A Follow-On Study of Donanemab (LY3002813) With Video Assessments in Participants With Alzheimer's Disease (TRAILBLAZER-EXT)

NCT ID: NCT04640077

Last Updated: 2025-06-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

95 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-23

Study Completion Date

2024-02-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main goals of this study are to further determine whether the study drug donanemab is safe and effective in participants with Alzheimer's disease and to validate neuropsychological assessments administered over videoconferencing

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Alzheimer Disease Dementia Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Cognitive Impairment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Part A: Validation of Remote Scale Assessments

Participants from the originating trials did not receive any drug in Part A. Participants were randomized 1:1 into two groups to have their cognitive and functional scales assessed.

Group 1: Cognitive/functional scale assessment at the study site (on-site), followed by an at-home assessment (VTC; video teleconference), or Group 2: Cognitive/functional scale assessment at home (VTC), followed by assessment on-site.

Total time in Part A was up to 24 weeks.

Group Type OTHER

No Intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

No intervention

Part B: Donanemab

Participants who had received placebo in the originating trials received 700 milligrams (mg) donanemab administered intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 3 doses, then 1400 mg donanemab administered IV Q4W for up to 48 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

donanemab

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered IV

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

No Intervention

No intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

donanemab

Administered IV

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

LY3002813

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participated in a double-blind treatment period of a sponsor-approved originating donanemab trial, for example the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ study.
* Have a study partner
* Stable symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease (AD) medications and other medication that may impact cognition for at least 30 days prior to randomization into Part A

Exclusion Criteria

* Current serious or unstable illnesses including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, gastroenterologic, respiratory, endocrinologic, neurologic (other than AD), psychiatric, immunologic, or hematologic disease and other conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with outcome assessments or the analyses in this study.
* Have received treatment with a passive anti-amyloid immunotherapy after completion of originating donanemab study or received active immunization against Aβ in any other study.
* Poor venous access
* Contraindication to PET or MRI imaging
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eli Lilly and Company

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST)

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Eli Lilly and Company

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Banner Alzheimer's Institute

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

UC Irvine-Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders (UCI MIND)

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

Bradenton Research Center, Inc.

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Merritt Island Medical Research, LLC

Merritt Island, Florida, United States

Site Status

Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc.

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Advanced Research Consultants

Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, United States

Site Status

Progressive Medical Research

Port Orange, Florida, United States

Site Status

Intercoastal Medical Group - Hyde Park

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Stedman Clinical Trials

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Josephson Wallack Munshower Neurology, PC

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

The University of Kansas - Clinical Research Center

Fairway, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Cotton O'Neil Clinical Research Center - Central Office

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Boston Center for Memory

Newton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas Medical Research

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Advanced Memory Research Institute of New Jersey

Toms River, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Guilford Neurologic Research, PA

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Neurology Diagnostics, Inc.

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Abington Neurological Associates, Ltd.

Abington, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

National Clinical Research, Inc

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Bruyère Research Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto Memory Program

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Clinique de la Mémoire de l'Outaouais

Gatineau, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Diex Recherche Sherbrooke Inc.

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://trials.lillytrialguide.com/en-US/trial/7tATxSc3LHXNDE2nVmdIY

A Follow-On Study of Donanemab (LY3002813) With Video Assessments in Participants With Alzheimer's Disease (TRAILBLAZER-EXT)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

I5T-MC-AACH

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

17447

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.