Evaluation of Tricuspid Valve Percutaneous Repair System in the Treatment of Severe Secondary Tricuspid Disorders

NCT ID: NCT04646811

Last Updated: 2024-06-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-10

Study Completion Date

2024-04-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a long-overdue valvular pathology. Its prevalence is significant and increasing with the aging of the population. It is often a consequence of chronic left cardiac pathologies or atrial fibrillation. Surgical treatment is recommended in severe symptomatic TR or when the tricuspid annulus is dilated with TR identified prior to scheduled left heart valve surgery. TR are mainly secondary (complicating left heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation and atrial dilatation) and pose a difficult problem related to the prognosis. The risk of death or hospitalization is high under medical treatment. Nevertheless, the surgical results are disappointing with significant morbidity and mortality, which are increased by associated comorbidities that are frequent in these sorts of patients. The benefit-risk assessment of surgery is limited by multiple confounders.

This justifies the evaluation of alternative methods aimed at correcting TR with less interventional risk.

The Clip for the tricuspid valve has been evaluated in the TRILUMINATE trial (inclusion of 85 patients with moderate-to-severe symptomatic TR with a 6-month follow-up). The Triclip system appears to be safe and effective at reducing tricuspid regurgitation by at least one grade. This reduction could translate to significant clinical improvement at 6 months post-procedure. It justified the European Conformity (CE) mark obtention.

A very similar system for the mitral valve (Mitraclip) was previously tested in the randomized EVEREST II study against conventional surgery. The results of the EVEREST II trial justified the recourse to percutaneous edge-to edge mitral repair in patients with primary mitral regurgitation when the patient is contraindicated to conventional surgery.

The Mitra-FR study made it possible to study the role of Mitraclip for treating patient suffering from a secondary mitral insufficiency. It leads to the implementation of this technique in selected patients.

For secondary TR, several series underscored its prevalence and its clinical consequences. TR treatment justifies the proposal for a randomized study. As a matter of fact, evidence for treating are seriously lacking. Surgical surveys report hospital mortality \~ 8.8%. It, therefore, seems necessary to conduct a study as robust as possible to evaluate the contribution of clip for the tricuspid valve (as an innovative percutaneous technique) compared to conventional pharmacological treatment in patients who are unsuitable for a surgical isolated correction of the TR and who has suitable anatomy for clip for the tricuspid valve. It will be necessary to demonstrate clinical, functional (quality of life), echocardiographic and biological benefit of the percutaneous treatment vs optimized medical treatment alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The principal objective is to demonstrate, over a period of 12-month after randomization, that, on the Packer composite clinical endpoint (CCS) (combining NYHA class, patient global assessment (PGA) and major cardio-vascular events), the tricuspid valve percutaneous repair strategy with clip for the tricuspid valve is superior to best (optimized) medical treatment (BMT) in symptomatic patients with at least severe secondary TR. The Packer clinical composite score is eventually a three-level ordered categorical endpoint, each randomized patient being classifying as improved, unchanged, or worsen, depending on the clinical response over the follow-up period and at 12 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tricuspid Regurgitation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tricuspid valve

tricuspid valve percutaneous repair strategy with clip for the tricuspid valve

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tricuspid valve

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Clip for the tricuspid valve implantation on top of best medical therapy

Best medical treatment

Group Type OTHER

Best medical treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Best medical therapy alone

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tricuspid valve

Clip for the tricuspid valve implantation on top of best medical therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Best medical treatment

Best medical therapy alone

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years
2. Symptomatic secondary (at least) severe TR (Carpentier Type IIIB (restrictive) and / or I (tricuspid annulus dilation)) stable for at least 30 days
3. NYHA functional class II to IV without cirrhosis and/or ascites
4. Signs of heart failure in the previous 12-months with or without having been hospitalized
5. Stable optimized medical and/or interventional treatment
6. Ineligible for corrective action on the valve by surgical approach after a specialized multidisciplinary consultation ("heart team") including at least a cardio-thoracic surgeon, an interventional cardiologist, an imaging-cardiologist and an Anesthesiologist).
7. Signature of an informed consent

8. Central core-laboratory analysis : TR characterized before Implantation by at least one of the following criteria:

* Regurgitation volume \> 45 mL / beat
* Surface of the regurgitant orifice \> 40 mm²
* Vena contracta\> 7mm
* Gap between leaflets ≤ 10 mm (at the presumed location of the clip)

Then after the TR severity grading; the Clinical eligibility Committee will valid the inclusion.


