Trial Outcomes & Findings for Additional Long-Term Follow-up for Subjects Implanted With a CyPass® Micro-Stent (NCT NCT04629521)
NCT ID: NCT04629521
Last Updated: 2024-04-26
Results Overview
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in subjects, users or other persons, whether or not related to the investigational medical device (test product). This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study and includes sight-threatening adverse events as specified in the protocol. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
COMPLETED
NA
54 participants
Month 96 (Year 8) to Month 120 (Year 10) postoperative
2024-04-26
Participant Flow
Participants were enrolled from 12 investigative sites located in the United States.
This reporting group includes all enrolled participants.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
54
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
46
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Subject withdrew consent
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Enrolled in error
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Additional Long-Term Follow-up for Subjects Implanted With a CyPass® Micro-Stent
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 Participants
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
78.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.87 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
\Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Endothelial Cell Density (ECD)
|
2403.93 cells per square millimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 362.028 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8) to Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in subjects, users or other persons, whether or not related to the investigational medical device (test product). This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study and includes sight-threatening adverse events as specified in the protocol. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Sight-threatening Adverse Events (AEs)
Persistent BCDVA loss of 3 lines or more compared to best BCDVA collected at any time during study
|
18.5 percentage of eyes
Interval 9.3 to 31.4
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Sight-threatening Adverse Events (AEs)
Endophthalmitis
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 6.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Sight-threatening Adverse Events (AEs)
Corneal decompensation
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 6.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Sight-threatening Adverse Events (AEs)
Retinal detachment
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 6.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Sight-threatening Adverse Events (AEs)
Severe choroidal hemorrhage or detachment
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 6.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Sight-threatening Adverse Events (AEs)
Aqueous misdirection
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 6.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8) to Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in subjects, users or other persons, whether or not related to the investigational medical device (test product). This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study and includes ocular events other than sight-threatening adverse events. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events
Visual Field Defect
|
37.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 24.3 to 51.3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events
Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss
|
11.1 percentage of eyes
Interval 4.2 to 22.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events
Trabeculectomy
|
3.7 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.5 to 12.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events
Cystoid Macular Oedema
|
1.9 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 9.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events
Visual Acuity Reduced
|
38.9 percentage of eyes
Interval 25.9 to 53.1
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events
Post Procedural Complication
|
9.3 percentage of eyes
Interval 3.1 to 20.3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events
Device Placement Issue
|
5.6 percentage of eyes
Interval 1.2 to 15.4
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events
Hypotony Of Eye
|
3.7 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.5 to 12.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events
Intraocular Pressure Increased
|
3.7 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.5 to 12.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events
Optic Nerve Cup/Disc Ratio
|
3.7 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.5 to 12.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events
Dermatitis
|
1.9 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 9.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events
Device Dislocation
|
1.9 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 9.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events
Trabeculoplasty
|
1.9 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 9.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=53 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 96 (Year 8)
|
1802.49 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 520.329
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 108 (Year 9)
|
1668.80 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 707.729
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 120 (Year 10)
|
1574.73 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 714.996
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=53 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Month 96 (Year 8)
|
1802.49 cells per millimeter squared
Interval 1321.26 to 2283.71
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Month 108 (Year 9)
|
1668.80 cells per millimeter squared
Interval 1448.26 to 1889.35
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Month 120 (Year 10)
|
1574.73 cells per millimeter squared
Interval 1339.73 to 1809.74
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=7 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
0 percentile
|
909.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
5th percentile
|
909.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
25th percentile
|
1412.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
50th percentile
|
1959.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
75th percentile
|
2185.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
95th percentile
|
2460.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
100th percentile
|
2460.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 108 (Year 9) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=42 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
0 percentile
|
458.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
95th percentile
|
2546.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
5th percentile
|
561.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
25th percentile
|
805.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
50th percentile
|
1867.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
75th percentile
|
2222.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
100th percentile
|
2660.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=38 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
0 percentile
|
413.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
5th percentile
|
415.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
25th percentile
|
796.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
50th percentile
|
1640.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
75th percentile
|
2165.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
95th percentile
|
2597.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
100th percentile
|
2800.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Peripheral ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the peripheral cornea. This measurement is important for detecting peripheral corneal diseases, monitoring progression of corneal diseases, assessing the impact of contact lens wear, and ensuring optimal surgical planning (i.e., corneal transplantation). Peripheral ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of endothelial cells. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=53 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 96 (Year 8)
|
1844.51 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 684.727
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 108 (Year 9)
|
1739.44 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 779.814
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 120 (Year 10)
|
1688.74 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 803.605
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Peripheral ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the peripheral cornea. This measurement is important for detecting peripheral corneal diseases, monitoring progression of corneal diseases, assessing the impact of contact lens wear, and ensuring optimal surgical planning (i.e., corneal transplantation). Peripheral ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of endothelial cells. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=53 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Month 96 (Year 8)
|
1844.51 cells per millimeter squared
Interval 1211.25 to 2477.78
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Month 108 (Year 9)
|
1739.44 cells per millimeter squared
Interval 1496.44 to 1982.45
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Month 120 (Year 10)
|
1688.74 cells per millimeter squared
Interval 1388.87 to 1988.61
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Peripheral ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the peripheral cornea. This measurement is important for detecting peripheral corneal diseases, monitoring progression of corneal diseases, assessing the impact of contact lens wear, and ensuring optimal surgical planning (i.e., corneal transplantation). Peripheral ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of endothelial cells. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=7 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
0 percentile
|
489.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
5th percentile
|
489.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
25th percentile
|
1390.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
50th percentile
|
2132.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
75th percentile
|
2227.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
95th percentile
|
2465.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
100th percentile
|
2465.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 108 (Year 9) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Peripheral ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the peripheral cornea. This measurement is important for detecting peripheral corneal diseases, monitoring progression of corneal diseases, assessing the impact of contact lens wear, and ensuring optimal surgical planning (i.e., corneal transplantation). Peripheral ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of endothelial cells. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=42 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
100th percentile
|
2814.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
0 percentile
|
449.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
5th percentile
|
510.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
25th percentile
|
1024.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
50th percentile
|
2020.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
75th percentile
|
2341.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
95th percentile
|
2772.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Peripheral ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the peripheral cornea. This measurement is important for detecting peripheral corneal diseases, monitoring progression of corneal diseases, assessing the impact of contact lens wear, and ensuring optimal surgical planning (i.e., corneal transplantation). Peripheral ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of endothelial cells. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=30 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
0 percentile
|
353.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
5th percentile
|
477.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
25th percentile
|
856.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
50th percentile
|
1865.4 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
75th percentile
|
2345.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
95th percentile
|
2637.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Peripheral (Nasal) Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
100th percentile
|
