Evaluation of Tricuspid Valve Percutaneous Repair System in the Treatment of Severe Secondary Tricuspid Disorders
NCT ID: NCT04646811
Last Updated: 2024-06-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-02-10
2024-04-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This justifies the evaluation of alternative methods aimed at correcting TR with less interventional risk.
The Clip for the tricuspid valve has been evaluated in the TRILUMINATE trial (inclusion of 85 patients with moderate-to-severe symptomatic TR with a 6-month follow-up). The Triclip system appears to be safe and effective at reducing tricuspid regurgitation by at least one grade. This reduction could translate to significant clinical improvement at 6 months post-procedure. It justified the European Conformity (CE) mark obtention.
A very similar system for the mitral valve (Mitraclip) was previously tested in the randomized EVEREST II study against conventional surgery. The results of the EVEREST II trial justified the recourse to percutaneous edge-to edge mitral repair in patients with primary mitral regurgitation when the patient is contraindicated to conventional surgery.
The Mitra-FR study made it possible to study the role of Mitraclip for treating patient suffering from a secondary mitral insufficiency. It leads to the implementation of this technique in selected patients.
For secondary TR, several series underscored its prevalence and its clinical consequences. TR treatment justifies the proposal for a randomized study. As a matter of fact, evidence for treating are seriously lacking. Surgical surveys report hospital mortality \~ 8.8%. It, therefore, seems necessary to conduct a study as robust as possible to evaluate the contribution of clip for the tricuspid valve (as an innovative percutaneous technique) compared to conventional pharmacological treatment in patients who are unsuitable for a surgical isolated correction of the TR and who has suitable anatomy for clip for the tricuspid valve. It will be necessary to demonstrate clinical, functional (quality of life), echocardiographic and biological benefit of the percutaneous treatment vs optimized medical treatment alone.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
TRI-REPAIR: TrIcuspid Regurgitation RePAIr With CaRdioband Transcatheter System
NCT02981953
Outcome of Patients with Severe Functional TR According to Medical, Transcatheter or Surgical Treatment
NCT05825898
German Registry for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions
NCT04653428
Effectiveness and Durability Long-term Results of Tricuspid Annuloplasty With 3D Shaped Rings.
NCT05836415
The TRICURE EU Pivotal Study
NCT06581471
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tricuspid valve
tricuspid valve percutaneous repair strategy with clip for the tricuspid valve
Tricuspid valve
Clip for the tricuspid valve implantation on top of best medical therapy
Best medical treatment
Best medical treatment
Best medical therapy alone
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tricuspid valve
Clip for the tricuspid valve implantation on top of best medical therapy
Best medical treatment
Best medical therapy alone
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Symptomatic secondary (at least) severe TR (Carpentier Type IIIB (restrictive) and / or I (tricuspid annulus dilation)) stable for at least 30 days
3. NYHA functional class II to IV without cirrhosis and/or ascites
4. Signs of heart failure in the previous 12-months with or without having been hospitalized
5. Stable optimized medical and/or interventional treatment
6. Ineligible for corrective action on the valve by surgical approach after a specialized multidisciplinary consultation ("heart team") including at least a cardio-thoracic surgeon, an interventional cardiologist, an imaging-cardiologist and an Anesthesiologist).
7. Signature of an informed consent
8. Central core-laboratory analysis : TR characterized before Implantation by at least one of the following criteria:
* Regurgitation volume \> 45 mL / beat
* Surface of the regurgitant orifice \> 40 mm²
* Vena contracta\> 7mm
* Gap between leaflets ≤ 10 mm (at the presumed location of the clip)
Then after the TR severity grading; the Clinical eligibility Committee will valid the inclusion.
