Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
83 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-11-20
2023-03-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Music Over the Tolerance to Colonoscopy.
NCT01285284
Effect of Functional Relaxation on Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
NCT01963858
Effectiveness and Safety of the Colonoscopy With "Visualization" Balloon
NCT02117232
A Validated Educational Video Intervention Improves the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT02013505
Virtual Reality Colonoscopy : a Study From Nancy
NCT05203978
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Colorectal cancer is the third most common diagnosed cancer in the United States and is second only to lung cancer in number of deaths. Widespread adoption of colorectal cancer screening has resulted in earlier detection as well as reduction in mortality. Colonoscopy, compared to other methods of screening has additional benefit in its ability to prevent the development of colon cancer through removal of precancerous polyps.Besides it being considered the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening, colonoscopy is an essential tool for diagnostic evaluation for a wide range of gastrointestinal complaints.Despite the proven success of colorectal cancer screening programs and public understanding of its importance, there remains a gap in adherence. In a recent study, about 64% of eligible patients received CRC screening within the past 10 years, which is far behind the "80% by 2018"target. Besides colonoscopy, alternative tools have been developed in an effort to improve adherence to screening including fecal immunochemical testing and fecal DNA testing. However, these tests still have low sensitivity for advanced adenomas of 24% and 42%, respectively, and lack the added benefit of colonoscopy for prevention of development of colon cancer.Patients often experience feelings of anxiety and anticipated discomfort both prior to and during the procedure; one study reported greater than 50% of patients have moderate to severe anxiety about undergoing the procedure. These concerns regarding an anticipated unpleasant experience deter some patients for whom the procedure is indicated from undergoing this valuable test.Sedation is administered during the procedure to alleviate patient discomfort, but this is associated with potential adverse effects, especially if increasing doses are required in response to increased discomfort or anxiety.Sources of patient anxiety about colonoscopy include the necessary bowel preparation,fear of embarrassment, pain, potential complications, sedation, and the potential of a diagnosis of cancer.This anxiety can increase pain perception in patients: a key predictor of pain during colonoscopy is a patient's pre-procedural anxiety level.This anxiety and pain can manifest in the need for increased sedation, increased length of procedure, and reduced patient satisfaction.One way to improve the patient experience that has been investigated is reduced volume bowel preparations. But, prior studies have also suggested that music during a colonoscopy can significantly improve patient satisfaction, reduce anxiety and pain, and reduce the total sedation medication requirement
The performance of gastroenterologists is measured by quality factors such as adenoma detection rate and adenomas per colonoscopy. A number of techniques have been studied to improve these parameters, including use of colonoscope caps and second looks on the right side of the colon and right-sided retroflexion. Additionally, prior studies have suggested improvement from music being played in the endoscopy suite. An intervention that is inexpensive and without adverse effects that can potentially improve the patient experience and as a consequence hypothetically adherence to screening programs, and improve endoscopist performance, would be expected to be widely adopted. Yet, use of music during colonoscopy is inconsistent and there are no society guidelines or recommendations regarding its use. Potential reasons for this include a sense of a lack of adequate body of evidence and inconsistency in the method of administration.The investigators aim to provide more convincing data to support or refute the benefit of music during colonoscopy to aid the decision on whether routinely offering music during the procedure should be considered a standard of care.
Objectives/Aims:
The investigators' aim is to assess whether playing music during a colonoscopy procedure improves the patient experience and willingness to undergo the procedure again(measured on a Likert scale), improves endoscopist performance (as measured by adenoma detection rate and time to reach cecum), and reduces the mean dose of sedatives required during the procedure (both midazolam and fentanyl).Secondary endpoints include reduction in pain,total procedure time, and withdrawal time.The delay between the time the procedure was scheduled for and the time the procedure actually commenced will also be measured, as long delays are a not uncommon occurrence that can separately negatively impact the patient experience and therefore this variable maybe used for post-hoc analysis. The investigators anticipate the study to take place over the course of 1 year.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Music
Colonoscopy
Music vs. No-Music
No-Music
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Colonoscopy
Music vs. No-Music
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Outpatient
* Undergoing colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, or diagnostic purposes
* Procedure is to be performed solely by an attending gastroenterologist
* Sedation plan is moderate sedation (midazolam, fentanyl, and/or diphenhydramine administered by RN)
Exclusion Criteria
* Inpatients
* Deafness or hearing loss requiring use of hearing aids
* Patient is prescribed and taking opiate pain medications or benzodiazepine anxiety medications
* Previous history of colon cancer
* Previous history of colon resection
* History of incomplete or aborted colonoscopy procedures
* Participation of an anesthesia professional for administration of monitored anesthesia care of general anesthesia
* ASA PS Classification \> 4
* Double procedures (EGD \& Colonoscopy)
* A gastroenterology fellow will be participating in the procedure
* Endoscopist cancels the colonoscopy before scope insertion (most commonly due to believing the prep is inadequate or a contraindication identified)
* Minors, and non-English speaking subjects will be excluded.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Illinois at Chicago
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Asim Shuja
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Asim Shuja, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Illinois at Chicago
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Berkowitz Z, Zhang X, Richards TB, Nadel M, Peipins LA, Holt J. Multilevel Small-Area Estimation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Mar;27(3):245-253. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0488.
Song LL, Li YM. Current noninvasive tests for colorectal cancer screening: An overview of colorectal cancer screening tests. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Nov 15;8(11):793-800. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i11.793.
Yang C, Sriranjan V, Abou-Setta AM, Poluha W, Walker JR, Singh H. Anxiety Associated with Colonoscopy and Flexible Sigmoidoscopy: A Systematic Review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;113(12):1810-1818. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0398-8. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
Hsueh FC, Chen CM, Sun CA, Chou YC, Hsiao SM, Yang T. A Study on the Effects of a Health Education Intervention on Anxiety and Pain During Colonoscopy Procedures. J Nurs Res. 2016 Jun;24(2):181-9. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000112.
Bashiri M, Akcali D, Coskun D, Cindoruk M, Dikmen A, Cifdaloz BU. Evaluation of pain and patient satisfaction by music therapy in patients with endoscopy/colonoscopy. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018 Sep;29(5):574-579. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.18200.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020-0548
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.