3183.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
The CECCV is a measurement used in assessing the variability and quantifying the degree of variation in endothelial cell size within the central cornea. The CECCV measurements were obtained using specular microscopy from endothelial cells within the central region of the cornea. A higher CECCV suggests greater variability in endothelial cell size within the central cornea and may suggest underlying endothelial cell pathology, such as stress, aging, or certain corneal diseases (e.g. Fuch's endothelial dystrophy). A lower CECCV indicates more uniform cell size distribution, which is typically associated with a healthier endothelial function. This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=53 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 96 (Year 8)
|
28.19 unitless
Standard Deviation 3.189
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 108 (Year 9)
|
29.25 unitless
Standard Deviation 5.507
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 120 (Year 10)
|
30.57 unitless
Standard Deviation 5.001
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
The CECCV is a measurement used in assessing the variability and quantifying the degree of variation in endothelial cell size within the central cornea. The CECCV measurements were obtained using specular microscopy from endothelial cells within the central region of the cornea. A higher CECCV suggests greater variability in endothelial cell size within the central cornea and may suggest underlying endothelial cell pathology, such as stress, aging, or certain corneal diseases (e.g. Fuch's endothelial dystrophy). A lower CECCV indicates more uniform cell size distribution, which is typically associated with a healthier endothelial function. This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=7 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
0 percentile
|
23.8 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
95th percentile
|
32.3 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
5th percentile
|
23.8 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
25th percentile
|
24.8 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
50th percentile
|
28.2 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
75th percentile
|
31.0 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
100th percentile
|
32.3 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 108 (Year 9) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
The CECCV is a measurement used in assessing the variability and quantifying the degree of variation in endothelial cell size within the central cornea. The CECCV measurements were obtained using specular microscopy from endothelial cells within the central region of the cornea. A higher CECCV suggests greater variability in endothelial cell size within the central cornea and may suggest underlying endothelial cell pathology, such as stress, aging, or certain corneal diseases (e.g. Fuch's endothelial dystrophy). A lower CECCV indicates more uniform cell size distribution, which is typically associated with a healthier endothelial function. This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=42 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
0 percentile
|
8.0 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
5th percentile
|
20.5 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
25th percentile
|
27.0 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
50th percentile
|
29.4 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
75th percentile
|
32.2 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
95th percentile
|
36.3 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
100th percentile
|
39.5 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
The CECCV is a measurement used in assessing the variability and quantifying the degree of variation in endothelial cell size within the central cornea. The CECCV measurements were obtained using specular microscopy from endothelial cells within the central region of the cornea. A higher CECCV suggests greater variability in endothelial cell size within the central cornea and may suggest underlying endothelial cell pathology, such as stress, aging, or certain corneal diseases (e.g. Fuch's endothelial dystrophy). A lower CECCV indicates more uniform cell size distribution, which is typically associated with a healthier endothelial function. This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=38 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
50th percentile
|
30.8 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
75th percentile
|
33.8 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
0 percentile
|
16.5 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
5th percentile
|
21.5 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
25th percentile
|
27.8 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
95th percentile
|
38.8 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation (CECCV) Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
100th percentile
|
40.5 unitless
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
The CEH is a measurement used in assessing the regularity of endothelial cell shape within the central cornea. It provides insights into the structural integrity of the corneal endothelium, aiding in the evaluation of corneal health and diagnosis of endothelial cell-related pathologies. The CEH measurement was obtained using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that assesses the regularity of endothelial cell shape within the central cornea. A normal cornea is of hexagonal shape. A higher CEH indicates a greater proportion of endothelial cells with a hexagonal shape, which is associated with a more regular and healthier endothelial cell morphology. A lower CEH suggests decreased hexagonality and may indicate abnormalities in endothelial cell structure or function. This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=53 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 96 (Year 8)
|
64.33 percentage of hexagonality
Standard Deviation 5.223
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 108 (Year 9)
|
60.96 percentage of hexagonality
Standard Deviation 8.235
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 120 (Year 10)
|
62.09 percentage of hexagonality
Standard Deviation 8.589
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
The CEH is a measurement used in assessing the regularity of endothelial cell shape within the central cornea. It provides insights into the structural integrity of the corneal endothelium, aiding in the evaluation of corneal health and diagnosis of endothelial cell-related pathologies. The CEH measurement was obtained using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that assesses the regularity of endothelial cell shape within the central cornea. A normal cornea is of hexagonal shape. A higher CEH indicates a greater proportion of endothelial cells with a hexagonal shape, which is associated with a more regular and healthier endothelial cell morphology. A lower CEH suggests decreased hexagonality and may indicate abnormalities in endothelial cell structure or function. This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=7 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
0 percentile
|
57.7 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
5th percentile
|
57.7 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
25th percentile
|
59.3 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
50th percentile
|
66.0 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
75th percentile
|
68.3 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
95th percentile
|
71.5 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
100th percentile
|
71.5 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 108 (Year 9) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
The CEH is a measurement used in assessing the regularity of endothelial cell shape within the central cornea. It provides insights into the structural integrity of the corneal endothelium, aiding in the evaluation of corneal health and diagnosis of endothelial cell-related pathologies. The CEH measurement was obtained using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that assesses the regularity of endothelial cell shape within the central cornea. A normal cornea is of hexagonal shape. A higher CEH indicates a greater proportion of endothelial cells with a hexagonal shape, which is associated with a more regular and healthier endothelial cell morphology. A lower CEH suggests decreased hexagonality and may indicate abnormalities in endothelial cell structure or function. This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=42 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
0 percentile
|
41.0 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
5th percentile
|
44.3 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
25th percentile
|
57.8 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
50th percentile
|
60.8 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
75th percentile
|
65.7 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
95th percentile
|
72.5 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality (CEH) Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
100th percentile
|
80.7 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
The CEH is a measurement used in assessing the regularity of endothelial cell shape within the central cornea. It provides insights into the structural integrity of the corneal endothelium, aiding in the evaluation of corneal health and diagnosis of endothelial cell-related pathologies. The CEH measurement was obtained using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that assesses the regularity of endothelial cell shape within the central cornea. A normal cornea is of hexagonal shape. A higher CEH indicates a greater proportion of endothelial cells with a hexagonal shape, which is associated with a more regular and healthier endothelial cell morphology. A lower CEH suggests decreased hexagonality and may indicate abnormalities in endothelial cell structure or function. This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=38 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
0 percentile
|
43.3 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
5th percentile
|
44.0 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
25th percentile
|
57.8 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
50th percentile
|
63.4 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
75th percentile
|
68.2 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
95th percentile
|
75.8 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Hexagonality Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
100th percentile
|
78.3 percentage of hexagonality
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A negative change value indicates a lessening of corneal health and function. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study and data from the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=53 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Change from Baseline at Month 96 (Year 8)
|
-612.31 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 704.719
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Change from Baseline at Month 108 (Year 9)
|
-762.63 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 706.732
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Change from Baseline at Month 120 (Year 10)
|
-819.62 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 696.501
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A negative change value indicates a lessening of corneal health and function. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study and data from the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=53 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Change from Baseline at Month 96 (Year 8)
|
-612.31 cells per millimeter squared
Interval -1264.07 to 39.44
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Change from Baseline at Month 108 (Year 9)
|
-762.63 cells per millimeter squared
Interval -982.86 to -542.39
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Change from Baseline at Month 120 (Year 10)
|
-819.62 cells per millimeter squared
Interval -1048.56 to -590.69
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 96 (Year 8) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A negative change value indicates a lessening of corneal health and function. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study and data from the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=7 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
5th percentile
|
-1802.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
25th percentile
|
-1246.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
50th percentile
|
-444.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
75th percentile
|
60.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
95th percentile
|
161.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
