Financially-Incentives to Improve Provider Compliance

NCT ID: NCT04634019

Last Updated: 2025-05-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of this study is to assess whether making health financing streams conditional on provider performance on knowledge assessment can increase provider compliance with under-5 case management guidelines.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The main idea of the intervention is to conduct quarterly provider knowledge assessments at health facilities and to pay facilities a bonus if providers perform well on these tests. For the intervention, 12 clinical vignettes were created. These vignettes cover typical patient cases such as malaria, diarrhea and respiratory infections, and assess providers' ability to correctly diagnose and treat hypothetical questions. All medical staff members were informed hat every 3 month there would be a knowledge assessment based on these vignettes and that the results would determine the total bonus payment made to the facility.

Each quarter, facilities receive a supervision visit. During the supervision visits, one provider is randomly chosen for the knowledge assessments, and is tested on two randomly chosen vignette cases.

In order to create a quarterly performance score, the scores on the two vignettes are then averaged. Fifty percent of the overall facility quality score is determined by the general quality checklist that captures basic structural and process features of the facility. The remaining fifty percent are directly determined by the providers' performance on the knowledge assessments. If the overall quality score is below 50%, no quality payments are made. If the quality score is \>=50%, facilities can receive a top-up payment of up to 25% of the quantity-based payments. The total bonus percentage is determined by multiplying the quality score (with ranges between 0 and 100%) with the maximum 25% bonus.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Compliant Behavior Morbidity;Infant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This will be a two-arm parallel trial - control vs intervention.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control arm

Providers in control facilities will not receive any additional training or knowledge assessments.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Financial incentive arm

Providers in treatment facilities will be visited once a quarter for a knowledge assessment using vignettes. Facilities performing well in this assessment will receive a quarterly bonus payment, which will be distributed among providers.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Financially incentivized knowledge assessments

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

We will conduct quarterly provider knowledge assessments at selected health facilities and will pay facilities a financial bonus if providers perform well on these tests. For the intervention, 12 clinical vignettes were created. These vignettes cover typical patient cases such as malaria, diarrhea and respiratory infections, and assess providers' ability to correctly diagnose and treat hypothetical questions. All medical staff members will be informed hat every 3 month there will be a knowledge assessment based on these vignettes and that the results will determine the total bonus payment made to the facility.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Financially incentivized knowledge assessments

We will conduct quarterly provider knowledge assessments at selected health facilities and will pay facilities a financial bonus if providers perform well on these tests. For the intervention, 12 clinical vignettes were created. These vignettes cover typical patient cases such as malaria, diarrhea and respiratory infections, and assess providers' ability to correctly diagnose and treat hypothetical questions. All medical staff members will be informed hat every 3 month there will be a knowledge assessment based on these vignettes and that the results will determine the total bonus payment made to the facility.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Provider knowledge assessments

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all providers working at the 110 facilities selected for the study will be included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* none.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

World Bank

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gil Shapira, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

World Bank

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Congo Ministry of Public Health

Kinshasa, , Democratic Republic of the Congo

Site Status

Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute

Basel, Canton of Basel-City, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Democratic Republic of the Congo Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fink G, Fritsche G, Samaha H, Sese C, Shapira G. Financially incentivized knowledge assessments to improve provider compliance with treatment guidelines: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2022 Mar 21;23(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06129-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35313932 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IncentLearn

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.