EUS Guided Portal-systemic Pressure Gradient Measurement
NCT ID: NCT04633356
Last Updated: 2023-02-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE1/PHASE2
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-11-12
2024-11-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Albeit its clinical significance, direct measurement of portal venous pressure to document portal hypertension has traditionally been difficult. The portal vein pressure can be measured by transhepatic or transvenous methods but the procedure carries a risk of intra-peritoneal bleeding. Furthermore, the IVC pressure measurement requires further transjugular catheterisation. Hence, the technique is rarely used. Currently, the gold standard in measurement of portal hypertension is via measurement hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). The HVPG has been shown to correlate with risk of clinical decompensation, development of varices, hepatocellular carcinoma, variceal bleeding, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and mortality. Nevertheless, the technique has a low acceptance rate amongst patients and it may not be available even in tertiary medical centres.
Recently, the use of EUS-guided approach for measurement of portal pressure gradient (PPGM) has been shown to be feasible. The technical success rate was 100% and no adverse events were reported. Measurements obtained with the EUS approach was shown to correlate excellently with clinical parameters of portal hypertension including presence of varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy and thrombocytopenia. Furthermore, the procedure could be performed at the same time of screening oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD), that is frequently required for variceal screening in this group of patients. Hence, the aim of the current study is to investigate the feasibility of EUS-PPGM and correlate the risk of developing complications with the PPGM in patients that are suffering from chronic hepatitis.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
EUS Guided Portal-systemic Pressure Gradient Measurement to Predict Treatment Response and Outcomes of Varices to Endoscopic Variceal Ligation in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis.
NCT05597488
EUS-PPG vs HVPG in Portal Hypertension
NCT05689268
EUS-guided Portal Pressure Gradient (PPG) Measurement: a Potential Alternative to the Traditional HVPG
NCT06863012
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Portosystemic Pressure Gradient Measurements
NCT04668664
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Measurement of Portal Vein Pressure Gradient
NCT07062289
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of the current study is to investigate the feasibility of EUS-PPGM using the novel device and correlate the risk of developing complications with the PPGM in patients that are suffering from chronic hepatitis.
Recently, the use of EUS-guided approach for measurement of portal pressure gradient (PPGM) has been shown to be feasible. PPGM by the EUS approach was found to have excellent accuracy and strong correlation with pressure values obtained by the criterion standard transjugular wedged and free hepatic venous pressure measurements by interventional radiology in an animal model. Furthermore, in a pilot study involving 29 patients. The technical success rate was 100% and no adverse events were reported. Measurements obtained with the EUS approach was shown to correlate excellently with clinical parameters of portal hypertension including presence of varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy and thrombocytopenia. Furthermore, the procedure could be performed at the same time of screening oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD), that is frequently required for variceal screening in this group of patients. However, whether the technique could reproduce results similar to HVPG in humans is uncertain.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EUS-portal pressure gradient measurement (PPGM)
All patients would receive measurement of PPGM using the study device
EUS-portal pressure gradient measurement (PPGM)
EUS-guided PPGM is performed under conscious sedation. An OGD would be performed to evaluate for findings consistent with portal hypertension such as varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy. The linear array echoendoscope is passed from the mouth into the stomach and duodenum, as with a standard exam. Under endoscopic ultrasound guidance, a 25 gauge EUS needle (Echotip, Cook Medical, USA) primed with heparin 100 USP/ml is then placed across the stomach or duodenal wall and through the liver parenchyma into the portal vein. A pressure measurement is then obtained from the compact pressure transducer attached to the handle of the needle. Three separate measurements are made with re-priming of heparin (less than 0.5 ml). The process is repeated for the hepatic vein. The EUS - PPG is calculated by subtracting the average of the three hepatic vein pressure measurements from the average of the 3 direct portal vein pressure measurements.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EUS-portal pressure gradient measurement (PPGM)
EUS-guided PPGM is performed under conscious sedation. An OGD would be performed to evaluate for findings consistent with portal hypertension such as varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy. The linear array echoendoscope is passed from the mouth into the stomach and duodenum, as with a standard exam. Under endoscopic ultrasound guidance, a 25 gauge EUS needle (Echotip, Cook Medical, USA) primed with heparin 100 USP/ml is then placed across the stomach or duodenal wall and through the liver parenchyma into the portal vein. A pressure measurement is then obtained from the compact pressure transducer attached to the handle of the needle. Three separate measurements are made with re-priming of heparin (less than 0.5 ml). The process is repeated for the hepatic vein. The EUS - PPG is calculated by subtracting the average of the three hepatic vein pressure measurements from the average of the 3 direct portal vein pressure measurements.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Informed consent available
Exclusion Criteria
* Child-Pugh Class C
* Uncorrected platelet count \<50,000
* INR \> 1.5 (natural)
* Anatomical
* Previous transjugular intrahepatic or surgical portosystemic shunt
* Portal vein thrombosis
* Anatomic alterations of the hepatic vasculature that prevent access to the portal vein or intrahepatic portion of the hepatic veins (identified at screening and/or during the endoscopic procedure).
* Previous history of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis within the previous three months
* Portopulmonary hypertension
* Cardiac decompensation
* Evidence of active GI bleeding (identified at screening and/or during the endoscopic procedure)
* If the volume of ascites in the path of the needle prevents apposition of the gastrointestinal tract and liver.
* Presence of gastric or duodenal ulcers, dieulafoy's lesion or cancers.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anthony Teoh
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Huang JY, Samarasena JB, Tsujino T, Lee J, Hu KQ, McLaren CE, Chen WP, Chang KJ. EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with a simple novel device: a human pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 May;85(5):996-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.026. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
Huang JY, Samarasena JB, Tsujino T, Chang KJ. EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with a novel 25-gauge needle device versus standard transjugular approach: a comparison animal study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Aug;84(2):358-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.032. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017.519
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.