100th percentile
|
161.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
0 percentile
|
-1802.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 108 (Year 9) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A negative change value indicates a lessening of corneal health and function. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study and data from the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=42 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
0 percentile
|
-2028.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
5th percentile
|
-1893.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
25th percentile
|
-1450.1 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
50th percentile
|
-590.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
75th percentile
|
-198.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
95th percentile
|
308.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
100th percentile
|
807.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A negative change value indicates a lessening of corneal health and function. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study and data from the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=38 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
0 percentile
|
-1937.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
5th percentile
|
-1873.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
25th percentile
|
-1416.4 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
50th percentile
|
-907.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
75th percentile
|
-232.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
95th percentile
|
253.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
100th percentile
|
752.1 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A negative percent change value indicates a worsening of corneal health and function. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study and data from the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=53 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Change from Baseline at Month 96 (Year 8)
|
-22.77 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.468
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Change from Baseline at Month 108 (Year 9)
|
-30.60 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.070
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Change from Baseline at Month 120 (Year 10)
|
-33.57 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.673
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A negative percent change value indicates a worsening of corneal health and function. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study and data from the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=53 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Change from Baseline at Month 96 (Year 8)
|
-22.77 percent change
Interval -47.25 to 1.71
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Change from Baseline at Month 108 (Year 9)
|
-30.60 percent change
Interval -40.28 to -20.92
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Change from Baseline at Month 120 (Year 10)
|
-33.57 percent change
Interval -43.98 to -23.16
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 96 (Year 8) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A negative percent change value indicates a worsening of corneal health and function. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study and data from the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=7 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
0 percentile
|
-66.5 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
5th percentile
|
-66.5 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
25th percentile
|
-46.9 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
50th percentile
|
-16.9 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
75th percentile
|
3.8 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
95th percentile
|
7.0 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
100th percentile
|
7.0 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 108 (Year 9) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A negative percent change value indicates a worsening of corneal health and function. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study and data from the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=42 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
0 percentile
|
-79.9 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
5th percentile
|
-74.8 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
25th percentile
|
-65.5 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
50th percentile
|
-24.9 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
75th percentile
|
-8.1 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
95th percentile
|
18.0 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
100th percentile
|
50.1 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A negative percent change value indicates a worsening of corneal health and function. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study and data from the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=38 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
0 percentile
|
-81.9 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
5th percentile
|
-80.1 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
25th percentile
|
-61.9 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
50th percentile
|
-35.8 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
75th percentile
|
-8.6 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
95th percentile
|
16.7 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
100th percentile
|
46.7 percent change
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 (Year 1), Month 24 (Year 2), Month 36 (Year 3), Month 48 (Year 4), Month 60 (Year 5), Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS, COMPASS XT, and COMPASS XXT studies. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <1000 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 3
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 6.8
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <1000 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 6
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <1000 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 24 (Year 2)
|
1.9 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 10.1
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <1000 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 108 (Year 9)
|
26.2 percentage of eyes
Interval 13.9 to 42.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <1000 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 120 (Year 10)
|
31.6 percentage of eyes
Interval 17.5 to 48.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <1000 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 12 (Year 1)
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 6.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <1000 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 36 (Year 3)
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 70.8
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <1000 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 48 (Year 4)
|
9.7 percentage of eyes
Interval 2.0 to 25.8
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <1000 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 60 (Year 5)
|
6.7 percentage of eyes
Interval 1.4 to 18.3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <1000 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 96 (Year 8)
|
14.3 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.4 to 57.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 (Year 1), Month 24 (Year 2), Month 36 (Year 3), Month 48 (Year 4), Month 60 (Year 5), Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS, COMPASS XT, and COMPASS XXT studies. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <500 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 12 (Year 1)
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 6.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <500 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 24 (Year 2)
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <500 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 36 (Year 3)
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 70.8
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <500 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 48 (Year 4)
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 11.2
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <500 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 96 (Year 8)
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 41.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <500 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 108 (Year 9)
|
2.4 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.1 to 12.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <500 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 120 (Year 10)
|
7.9 percentage of eyes
Interval 1.7 to 21.4
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <500 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 3
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 6.8
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <500 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 6
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <500 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 60 (Year 5)
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 7.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 (Year 1), Month 24 (Year 2), Month 36 (Year 3), Month 48 (Year 4), Month 60 (Year 5), Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. This measurement helps in monitoring the progression of corneal diseases, particularly in conditions where there is a gradual loss of endothelial cells leading to corneal edema and vision loss. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of the corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS, COMPASS XT, and COMPASS XXT studies. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Loss (ECL) Greater Than 30 Percent From Baseline
>30% Loss from Baseline at Month 3
|
9.6 percentage of eyes
Interval 3.2 to 21.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Loss (ECL) Greater Than 30 Percent From Baseline
>30% Loss from Baseline at Month 6
|
9.4 percentage of eyes
Interval 3.1 to 20.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Loss (ECL) Greater Than 30 Percent From Baseline
>30% Loss from Baseline at Month 12 (Year 1)
|
13.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 5.4 to 24.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Loss (ECL) Greater Than 30 Percent From Baseline
>30% Loss from Baseline at Month 24 (Year 2)
|
9.4 percentage of eyes
Interval 3.1 to 20.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Loss (ECL) Greater Than 30 Percent From Baseline
>30% Loss from Baseline at Month 36 (Year 3)
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.0 to 70.8
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Loss (ECL) Greater Than 30 Percent From Baseline
>30% Loss from Baseline at Month 48 (Year 4)
|
19.4 percentage of eyes
Interval 7.5 to 37.5
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Loss (ECL) Greater Than 30 Percent From Baseline
>30% Loss from Baseline at Month 60 (Year 5)
|
26.7 percentage of eyes
Interval 14.6 to 41.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Loss (ECL) Greater Than 30 Percent From Baseline
>30% Loss from Baseline at Month 108 (Year 9)
|
40.5 percentage of eyes
Interval 25.6 to 56.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Loss (ECL) Greater Than 30 Percent From Baseline
>30% Loss from Baseline at Month 120 (Year 10)
|
52.6 percentage of eyes
Interval 35.8 to 69.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Central Endothelial Cell Loss (ECL) Greater Than 30 Percent From Baseline
>30% Loss from Baseline at Month 96 (Year 8)
|
28.6 percentage of eyes
Interval 3.7 to 71.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Peripheral ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the peripheral cornea. This measurement is important for detecting peripheral corneal diseases, monitoring progression of corneal diseases, assessing the impact of contact lens wear, and ensuring optimal surgical planning (i.e., corneal transplantation). Peripheral ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of endothelial cells. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=53 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <1000 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 96 (Year 8)
|
14.3 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.4 to 57.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <1000 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 108 (Year 9)
|
23.8 percentage of eyes
Interval 12.1 to 39.5
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <1000 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 120 (Year 20)
|
30.0 percentage of eyes
