Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-11-05
2030-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This new way of medical imaging is being developed to help cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. Radiation therapy is used to treat cancerous tumors. For radiation therapy to be effective, the precise size, shape, and location of the tumor within the body must be known. A particular difficulty for radiation treatment of lung and liver cancer is that the tumor moves during treatment because the patient is breathing. Therefore, tumor motion must also be incorporated into the treatment plan. This study aims to improve radiation treatment planning through better targeting and dose estimation based on 4D-MRI. Before this new imaging method can be used for radiation treatment planning, it must be tested in living, breathing volunteers.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Motion
NCT02019199
Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI )for Early Response Assessment in Patients With Esophageal Cancer
NCT02527057
DCE-MRI for Assessment of Response to TACE of HCC
NCT02878109
Functional Imaging of Tumor and Normal Tissue
NCT00933114
4D Phase Contrast MR: Hypertrophy in Liver Cancer
NCT02618447
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The current standard of 4D imaging in radiotherapy is 4D-CT. However, it has two major limitations preventing it from precision radiotherapy applications: (a) low soft-tissue contrast. 4D-CT is therefore not ideal for abdominal applications; (b) motion artifacts caused by irregular breathing. 4D-CT motion artifacts have been shown to cause errors in various radiotherapy applications, including motion measurement, target volume delineation, dose calculation, DIR, and lung ventilation calculation. 4D-MRI is an emerging 4D imaging technology for radiotherapy. It has superior soft-tissue contrast to 4D-CT and is therefore superb for abdominal imaging. Despite many recent advances in 4D-MRI, current 4D-MRI implementations have inadequate image quality for precision radiotherapy application due to at least one of the following deficiencies: low temporal and/or spatial resolutions, long image acquisition time, and suboptimal contrast in the lungs. Resulting 4D-MRI images lack sufficient anatomical details for clinical applications, which can adversely affect the performance of DIR. Current DIR techniques focus on morphological similarity but not on the physiological plausibility of the deformation. Studies have shown that an increased morphological similarity of the aligned data does not always imply increased registration accuracy. Therefore, more sophisticated approaches are desirable.
The investigators will take a systematic approach to address the aforementioned limitations of 4D imaging and deformable image registration (DIR) based on the development and cross-fertilization of two major techniques: ultra-quality 4D-MRI and physiological-based hybrid DIR. There are two parts of this research, comprising three main objectives:
Part 1. Technical development in healthy subjects: The investigators will extend their existing pulse sequence strategy for ultra-quality 3D MRI to enable ultra-quality 4D-MRI. Compared to 4D-CT and current 4D-MRI techniques, the proposed ultra-quality 4D-MRI technique offers the following advantages: (a) high spatial resolution (1.5 mm isotropic) with rich image features (e.g. vessel trees) in the whole torso; (b) high temporal pseudo-resolution (\>20 phases/cycle); and (c) (nearly) free of motion artifacts.
• Objective 1: Develop an MRI pulse sequence and image reconstruction pipeline that generates images meeting these three design goals.
Part 2. Evaluation of 4D-MRI in a patient study: 4D-MRI will be compared with existing DIR and 4D-CT methods. There will be two classes of comparisons, each formulated as a separate objective:
* Objective 2: Compare motion modelling based on 4D-MRI with deformable image registration (DIR) in healthy volunteers and cancer patients. An improved motion modeling method will be developed that is tailored for the ultra-quality 4D-MRI applications. The investigators hypothesize that a new motion modeling method based on 4D-MRI will outperform current DIR algorithms for respiratory motion estimation. This hypothesis will be tested by comparing the new method to five DIR algorithms which include a mix of commercial software and publicly available algorithms.
* Objective 3: Compare 4D-MRI with 4D-CT in lung and liver cancer patients. The overall hypothesis of this objective is that the ultra-quality 4D-MRI provides better image quality than 4D-CT for motion management of radiotherapy in the lungs and the liver, especially in patients with irregular breathing.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Healthy
Healthy volunteers from the local community
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Four-dimensional MRI of torso
Liver cancer
Patients undergoing radiotherapy for liver cancer
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Four-dimensional MRI of torso
Lung cancer
Patients undergoing radiotherapy for lung cancer
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Four-dimensional MRI of torso
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Four-dimensional MRI of torso
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient has primary or metastatic tumor(s) in the lungs or the liver
* Diameter of the tumor(s) is less than 7 cm
* Patient will receive radiation therapy (ordered by the treating Radiation Oncologist) as part of their treatment regimen
* Patient will undergo a planning CT scan with tumor motion assessment (planning 4D-CT ordered by the treating Radiation Oncologist) as part of their treatment regimen
* Patient has signed informed consent and is willing to comply with the 4D-MRI imaging protocol
* Subject is 18 or older
* Subject has signed informed consent and is willing to comply with the 4D-MRI imaging protocol
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects who have difficulty lying flat on their back for extended periods of time
* Patients with any serious/poorly controlled medical or psychological conditions that would complicate protocol compliance
* Too large to adequately fit in the magnet bore or RF coils
* Claustrophobia
* Females who are pregnant or lactating
* Presence of active or chronic infection
18 Years
82 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duke University
OTHER
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
OTHER
University of Virginia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
G. Wilson Miller, MD
Associate Professor of Radiology and Medical Imaging
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
G. Wilson Miller, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Univsersity of Virginia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15547
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.