1. Patient treated with Mitraclip or other percutaneous approach on the mitral valve in the past 3-month
2. Any prior tricuspid valve procedure that would interfere with placement of the Triclip device
3. Tricuspid valve leaflet anatomy which may preclude clip implantation, proper clip positioning on the leaflets or sufficient reduction in TR. This may include:

* Tricuspid valve anatomy not evaluable by TTE and TEE
* Active endocarditis
* Evidence of calcification in the grasping area
* Evidence of stenosis (mean pressure gradient \> 5 mmHg or surface area ≤1cm²
* Presence of a severe coaptation defect (\> 1cm) of the tricuspid leaflets
* Severe leaflet defect(s) preventing proper device placement
* Epstein anomaly - identified by having a normal annulus position while the valve leaflets are attached to the walls and septum of the right ventricle
4. Myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery in the past 3-month
5. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%
6. Cardiac Resynchronization therapy for less than 3-month and patients having a TR that is clearly related to the right ventricular lead positioning
7. Cardioversion for less than 6 weeks
8. Life expectancy irrespective of the valvular heart disease \<1 year (due to co-morbidities)
9. Other scheduled cardiac surgery (including registration in cardiac transplant list)
10. Coronary angioplasty in the preceding month
11. Current infection requiring prescription of antibiotics
12. End-stage renal failure (dialysis patient)
13. Severe hepatic insufficiency (disruption of liver metabolism associated with coagulation disorders (factor V \<50%))
14. Stroke in the previous 3-month
15. Uncontrolled pre- capillary pulmonary hypertension (right catheterization required) (systolic pulmonary pressure \> 60 mmHg)
16. Tricuspid prosthetic valve
17. Pace maker lead or ICD lead that would prevent appropriate placement of the Triclips
18. Nitinol allergy
19. Contraindication, allergy or hypersensibility to dual anti-platelet and anticoagulant therapy
20. Ongoing infection requiring antibiotic therapy
21. Evidence of intra vascular or intra cardiac thrombus
22. Patient who are included in another research protocol
23. Protected person (adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship or supervision), person deprived of their liberty, pregnant woman, lactating woman and minor)
24. Absence of coverage by a social security scheme
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rennes University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Donal Erwan

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Rennes

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Service de Cardiologie AZ Sint-Jan

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

CHU Liège

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

CHU Amiens

Amiens, , France

Site Status

CHU Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

CHU Bordeaux - Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue

Le Plessis-Robinson, , France

Site Status

CHU Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Privé Le Bois

Lille, , France

Site Status

Hospices Civils de Lyon Groupement Hospitalier EST

Lyon, , France

Site Status

APHM - Hôpital La Timone

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Hôpital de Saint-Joseph

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud Hôpital Jacques Cartier

Massy, , France

Site Status

Clinique du Millénaire

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

CHU Nantes - Hôtel Dieu et Hôpital Nord Laennec

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Bichat

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou

Paris, , France

Site Status

Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Centre Cardiologique du Nord

Saint-Denis, , France

Site Status

CHU La Réunion

Saint-Denis, , France

Site Status

CHU Saint-Etienne

Saint-Etienne, , France

Site Status

CHU Toulouse - Hôpital Rangueil

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Clinique Pasteur

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

CHU Tours - Hôpital Trousseau

Tours, , France

Site Status

Médipôle Lyon-Villeurbanne

Villeurbanne, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Donal E, Dreyfus J, Leurent G, Coisne A, Leroux PY, Ganivet A, Sportouch C, Lavie-Badie Y, Guerin P, Rouleau F, Diakov C, van der Heyden J, Lafitte S, Obadia JF, Nejjari M, Karam N, Bernard A, Neylon A, Pierrard R, Tchetche D, Ghostine S, Ducrocq G, Si Moussi T, Jeu A, Peltier M, Cosyns B, Le Dolley Y, Habib G, Auffret V, Le Ven F, Picard F, Piriou N, Laperche T, Galli E, Istratoaie S, Jouan J, Bonnet G, de Groote P, Anselmi A, Trochu JN, Oger E; Tri-Fr Investigators. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Severe Isolated Tricuspid Regurgitation: The Tri.Fr Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Jan 14;333(2):124-132. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.21189.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39602173 (View on PubMed)

Donal E, Leurent G, Iung B. Are We Right to Believe in the Value of Transcatheter Treatment of Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jan 26;77(3):240-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.037. No abstract available.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33478647 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-A00645-34

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

35RC18_8851_TRI-FR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.