Interval 14.7 to 49.4
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Peripheral ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the peripheral cornea. This measurement is important for detecting peripheral corneal diseases, monitoring progression of corneal diseases, assessing the impact of contact lens wear, and ensuring optimal surgical planning (i.e., corneal transplantation). Peripheral ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of endothelial cells. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=53 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <500 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 120 (Year 20)
|
6.7 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.8 to 22.1
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <500 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 96 (Year 8)
|
14.3 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.4 to 57.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes According to Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) <500 Cells Per Millimeter Squared
Month 108 (Year 9)
|
4.8 percentage of eyes
Interval 0.6 to 16.2
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 12 (Year 1), Month 24 (Year 2), Month 36 (Year 3), Month 48 (Year 4), Month 60 (Year 5), Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
The annualized rate of change in central ECD is used to quantify the rate at which the central ECD changes over time. The annualized rate of change in central ECD is determined by dividing the change in ECD by the duration of observation (in years). A positive annualized rate of change indicates an increase in central ECD over time, suggesting a favorable outcome or the effectiveness of interventions aimed at preserving endothelial cell density. A negative annualized rate of change signifies a decrease in central ECD, which may indicate endothelial cell loss due to factors such as aging, disease progression, or the surgical interventions. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study, the COMPASS XT study, and the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Annualized Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Year 9 to Year 10
|
-44.00 [cells per millimeter squared] per year
Standard Deviation 221.290
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Baseline to Year 1
|
-267.77 [cells per millimeter squared] per year
Standard Deviation 405.731
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Year 1 to Year 2
|
-23.80 [cells per millimeter squared] per year
Standard Deviation 149.533
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Year 2 to Year 3
|
-118.83 [cells per millimeter squared] per year
Standard Deviation 90.832
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Year 3 to Year 4
|
-63.57 [cells per millimeter squared] per year
Standard Deviation 57.630
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Year 4 to Year 5
|
-95.54 [cells per millimeter squared] per year
Standard Deviation 191.951
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Year 8 to Year 9
|
-138.10 [cells per millimeter squared] per year
Standard Deviation 169.597
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 12 (Year 1), Month 24 (Year 2), Month 36 (Year 3), Month 48 (Year 4), Month 60 (Year 5), Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
The annualized rate of change in central ECD is used to quantify the rate at which the central ECD changes over time. The annualized rate of change in central ECD is determined by dividing the change in ECD by the duration of observation (in years). A positive annualized rate of change indicates an increase in central ECD over time, suggesting a favorable outcome or the effectiveness of interventions aimed at preserving endothelial cell density. A negative annualized rate of change signifies a decrease in central ECD, which may indicate endothelial cell loss due to factors such as aging, disease progression, or the surgical interventions. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study, the COMPASS XT study, and the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Annualized Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Baseline to Year 1
|
-267.77 [cells per millimeter squared] per year
Interval -378.51 to -157.02
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Year 4 to Year 5
|
-95.54 [cells per millimeter squared] per year
Interval -167.22 to -23.87
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Year 8 to Year 9
|
-138.10 [cells per millimeter squared] per year
Interval -316.08 to 39.88
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Year 9 to Year 10
|
-44.00 [cells per millimeter squared] per year
Interval -129.81 to 41.81
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Year 1 to Year 2
|
-23.80 [cells per millimeter squared] per year
Interval -65.01 to 17.42
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Year 2 to Year 3
|
-118.83 [cells per millimeter squared] per year
Interval -344.47 to 106.81
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Year 3 to Year 4
|
-63.57 [cells per millimeter squared] per year
Interval -206.73 to 79.59
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 12 (Year 1), Month 24 (Year 2), Month 36 (Year 3), Month 48 (Year 4), Month 60 (Year 5), Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
The annualized rate of change in central ECD is used to quantify the rate at which the central ECD changes over time. The annualized rate of change in central ECD is determined by dividing the change in ECD by the duration of observation (in years). A positive percent change per year indicates an increase in central ECD over time, suggesting a favorable outcome or the effectiveness of interventions aimed at preserving endothelial cell density. A negative percent change per year may indicate endothelial cell loss due to factors such as aging, disease progression, or the surgical interventions. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study, the COMPASS XT study, and the COMPASS XXT study. Central ECD was measured in cells per millimeter squared. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Annualized Percent Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Year 3 to Year 4
|
-2.72 percent change per year
Standard Deviation 2.446
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Percent Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Year 9 to Year 10
|
-2.82 percent change per year
Standard Deviation 14.357
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Percent Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Baseline to Year 1
|
-10.15 percent change per year
Standard Deviation 16.780
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Percent Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Year 1 to Year 2
|
-1.24 percent change per year
Standard Deviation 9.180
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Percent Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Year 2 to Year 3
|
-4.86 percent change per year
Standard Deviation 3.780
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Percent Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Year 4 to Year 5
|
-5.14 percent change per year
Standard Deviation 9.946
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Percent Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Year 8 to Year 9
|
-8.52 percent change per year
Standard Deviation 10.508
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 12 (Year 1), Month 24 (Year 2), Month 36 (Year 3), Month 48 (Year 4), Month 60 (Year 5), Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
The annualized rate of change in central ECD is used to quantify the rate at which the central ECD changes over time. The annualized rate of change in central ECD is determined by dividing the change in ECD by the duration of observation (in years). A positive percent change per year indicates an increase in central ECD over time, suggesting a favorable outcome or the effectiveness of interventions aimed at preserving endothelial cell density. A negative percent change per year may indicate endothelial cell loss due to factors such as aging, disease progression, or the surgical interventions. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study, the COMPASS XT study, and the COMPASS XXT study. Central ECD was measured in cells per millimeter squared. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Annualized Percent Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Year 2 to Year 3
|
-4.86 percent change per year
Interval -14.25 to 4.53
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Percent Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Year 3 to Year 4
|
-2.72 percent change per year
Interval -8.79 to 3.36
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Percent Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Year 4 to Year 5
|
-5.14 percent change per year
Interval -8.85 to -1.43
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Percent Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Year 8 to Year 9
|
-8.52 percent change per year
Interval -19.54 to 2.51
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Percent Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Year 9 to Year 10
|
-2.82 percent change per year
Interval -8.39 to 2.74
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Percent Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Baseline to Year 1
|
-10.15 percent change per year
Interval -14.73 to -5.57
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Annualized Percent Rate of Change in Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Each Year of Observation Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Year 1 to Year 2
|
-1.24 percent change per year
Interval -3.77 to 1.29
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Corneal sequelae are occurrences of complications related to ECL in the cornea and may include corneal edema, decreased visual acuity, corneal decompensation, bullous keratopathy, etc. Corneal sequelae were quantified by counting the instances where patients experienced complications attributable to endothelial cell loss. A higher number of corneal sequelae events may indicate rapid disease progression or inadequate management of conditions leading to endothelial cell loss. A lower number of corneal sequelae events may indicate a favorable response to treatment and successful disease treatment or treatment stabilization. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Corneal Sequelae Events Associated With Endothelial Cell Loss (ECL)
|
0 corneal sequelae
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 (Year 1), Month 24 (Year 2), Month 36 (Year 3), Month 48 (Year 4), Month 60 (Year 5), Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10)Population: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study, the COMPASS XT study, and the COMPASS XXT study. Only data for subjects with rings visible on the CyPass MicroStent device and ECD data is presented. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 6
|
1769.03 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 624.608
|
2394.50 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is undefined when there is no variability in the data
|
2206.81 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 383.001
|
2226.18 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 324.459
|
2160.54 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 309.941
|
2012.45 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 66.256
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 3
|
1913.03 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 583.158
|
—
|
2159.24 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 467.711
|
2154.11 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 309.015
|
2368.27 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 306.424
|
2035.25 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 7.707
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 12 (Year 1)
|
2000.93 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 461.735
|
1756.30 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is undefined when there is no variability in the data
|
2272.34 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 345.825
|
2261.04 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 394.756
|
2139.71 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 307.753
|
1492.95 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 293.379
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 36 (Year 3)
|
—
|
—
|
2324.50 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is undefined when there is no variability in the data
|
2338.00 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 199.121
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 120 (Year 10)
|
1897.05 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 730.546
|
1663.71 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 593.233
|
1941.97 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 661.397
|
1486.70 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 721.315
|
