16 group will receive SB16 (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously.

Intervention Type DRUG

Prolia® (Denosumab)

Subjects randomised into Prolia® group will receive Prolia® (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously every 6 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Postmenopausal women who are 55 to 80 years of age at Screening
* Ambulatory and visually unimpaired to participate in the study at Screening, in the opinion of the Investigator
* Absolute BMD consistent with T-score at the total hip or lumbar spine of -4 and -2.5 at Screening
* At least three evaluable vertebrae within L1 to L4, one evaluable femoral neck, and one evaluable hip joint for BMD measurement at Screening
* Biologic naïve at Screening
* Body weight of 50 kg and 90 kg at Screening

Exclusion Criteria

* One severe or more than two moderate vertebral fractures on spinal X-ray according to Genant classification at Screening
* History of hip fracture or bilateral hip replacement at Screening
* Uncorrected vitamin D deficiency at Screening
* Hypercalcemia or hypocalcaemia at Screening
* Inadequate haematological function at Screening
* Inadequate renal or hepatic function at Screening
* Known allergic reactions, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to denosumab or to any ingredients of the IP, including latex allergy or hereditary problems of fructose intolerance at Screening
* May not tolerate long-term calcium or vitamin D supplementation or subject with malabsorption of calcium or vitamin D supplements, in the opinion of the Investigator, at Screening
* Use of any of the medications that can affect BMD
* Use of any non-biologic IP that is not indicated for osteoporosis from another study or use of an investigational device at Screening
* Non-osteoporosis medical conditions that can affect BMD at Screening
* Any clinically significant disease or disorder or laboratory abnormality which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would prevent the subject from completing the study or the interpretation of the study results at Screening and Randomisation
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

SB Investigative Site

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

SB Investigative Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

SB Investigative Site

Siedlce, , Poland

Site Status

SB Investigative Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

SB Investigative Site

Zamość, , Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Langdahl B, Chung YS, Plebanski R, Czerwinski E, Dokoupilova E, Supronik J, Rosa J, Mydlak A, Rowinska-Osuch A, Baek KH, Urboniene A, Mordaka R, Ahn S, Rho YH, Ban J, Eastell R. Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar SB16 vs Reference Denosumab in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Phase 3 Results Up to Month 12. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 May 19;110(6):e1951-e1958. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae611.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39243386 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SB16-3001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparative Efficacy, Safety, PK, and Immunogenicity Study
NCT05853354 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE3