A Study to Compare SB16 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar) to Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
NCT ID: NCT04664959
Last Updated: 2025-02-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
457 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-11-26
2023-01-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity Study of SB16 in Healthy Male Subjects
NCT04621318
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Biosimilar Denosumab With Prolia®
NCT05405725
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Between CT-P41 and US-licensed Prolia in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
NCT04757376
Comparison of Efficacy, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
NCT05345691
A Double-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab Produced by Two Different Processes in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
NCT02157948
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SB16 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar)
Subjects randomised into SB16 group will receive SB16 (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously every 6 months.
SB16 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar)
Subjects randomised into SB16 group will receive SB16 (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously every 6 months.
At Month 12, subjects transited from Prolia® group to SB16 group will receive SB16 (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously.
Prolia® (Denosumab)
Subjects randomised into Prolia® group will receive Prolia® (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously every 6 months.
At Month 12, subjects in Prolia® treatment group will be re-randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either continue on Prolia® treatment or be transitioned to SB16 treatment. After re-randomisation, subjects transited to SB16 group will receive SB16, and subjects remaining in Prolia® group will continue to receive Prolia® at Month 12.
SB16 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar)
Subjects randomised into SB16 group will receive SB16 (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously every 6 months.
At Month 12, subjects transited from Prolia® group to SB16 group will receive SB16 (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously.
Prolia® (Denosumab)
Subjects randomised into Prolia® group will receive Prolia® (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously every 6 months.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SB16 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar)
Subjects randomised into SB16 group will receive SB16 (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously every 6 months.
At Month 12, subjects transited from Prolia® group to SB16 group will receive SB16 (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously.
Prolia® (Denosumab)
Subjects randomised into Prolia® group will receive Prolia® (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously every 6 months.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ambulatory and visually unimpaired to participate in the study at Screening, in the opinion of the Investigator
* Absolute BMD consistent with T-score at the total hip or lumbar spine of -4 and -2.5 at Screening
* At least three evaluable vertebrae within L1 to L4, one evaluable femoral neck, and one evaluable hip joint for BMD measurement at Screening
* Biologic naïve at Screening
* Body weight of 50 kg and 90 kg at Screening
Exclusion Criteria
* History of hip fracture or bilateral hip replacement at Screening
* Uncorrected vitamin D deficiency at Screening
* Hypercalcemia or hypocalcaemia at Screening
* Inadequate haematological function at Screening
* Inadequate renal or hepatic function at Screening
* Known allergic reactions, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to denosumab or to any ingredients of the IP, including latex allergy or hereditary problems of fructose intolerance at Screening
* May not tolerate long-term calcium or vitamin D supplementation or subject with malabsorption of calcium or vitamin D supplements, in the opinion of the Investigator, at Screening
* Use of any of the medications that can affect BMD
* Use of any non-biologic IP that is not indicated for osteoporosis from another study or use of an investigational device at Screening
* Non-osteoporosis medical conditions that can affect BMD at Screening
* Any clinically significant disease or disorder or laboratory abnormality which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would prevent the subject from completing the study or the interpretation of the study results at Screening and Randomisation
55 Years
80 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
SB Investigative Site
Krakow, , Poland
SB Investigative Site
Lodz, , Poland
SB Investigative Site
Siedlce, , Poland
SB Investigative Site
Warsaw, , Poland
SB Investigative Site
Zamość, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Langdahl B, Chung YS, Plebanski R, Czerwinski E, Dokoupilova E, Supronik J, Rosa J, Mydlak A, Rowinska-Osuch A, Baek KH, Urboniene A, Mordaka R, Ahn S, Rho YH, Ban J, Eastell R. Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar SB16 vs Reference Denosumab in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Phase 3 Results Up to Month 12. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 May 19;110(6):e1951-e1958. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae611.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SB16-3001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.