924.90 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 421.601
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 24 (Year 2)
|
1938.18 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 529.916
|
2449.60 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 70.295
|
2189.33 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 388.648
|
2144.41 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 400.509
|
2186.23 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 362.508
|
1309.70 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 870.024
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 48 (Year 4)
|
2062.20 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 364.440
|
2555.70 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is undefined when there is no variability in the data
|
2307.67 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 280.270
|
2117.21 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 301.552
|
1616.86 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 601.855
|
742.00 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 36.062
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 60 (Year 5)
|
2292.05 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 381.087
|
2342.00 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 27.577
|
2159.78 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 375.998
|
2016.68 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 495.751
|
1645.16 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 433.827
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 96 (Year 8)
|
1660.70 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is undefined when there is no variability in the data
|
1412.50 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is undefined when there is no variability in the data
|
2185.30 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is undefined when there is no variability in the data
|
2209.60 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 354.119
|
1469.85 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 792.172
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 108 (Year 9)
|
1894.88 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 639.384
|
1735.63 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 232.046
|
2049.77 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 585.452
|
1720.05 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 740.783
|
925.40 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 401.250
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3 postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study. Only data for subjects with rings visible on the CyPass MicroStent device and ECD data is presented. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=31 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
n=31 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
n=31 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
n=31 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
n=31 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 3
0 percentile
|
1364.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
1230.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1592.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2179.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2029.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 3
50th percentile
|
1920.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2361.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2171.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2204.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2035.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 3
75th percentile
|
2416.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
2506.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2351.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2721.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2040.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 3
100th percentile
|
2447.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
2549.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2600.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2721.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2040.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 3
5th percentile
|
1364.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
1230.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1592.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2179.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2029.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 3
25th percentile
|
1409.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
1879.4 cells per millimeter squared
|
2025.1 cells per millimeter squared
|
2179.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2029.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 3
95th percentile
|
2447.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
2549.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2600.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2721.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2040.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6 postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study. Only data for subjects with rings visible on the CyPass MicroStent device and ECD data is presented. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=34 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
n=34 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
n=34 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
n=34 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
n=34 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
n=34 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 6
0 percentile
|
1361.1 cells per millimeter squared
|
2394.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
1418.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1672.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1693.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1965.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 6
5th percentile
|
1361.1 cells per millimeter squared
|
2394.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
1418.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1672.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1693.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1965.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 6
25th percentile
|
1361.1 cells per millimeter squared
|
2394.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2043.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2109.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
1899.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1965.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 6
75th percentile
|
2488.1 cells per millimeter squared
|
2394.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2463.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
2558.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2304.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2059.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 6
50th percentile
|
1457.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
2394.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2337.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2257.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2248.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
2012.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 6
95th percentile
|
2488.1 cells per millimeter squared
|
2394.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2547.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2662.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2650.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2059.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 6
100th percentile
|
2488.1 cells per millimeter squared
|
2394.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2547.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2662.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2650.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2059.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12 (Year 1) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study. Only data for subjects with rings visible on the CyPass MicroStent device and ECD data is presented. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=48 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
n=48 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
n=48 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
n=48 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
n=48 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
n=48 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 12 (Year 1)
25th percentile
|
1666.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
1756.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2146.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2125.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1907.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1285.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 12 (Year 1)
0 percentile
|
1357.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1756.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1388.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1340.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
1659.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
1285.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 12 (Year 1)
5th percentile
|
1357.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1756.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1388.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1531.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1659.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
1285.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 12 (Year 1)
50th percentile
|
2139.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
1756.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2414.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2359.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2234.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
1493.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 12 (Year 1)
75th percentile
|
2335.1 cells per millimeter squared
|
1756.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2480.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2563.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2293.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
1700.4 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 12 (Year 1)
95th percentile
|
2366.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1756.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2579.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
2666.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2588.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
1700.4 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 12 (Year 1)
100th percentile
|
2366.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1756.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2579.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
2852.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2588.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
1700.4 cells per millimeter squared
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 24 (Year 2) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study. Only data for subjects with rings visible on the CyPass MicroStent device and ECD data is presented. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=50 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
n=50 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
n=50 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
n=50 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
n=50 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
n=50 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 24 (Year 2)
5th percentile
|
1350.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
2370.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
1301.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1526.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1390.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
694.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 24 (Year 2)
50th percentile
|
2047.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2474.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2345.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
2152.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2226.4 cells per millimeter squared
|
1309.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 24 (Year 2)
75th percentile
|
2318.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2503.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
2443.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2503.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
2373.1 cells per millimeter squared
|
1924.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 24 (Year 2)
95th percentile
|
2542.1 cells per millimeter squared
|