1. Patient treated with Mitraclip or other percutaneous approach on the mitral valve in the past 3-month
2. Any prior tricuspid valve procedure that would interfere with placement of the Triclip device
3. Tricuspid valve leaflet anatomy which may preclude clip implantation, proper clip positioning on the leaflets or sufficient reduction in TR. This may include:
* Tricuspid valve anatomy not evaluable by TTE and TEE
* Active endocarditis
* Evidence of calcification in the grasping area
* Evidence of stenosis (mean pressure gradient \> 5 mmHg or surface area ≤1cm²
* Presence of a severe coaptation defect (\> 1cm) of the tricuspid leaflets
* Severe leaflet defect(s) preventing proper device placement
* Epstein anomaly - identified by having a normal annulus position while the valve leaflets are attached to the walls and septum of the right ventricle
4. Myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery in the past 3-month
5. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%
6. Cardiac Resynchronization therapy for less than 3-month and patients having a TR that is clearly related to the right ventricular lead positioning
7. Cardioversion for less than 6 weeks
8. Life expectancy irrespective of the valvular heart disease \<1 year (due to co-morbidities)
9. Other scheduled cardiac surgery (including registration in cardiac transplant list)
10. Coronary angioplasty in the preceding month
11. Current infection requiring prescription of antibiotics
12. End-stage renal failure (dialysis patient)
13. Severe hepatic insufficiency (disruption of liver metabolism associated with coagulation disorders (factor V \<50%))
14. Stroke in the previous 3-month
15. Uncontrolled pre- capillary pulmonary hypertension (right catheterization required) (systolic pulmonary pressure \> 60 mmHg)
16. Tricuspid prosthetic valve
17. Pace maker lead or ICD lead that would prevent appropriate placement of the Triclips
18. Nitinol allergy
19. Contraindication, allergy or hypersensibility to dual anti-platelet and anticoagulant therapy
20. Ongoing infection requiring antibiotic therapy
21. Evidence of intra vascular or intra cardiac thrombus
22. Patient who are included in another research protocol
23. Protected person (adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship or supervision), person deprived of their liberty, pregnant woman, lactating woman and minor)
24. Absence of coverage by a social security scheme
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rennes University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Donal Erwan
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU Rennes
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Service de Cardiologie AZ Sint-Jan
Bruges, , Belgium
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Brussels, , Belgium
CHU Liège
Liège, , Belgium
CHU Amiens
Amiens, , France
CHU Angers
Angers, , France
CHU Bordeaux - Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque
Bordeaux, , France
Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue
Le Plessis-Robinson, , France
CHU Lille
Lille, , France
Hôpital Privé Le Bois
Lille, , France
Hospices Civils de Lyon Groupement Hospitalier EST
Lyon, , France
APHM - Hôpital La Timone
Marseille, , France
Hôpital de Saint-Joseph
Marseille, , France
Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud Hôpital Jacques Cartier
Massy, , France
Clinique du Millénaire
Montpellier, , France
CHU Nantes - Hôtel Dieu et Hôpital Nord Laennec
Nantes, , France
Hôpital Bichat
Paris, , France
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
Paris, , France
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Paris, , France
CHU Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou
Rennes, , France
Centre Cardiologique du Nord
Saint-Denis, , France
CHU La Réunion
Saint-Denis, , France
CHU Saint-Etienne
Saint-Etienne, , France
CHU Toulouse - Hôpital Rangueil
Toulouse, , France
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse, , France
CHU Tours - Hôpital Trousseau
Tours, , France
Médipôle Lyon-Villeurbanne
Villeurbanne, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Donal E, Dreyfus J, Leurent G, Coisne A, Leroux PY, Ganivet A, Sportouch C, Lavie-Badie Y, Guerin P, Rouleau F, Diakov C, van der Heyden J, Lafitte S, Obadia JF, Nejjari M, Karam N, Bernard A, Neylon A, Pierrard R, Tchetche D, Ghostine S, Ducrocq G, Si Moussi T, Jeu A, Peltier M, Cosyns B, Le Dolley Y, Habib G, Auffret V, Le Ven F, Picard F, Piriou N, Laperche T, Galli E, Istratoaie S, Jouan J, Bonnet G, de Groote P, Anselmi A, Trochu JN, Oger E; Tri-Fr Investigators. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Severe Isolated Tricuspid Regurgitation: The Tri.Fr Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Jan 14;333(2):124-132. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.21189.
Donal E, Leurent G, Iung B. Are We Right to Believe in the Value of Transcatheter Treatment of Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jan 26;77(3):240-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.037. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020-A00645-34
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
35RC18_8851_TRI-FR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.