Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
600 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-01-01
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improving Uptake of Antenatal Care Services in Rural Côte d'Ivoire
NCT07341581
Better Research Interactions for Every Family
NCT04152603
Comparing Two Models of Well-Child Care for Black Families
NCT05852392
Multi-Sectoral Agricultural Intervention to Improve Nutrition, Health, and Developmental Outcomes of HIV-infected and Affected Children in Western Kenya
NCT03170986
Cash Transfers to Address Child Welfare Involvement
NCT05857553
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Each quarter, facilities receive a supervision visit. During the supervision visits, one provider is randomly chosen for the knowledge assessments, and is tested on two randomly chosen vignette cases.
In order to create a quarterly performance score, the scores on the two vignettes are then averaged. Fifty percent of the overall facility quality score is determined by the general quality checklist that captures basic structural and process features of the facility. The remaining fifty percent are directly determined by the providers' performance on the knowledge assessments. If the overall quality score is below 50%, no quality payments are made. If the quality score is \>=50%, facilities can receive a top-up payment of up to 25% of the quantity-based payments. The total bonus percentage is determined by multiplying the quality score (with ranges between 0 and 100%) with the maximum 25% bonus.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control arm
Providers in control facilities will not receive any additional training or knowledge assessments.
No interventions assigned to this group
Financial incentive arm
Providers in treatment facilities will be visited once a quarter for a knowledge assessment using vignettes. Facilities performing well in this assessment will receive a quarterly bonus payment, which will be distributed among providers.
Financially incentivized knowledge assessments
We will conduct quarterly provider knowledge assessments at selected health facilities and will pay facilities a financial bonus if providers perform well on these tests. For the intervention, 12 clinical vignettes were created. These vignettes cover typical patient cases such as malaria, diarrhea and respiratory infections, and assess providers' ability to correctly diagnose and treat hypothetical questions. All medical staff members will be informed hat every 3 month there will be a knowledge assessment based on these vignettes and that the results will determine the total bonus payment made to the facility.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Financially incentivized knowledge assessments
We will conduct quarterly provider knowledge assessments at selected health facilities and will pay facilities a financial bonus if providers perform well on these tests. For the intervention, 12 clinical vignettes were created. These vignettes cover typical patient cases such as malaria, diarrhea and respiratory infections, and assess providers' ability to correctly diagnose and treat hypothetical questions. All medical staff members will be informed hat every 3 month there will be a knowledge assessment based on these vignettes and that the results will determine the total bonus payment made to the facility.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
World Bank
OTHER
Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gil Shapira, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
World Bank
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Congo Ministry of Public Health
Kinshasa, , Democratic Republic of the Congo
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
Basel, Canton of Basel-City, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fink G, Fritsche G, Samaha H, Sese C, Shapira G. Financially incentivized knowledge assessments to improve provider compliance with treatment guidelines: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2022 Mar 21;23(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06129-8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IncentLearn
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.