2503.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
2624.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2757.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
2732.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1924.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 24 (Year 2)
100th percentile
|
2542.1 cells per millimeter squared
|
2503.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
2624.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2757.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
2732.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1924.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 24 (Year 2)
0 percentile
|
1350.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
2370.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
1301.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1526.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1390.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
694.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 24 (Year 2)
25th percentile
|
1432.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
2370.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
1961.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1721.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
2071.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
694.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 36 (Year 3) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS XT study. Only data for subjects with rings visible on the CyPass MicroStent device and ECD data is presented. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=3 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
n=3 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 36 (Year 3)
0 percentile
|
2324.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2197.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 36 (Year 3)
5th percentile
|
2324.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2197.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 36 (Year 3)
75th percentile
|
2324.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2478.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 36 (Year 3)
25th percentile
|
2324.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2197.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 36 (Year 3)
50th percentile
|
2324.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2338.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 36 (Year 3)
95th percentile
|
2324.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2478.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 36 (Year 3)
100th percentile
|
2324.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2478.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 48 (Year 4) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS XT study. Only data for subjects with rings visible on the CyPass MicroStent device and ECD data is presented. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=31 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
n=31 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
n=31 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
n=31 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
n=31 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
n=31 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 48 (Year 4)
0 percentile
|
1684.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2555.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1678.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1524.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
752.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
716.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 48 (Year 4)
5th percentile
|
1684.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2555.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1678.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1524.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
752.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
716.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 48 (Year 4)
25th percentile
|
1684.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2555.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2304.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2034.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
1468.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
716.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 48 (Year 4)
50th percentile
|
2089.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
2555.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2334.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2107.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
1550.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
742.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 48 (Year 4)
75th percentile
|
2412.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2555.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2475.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
2375.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1940.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
767.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 48 (Year 4)
95th percentile
|
2412.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2555.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2683.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2537.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2372.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
767.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 48 (Year 4)
100th percentile
|
2412.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2555.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2683.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2537.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2372.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
767.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 60 (Year 5) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS XT study. Only data for subjects with rings visible on the CyPass MicroStent device and ECD data is presented. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=43 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
n=43 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
n=43 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
n=43 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
n=43 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 60 (Year 5)
50th percentile
|
2342.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2342.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2277.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
2035.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
1743.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 60 (Year 5)
0 percentile
|
1683.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2322.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
1345.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1109.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
741.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 60 (Year 5)
5th percentile
|
1683.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2322.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
1345.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1109.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
741.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 60 (Year 5)
25th percentile
|
2050.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
2322.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2080.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1734.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
1372.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 60 (Year 5)
75th percentile
|
2589.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2361.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2411.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2417.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1912.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 60 (Year 5)
95th percentile
|
2743.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2361.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2555.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2958.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2242.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 60 (Year 5)
100th percentile
|
2743.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2361.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2555.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2958.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2242.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS XXT study. Only data for subjects with rings visible on the CyPass MicroStent device and ECD data is presented. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=7 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
n=7 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
n=7 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
n=7 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
n=7 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
25th percentile
|
1660.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1412.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2185.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1959.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
909.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
0 percentile
|
1660.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1412.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2185.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1959.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
909.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
5th percentile
|
1660.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1412.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2185.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1959.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
909.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
50th percentile
|
1660.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1412.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2185.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2209.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
1469.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
75th percentile
|
1660.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1412.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2185.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2460.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2030.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
95th percentile
|
1660.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1412.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2185.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2460.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2030.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
100th percentile
|
1660.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1412.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2185.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2460.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2030.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 108 (Year 9) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS XXT study. Only data for subjects with rings visible on the CyPass MicroStent device and ECD data is presented. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=40 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
n=40 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
n=40 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
n=40 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
n=40 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
0 percentile
|
547.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
1438.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
699.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
458.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
568.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
5th percentile
|
547.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
1438.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
699.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
458.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
568.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
25th percentile
|
1612.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1583.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
2131.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
805.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
684.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
50th percentile
|
2180.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1750.1 cells per millimeter squared
|
2217.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
2014.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
783.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
75th percentile
|
2222.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
