Hospitalization or Outpatient ManagEment of Patients With SRAS-CoV-2 Infection - Revised HOME-CoV Score Study

NCT ID: NCT04657471

Last Updated: 2021-03-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-12-08

Study Completion Date

2021-03-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In the context of COVID-19 pandemic, identifying low-risk patients who can be safely treated at home and high-risk patients requiring hospitalization or even intensive care is crucial for Emergency Departments. Thanks to a consensus of experts using the Delphi method, we previously defined the HOME-CoV rule. The HOME-CoV rule consists of 8 items precluding home treatment for patients consulting in the Emergency Department (ED) with confirmed or highly suspected mild to moderate COVID-19. It has been validated in a prospective study, patients with a negative rule having a very-low rate of invasive ventilation or death within the 7 days following ED presentation (HOME-CoV study, NCT: 02811237).

Using logistic regression, we revised the HOME-CoV rule in order to define a score allowing. The revised HOME-CoV score comprises 7 criteria and, retrospectively assessed in the database of the HOME-CoV study, it exhibits promising performances. A revised HOME-CoV score \< 2 had a sensitivity of 0.93 (0.84 to 0.98), a specificity of 0.60 (0.58 to 0.61) and negative predictive value of 1.00 (0.99 to 1.00); and a score \> 4 had a sensitivity of 0.41 (0.28 to 0.54), a specificity of 0.93 (0.92 to 0.94) and a positive predictive value of 0.11 (0.07 to 0.16).

The present study aims to prospectively validate the revised HOME-CoV score, firstly, in identifying a subgroup of COVID-19 patients with a low risk of evolution to severe COVID-19 and who could be safely treated at home.

For this purpose, we will perform an interventional multicentric prospective pragmatic cohort study with implementation of the revised HOME-CoV score to triage COVID-19 patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In all participating Emergency Departments, patients with highly suspected or confirmed COVID-19 are evaluated for potential inclusion. Clinical, biological, and imaging data that may be involved in decision-making about hospitalization, including all criteria of the revised HOME-CoV score, are collected. The revised HOME-CoV score is calculated. Patients with a score \<2 qualify for home treatment. They qualify otherwise for hospitalization. For patients with a score \> 4, hospitalization in a unit allowing monitoring of vital parameters is recommended. The qualification for home treatment or for hospitalization can be overruled by the physician-in-charge in case of major medical or social reasons. A justification explaining the cause of overruling is required.

A phone-call follow-up is performed on Day 7 and the patients' clinical status according to the Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement of COVID-19 from the World Health Organization (WHO-OSCI) is collected.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronavirus Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Multicentre prospective study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

revised HOMe-CoV

Revised HOME-CoV

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

revised HOME-CoV score

Intervention Type OTHER

Educational lectures, posters, and pocket cards showing and explaining the revised HOME-CoV score are communicated to participating Emergency Departments.

For included patients, the physician-in-charge calculates the revised HOME-CoV. Patients with a score \<2 qualified for home treatment. They qualified otherwise for hospitalization. For patients with a score \> 4, hospitalization in a unit allowing monitoring of vital parameters is recommended. However, the physician-in-charge can overrule the qualification for home treatment or for hospitalization in case of major medical or social reasons. A justification explaining the cause of overruling is required.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

revised HOME-CoV score

Educational lectures, posters, and pocket cards showing and explaining the revised HOME-CoV score are communicated to participating Emergency Departments.

For included patients, the physician-in-charge calculates the revised HOME-CoV. Patients with a score \<2 qualified for home treatment. They qualified otherwise for hospitalization. For patients with a score \> 4, hospitalization in a unit allowing monitoring of vital parameters is recommended. However, the physician-in-charge can overrule the qualification for home treatment or for hospitalization in case of major medical or social reasons. A justification explaining the cause of overruling is required.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patient (≥ 18 years old)
* Admitted for COVID-19 infection confirmed by a positive SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR or considered probable by the physician in charge of the patient.
* Not requiring care in intensive care unit or resuscitation unit or
* No subject of a limitation decision of active therapies,
* Free informed express consent to participate in the study orally given or signed by the patient according to local legislation,
* Insurance cover according to local legislation;

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient admitted to the emergency room for 18 hours or more,
* Patient whose follow-up on D7 is impossible, whatever the reason,
* Patient already included in the study,
* Person deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision,
* Person under psychiatric care under duress,
* Person subject to a legal protection measure,
* Person unable to express consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Angers

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medhi TAALBA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Rouen

David DALL'ACQUA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Jacques Lacarin Hospital Center

Anyhony CHAUVIN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

AP-HP Hopital Lariboisière

Emmanuel MONTASSIER

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nantes University Hospital

Christian BRICE

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CH St Brieuc

Frédéric BALEN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Toulouse

Kasarra BEN HAMMOUDA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CH Colmar

Marc NOIZET

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHRU Mulhouse

Romain BLONDET

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ch Mont de Marsan

Mustapha SEBBANE

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Montpellier

Pierre-Clément THIEBAUD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

AP-HP Hôpital St Antoine

Marc ANDRONIKOF

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

AP-HP Hôpital Béclère

Esma OUMMAMAR

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CH Le Mans

Laure ABENSUR VUILLAUME

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHRU Metz-Thionville

Henrinjatovo ANDRIANJAFY

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Groupe Hospitalier Nord Essonne - Longjumeau

Yann-Erick CLAESSENS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CH Princesse Grace de Monaco

Pascal BISSOLOKELE

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CH Libourne

Francis COUTURAUD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Brest

Séverine GOSSELIN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Dijon

Mathieu VIOLEAU

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CH Niort

SCHMIDT Jeannot

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Henri Hani KARAM

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Limoges

Meïssa KARE

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CH Agen

Coralie CAYEUX

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CH Remiremont

Florent FREMY

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

AP-HP HEGP

Nicolas PESCHANSKI

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Rennes

Caroline SOULIE

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CH Cholet

Ombeline SUSONG

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

GHT La Rochelle

Stéphane GENNAI

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU REIMS

Julie PERNET

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

AP-HP La Pitié-Salpêtrière

Andrea PENALOZA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cliniques Universitaires St Luc (Bruxelles)

Alexandre GHUYSEN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege

Sonja CURAC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hôpital Erasme (Bruxelles)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-A03067-32

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.