1887.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2362.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2301.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1057.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
95th percentile
|
2573.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
2003.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2660.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2546.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1674.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
100th percentile
|
2573.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
2003.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2660.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2546.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1674.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Central ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the central cornea. Central ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of corneal endothelial cells in the central cornea. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS XXT study. Only data for subjects with rings visible on the CyPass MicroStent device and ECD data is presented. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=36 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
n=36 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
n=36 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
n=36 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
n=36 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
75th percentile
|
2177.4 cells per millimeter squared
|
2102.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2359.1 cells per millimeter squared
|
1960.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
1094.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
95th percentile
|
2597.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2363.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2800.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2479.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1508.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
0 percentile
|
483.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
796.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
624.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
413.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
415.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
5th percentile
|
483.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
796.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
624.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
413.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
415.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
25th percentile
|
1881.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
951.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1503.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
782.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
640.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
50th percentile
|
2121.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1849.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2165.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1637.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
966.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Central Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
100th percentile
|
2597.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2363.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2800.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2479.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1508.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Peripheral ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the peripheral cornea. Peripheral ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of endothelial cells. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. Only data for subjects with rings visible on the CyPass MicroStent device and ECD data is presented. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=48 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
n=48 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
n=48 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
n=48 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
n=48 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 120 (Year 10)
|
2177.90 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 988.439
|
1955.98 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 348.144
|
1663.57 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 730.987
|
1683.19 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 909.922
|
976.46 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 550.677
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 96 (Year 8)
|
2132.70 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is undefined when there is no variability in the data
|
1390.60 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is undefined when there is no variability in the data
|
2227.00 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is undefined when there is no variability in the data
|
2103.20 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 152.028
|
1477.45 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 1396.889
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Month 108 (Year 9)
|
2062.49 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 728.658
|
1828.05 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 399.061
|
2087.86 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 599.144
|
1752.28 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 835.401
|
915.63 cells per millimeter squared
Standard Deviation 585.915
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Peripheral ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the peripheral cornea. Peripheral ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of endothelial cells. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. Only data for subjects with rings visible on the CyPass MicroStent device and ECD data is presented. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=7 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
n=7 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
n=7 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
n=7 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
n=7 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
5th percentile
|
2132.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1390.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
2227.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1995.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
489.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
0 percentile
|
2132.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1390.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
2227.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1995.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
489.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
25th percentile
|
2132.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1390.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
2227.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1995.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
489.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
50th percentile
|
2132.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1390.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
2227.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2103.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
1477.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
75th percentile
|
2132.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1390.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
2227.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2210.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2465.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
95th percentile
|
2132.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1390.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
2227.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2210.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2465.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 96 (Year 8)
100th percentile
|
2132.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
1390.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
2227.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2210.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2465.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 108 (Year 9) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Peripheral ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the peripheral cornea. Peripheral ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of endothelial cells. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. Only data for subjects with rings visible on the CyPass MicroStent device and ECD data is presented. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=40 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
n=40 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
n=40 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
n=40 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
n=40 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
0 percentile
|
516.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
1373.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
569.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
449.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
479.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
5th percentile
|
516.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
1373.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
569.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
449.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
479.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
25th percentile
|
1848.4 cells per millimeter squared
|
1575.9 cells per millimeter squared
|
2106.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
803.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
514.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
50th percentile
|
2272.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1796.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2262.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2037.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
633.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
75th percentile
|
2515.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
2080.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2331.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
2483.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
1283.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
95th percentile
|
2814.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2345.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2784.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2772.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1949.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 108 (Year 9)
100th percentile
|
2814.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2345.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2784.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2772.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
1949.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Peripheral ECD refers to the number of endothelial cells present per square millimeter in the peripheral cornea. Peripheral ECD was assessed using specular microscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for visualization and quantification of endothelial cells. A normal ECD in adults typically ranges between 2500 to 3000 cells per square millimeter, although this can vary depending on age and individual variation. A higher value indicates better corneal health and function. A lower value suggests potential endothelial dysfunction or damage. This analysis was performed data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. Only data for subjects with rings visible on the CyPass MicroStent device and ECD data is presented. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=30 Participants
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
n=30 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
n=30 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
n=30 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
n=30 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
0 percentile
|
526.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
1512.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
647.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
477.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
353.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
5th percentile
|
526.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
1512.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
647.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
477.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
353.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
25th percentile
|
2262.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
1695.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
922.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
683.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
643.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
50th percentile
|
2408.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2042.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
1709.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
2080.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
856.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
75th percentile
|
2507.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2157.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
2250.2 cells per millimeter squared
|
2412.6 cells per millimeter squared
|
1269.8 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
95th percentile
|
3183.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2371.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2597.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2637.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1759.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
|
Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Number of Rings Observed at the Visit Reported by Percentile - Month 120 (Year 10)
100th percentile
|
3183.7 cells per millimeter squared
|
2371.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
2597.0 cells per millimeter squared
|
2637.3 cells per millimeter squared
|
1759.5 cells per millimeter squared
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8) to Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
SSI events are additional surgical procedures performed after the initial placement of the CyPass micro-stent device to adjust its position or address issues related to its placement. SSI were noted through adverse event reporting, clinical evaluation, comprehensive documentation of outcome assessment and data analysis. A higher number of SSI events may indicate challenges or complications related to the initial placement of the CyPass device, technical difficulties during the initial surgery, device-related issues, or patient-specific factors contributing to the need for additional interventions. A lower number of SSI events may suggest that the initial device placement was successful and well-tolerated, with fewer complications or the need for adjustments. This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Secondary Surgical Intervention (SSI) Events to Modify the Device Position (eg, Repositioning, Trimming, Explantation)
|
0 secondary surgical interventions
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8) to Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
CyPass micro-stent movement and/or malposition refers to issues related to the displacement or improper positioning of the CyPass Micro-Stent in the eye's drainage angle. The investigator qualitatively and subjectively assessed the position of the device by counting the visible number of rings of the device during a gonioscopic exam, which used a specialized lens to visually assess the position and stability of the CyPass device. Movement and/or malposition may suggest a greater risk of complications or inadequate treatment of glaucoma. This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Eyes With CyPass Micro-Stent Movement and/or Malposition
|
7.4 percentage of eyes
Interval 2.1 to 17.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8) to Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
A corneal adverse event is an undesirable occurrence related to the cornea, such as inflammation, edema, epithelial defects, or other complications. The number of corneal adverse events caused by the CyPass Micro-Stent was assessed from patient reporting, clinical observation and documentation during patients' follow-up visits. This analysis was performed using data from visits in the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Corneal Adverse Events Caused by CyPass MicroStent
|
0 events
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 96 (Year 8) to Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit
Visual acuity was measured with correction in place using letter charts. BCVA \[synonymous with Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA)\] at each visit was compared to the participant's best achieved BCVA recorded throughout the 10-year period after CyPass implantation. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study, the COMPASS XT study, and the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 Participants
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Events of Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss of 10 Letters or More
|
21 events
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Visual field mean deviation is a measure used in visual field testing to assess the overall sensitivity of a patient's vision compared to a standardized norm. The Humphrey automated perimeter with the 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) standard testing method was used. Deviations were recorded in decibels. Normal deviation values are typically within 0 to -2 decibels (dB). A more negative number indicates decreased sensitivity and worsening of the overall visual field. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study and data from the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Visual Field Mean Deviation From COMPASS Trial Screening Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Change from Screening Visit at Month 96 (Year 8)
|
2.379 decibel
Standard Deviation 3.7404
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Visual Field Mean Deviation From COMPASS Trial Screening Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Change from Screening Visit at Month 108 (Year 9)
|
-1.176 decibel
Standard Deviation 6.1884
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Visual Field Mean Deviation From COMPASS Trial Screening Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Change from Screening Visit at Month 120 (Year 10)
|
-2.321 decibel
Standard Deviation 4.6707
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
Visual field mean deviation is a measure used in visual field testing to assess the overall sensitivity of a patient's vision compared to a standardized norm. The Humphrey automated perimeter with the 24-2 SITA standard testing method was used. Deviations were recorded in decibels. Normal deviation values are typically within 0 to -2 decibels (dB). A more negative number indicates decreased sensitivity and worsening of the overall visual field. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study and data from the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Change in Visual Field Mean Deviation From COMPASS Trial Screening Visit Reported Categorically - 2 Decibel (dB)
Change from Screening Visit at Month 96 (Year 8)
|
42.9 percentage of eyes
|
51.7 percentage of eyes
|
0.0 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Change in Visual Field Mean Deviation From COMPASS Trial Screening Visit Reported Categorically - 2 Decibel (dB)
Change from Screening Visit at Month 108 (Year 9)
|
9.8 percentage of eyes
|
51.2 percentage of eyes
|
39.0 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Change in Visual Field Mean Deviation From COMPASS Trial Screening Visit Reported Categorically - 2 Decibel (dB)
Change from Screening Visit at Month 120 (Year 10)
|
10.9 percentage of eyes
|
45.7 percentage of eyes
|
43.5 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
CCT is a measurement of the thickness of the cornea at its center and is assessed using a procedure called corneal pachymetry. A high CCT (thick cornea) indicates a central cornea thicker than average and may be associated with conditions such as corneal edema, Fuchs' dystrophy, or ocular hypertension. A low CCT (thin cornea) indicates a central cornea thinner than average and may be a risk factor for developing conditions such as glaucoma. A negative change value indicates a decrease in corneal thickness. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study and data from the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Change from Baseline at Month 108 (Year 9)
|
0.0 microns
Standard Deviation 22.84
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Change from Baseline at Month 120 (Year 10)
|
4.1 microns
Standard Deviation 25.09
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and Standard Deviation
Change from Baseline at Month 96 (Year 8)
|
1.9 microns
Standard Deviation 22.08
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (COMPASS Study) preoperative, Month 96 (Year 8), Month 108 (Year 9), Month 120 (Year 10) postoperativePopulation: All enrolled with data at visit. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of unique subjects contributing any data to this analysis at any timepoint. In this follow-on study, not all subjects are eligible for all visits.
CCT is a measurement of the thickness of the cornea at its center and is assessed using a procedure called corneal pachymetry. A high CCT (thick cornea) indicates a central cornea thicker than average and may be associated with conditions such as corneal edema, Fuchs' dystrophy, or ocular hypertension. A low CCT (thin cornea) indicates a central cornea thinner than average and may be a risk factor for developing conditions such as glaucoma. A negative change value indicates a decrease in corneal thickness. This analysis was performed using data from the COMPASS study and data from the COMPASS XXT study. No hypothesis was prespecified for this outcome measure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass
n=54 eyes
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Lumen Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
Collar Only
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
1 Ring
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
2 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
3 Rings
CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Change from Baseline at Month 96 (Year 8)
|
1.9 microns
Interval -18.6 to 22.3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Change from Baseline at Month 108 (Year 9)
|
0.0 microns
Interval -7.1 to 7.1
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change in Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) From COMPASS Trial Baseline Visit Reported by Mean and 95 Percent Confidence Interval
Change from Baseline at Month 120 (Year 10)
|
4.1 microns
Interval -3.4 to 11.5
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Cataract Surgery + CyPass - Ocular Adverse Events
Cataract Surgery + CyPass - Systemic Adverse Events
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass - Ocular Adverse Events
n=54 participants at risk
Adverse events reported in this group occurred in the study eye
|
Cataract Surgery + CyPass - Systemic Adverse Events
n=54 participants at risk
Adverse events reported in this group occurred systemically and include adverse events in the non-study eye
|
|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Visual Acuity Reduced
|
18.5%
10/54 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/54 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post Procedural Complication
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Visual Field Defect
|
3.7%
2/54 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Trabeculectomy
|
3.7%
2/54 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Trabeculoplasty
|
0.00%
0/54 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Cataract Surgery + CyPass - Ocular Adverse Events
n=54 participants at risk
Adverse events reported in this group occurred in the study eye
|
Cataract Surgery + CyPass - Systemic Adverse Events
n=54 participants at risk
Adverse events reported in this group occurred systemically and include adverse events in the non-study eye
|
|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss
|
11.1%
6/54 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual Acuity Reduced
|
25.9%
14/54 • Number of events 14 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Device Placement Issue
|
5.6%
3/54 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post Procedural Complication
|
7.4%
4/54 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Visual Field Defect
|
33.3%
18/54 • Number of events 18 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time of consent (COMPASS XXT) until time of study exit (COMPASS XXT), from 1 day to 2 years depending on point of enrollment.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects. Safety was assessed at each visit. The Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event table reports only the AEs that occurred above a 5% threshold in one or more arms.
|
Additional Information
Director, Clinical Projects - CDMA Surgical
Alcon Research, LLC
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Sponsor reserves the right of prior review of any publication or presentation of information related to the study.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER