Cognitive Intervention and Rehabilitation Outcomes in Hip Fracture Patients
NCT ID: NCT04626934
Last Updated: 2023-04-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-01
2024-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Tele-rehabilitation Intervention for People Post Hip Fracture - Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
NCT03376750
Contextual Interference, Engagement , and Change in Motor Performance in Stroke
NCT05342688
Motor Activity and Its Barriers at the Early Phase Post-stroke in Acute Care Setting.
NCT04540978
The Relationship Between Pet Therapy and "Well-being" in Geriatric Rehabilitation In-patients
NCT01234844
Objective Assessment of Upper Extremity Functioning of Stroke Patients Before and After Rehabilitation
NCT02092662
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One of the most challenging tasks of today's post-acute geriatric rehabilitation wards is improving the functional abilities of fragile hip-fractured patients and discharging most of them to their homes. Yet, the rising incidence of hip fractures in the elderly has created an overwhelming workload on those departments and has significantly increased the burden on healthcare resources. Previous studies have found that cognitive decline is an important negative predictor in rehabilitation. Several studies have shown that cognitive interventions can improve functional abilities of older people. Yet, these studies were conducted in community dwelling older people. Our study will assess this issue amongst post-acute rehabilitation hip fracture patients. Our hypotyhesis is that those patients recieving specific cognitive intervention will show significantly better rehabilitation outcomes and cognitive function.
The objective of the present study is to assess whether specific cognitive intervention will influence rehabilitation outcomes of post-acute hip fracture patients.
This is a randomized double blinded study. We will compare two groups: one will recieve specific cognitive intervention and a control group will recieve conventional occupational therapy treatment. Both groups will recieve the same amount of interventions.The interventions will include all together 12 sessions, each being 45 minutes, for a total of 3 weeks. The intervention will include: 4 treatments in the area of memory and attention, 4 treatments in the area of problem solving, 4 treatments in the area of planning and analysing.
Patients in the control group will recieve conventional occupational therapy treatment: 3 weeks of all together 12 sessions, 45 minutes each.
The outcome measures are: a disability measure, the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the motor FIM, the Montebello Rehabilitation Factor Score (MRFS), also called motor FIM effectiveness. In addition 4 cognitive functional measures: the Color Trail Test, the Kettle Test, the Groningen Activity Restriction Skill (GARS), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA).
The randomization process will be carried out by withdrawing a piece of paper written either A (intervention) (n=10) or B (control) (n=10) from an envelope. The subjects will not be informed as to which group they will be assigned. Patient recruitment and the randomization process will be supervised by the clinical staff. The assessors will be blinded to the type of intervention.
Statistical analysis will be performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).
The study sample size was estimated using the mean and the standard deviation of the motor FIM measure (calculated for this population), with improvement assumption by 7 points, with power of 0.8 and significance level of 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
control group
Patients in the control group will recieve conventional occupational therapy treatment: 3 weeks of all together 12 sessions, 45 minutes each.
conventional occupational therapy treatment
The intervention will include all together 12 sessions of conventional occupational therapy treatments, each being 45 minutes, for a total of 3 weeks.
Intervention group
The intervention will include all together 12 sessions, each being 45 minutes, for a total of 3 weeks. The intervention will include: 4 treatments in the area of memory and attention, 4 treatments in the area of problem solving, 4 treatments in the area of planning and analysing.
specific cognitive intervention
The intervention will include all together 12 sessions, each being 45 minutes, for a total of 3 weeks. The intervention will include: 4 treatments in the area of memory and attention, 4 treatments in the area of problem solving, 4 treatments in the area of planning and analysing.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
specific cognitive intervention
The intervention will include all together 12 sessions, each being 45 minutes, for a total of 3 weeks. The intervention will include: 4 treatments in the area of memory and attention, 4 treatments in the area of problem solving, 4 treatments in the area of planning and analysing.
conventional occupational therapy treatment
The intervention will include all together 12 sessions of conventional occupational therapy treatments, each being 45 minutes, for a total of 3 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
65 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tel Aviv University
OTHER
Rabin Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
AVITAL HERSHKOVITZ
Head, Geriatric Rehabilitation Ward
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Avital Hershkovitz, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rabin MC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
"Beit- Rivka" geriatric rehabilitation hospital
Petach Tiqva, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Adam S, Godlwana L, Maleka D. Changes in short-term cognitive function following a hip fracture in the elderly and the effect of cognitive function on early post-operative function. SA Orthopaedic Journal 2016;15:77-82.
Oughli HA, Chen G, Philip Miller J, Nicol G, Butters MA, Avidan M, Stark S, Lenze EJ. Cognitive Improvement in Older Adults in the Year After Hip Fracture: Implications for Brain Resilience in Advanced Aging. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;26(11):1119-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.07.001.
Beloosesky Y, Grinblat J, Epelboym B, Weiss A, Grosman B, Hendel D. Functional gain of hip fracture patients in different cognitive and functional groups. Clin Rehabil. 2002 May;16(3):321-8. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr497oa.
Rolland Y, Pillard F, Lauwers-Cances V, Busquere F, Vellas B, Lafont C. Rehabilitation outcome of elderly patients with hip fracture and cognitive impairment. Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Apr 8;26(7):425-31. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001663148.
Gruber-Baldini AL, Hosseini M, Orwig D, Grattan L, Chiles Shaffer N, Hochberg M, Magaziner J. Cognitive Differences between Men and Women who Fracture their Hip and Impact on Six-Month Survival. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Mar;65(3):e64-e69. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14674. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
Mizrahi EH, Harel N, Heymann AD, Lubart E, Leibovitz A, Malik Gadot E, Barkan RB. The relation between gain in cognition during rehabilitation on functional outcome among hip fracture adult patients with and without pre- hip fracture dementia. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Sep-Oct;78:177-180. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, Jobe JB, Leveck MD, Marsiske M, Morris JN, Rebok GW, Smith DM, Tennstedt SL, Unverzagt FW, Willis SL; Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Study Group. Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002 Nov 13;288(18):2271-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2271.
Lipardo DS, Tsang WW. Effects of combined physical and cognitive training on fall prevention and risk reduction in older persons with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Jun;34(6):773-782. doi: 10.1177/0269215520918352. Epub 2020 May 7.
Lipardo DS, Tsang WWN. Falls prevention through physical and cognitive training (falls PACT) in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Aug 24;18(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0868-2.
Reijnders J, van Heugten C, van Boxtel M. Cognitive interventions in healthy older adults and people with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2013 Jan;12(1):263-75. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
Willis SL, Tennstedt SL, Marsiske M, Ball K, Elias J, Koepke KM, Morris JN, Rebok GW, Unverzagt FW, Stoddard AM, Wright E; ACTIVE Study Group. Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. JAMA. 2006 Dec 20;296(23):2805-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.23.2805.
Heruti RJ, Lusky A, Barell V, Ohry A, Adunsky A. Cognitive status at admission: does it affect the rehabilitation outcome of elderly patients with hip fracture? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Apr;80(4):432-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90281-2.
Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, et al. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer MJ, editor. Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement. Baltimore: Paul H Brooks Publishing Co; 1987. p 137-47.
Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1992. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Feb;73(1):51-5. No abstract available.
Hartman-Maeir A, Erez AB, Ratzon N, Mattatia T, Weiss P. The validity of the Color Trail Test in the pre-driver assessment of individuals with acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2008 Dec;22(13-14):994-8. doi: 10.1080/02699050802491305.
Messinis L, Malegiannaki AC, Christodoulou T, Panagiotopoulos V, Papathanasopoulos P. Color Trails Test: normative data and criterion validity for the greek adult population. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Jun;26(4):322-30. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr027. Epub 2011 May 9.
Hartman-Maeir A, Harel H, Katz N. Kettle test--a brief measure of cognitive functional performance. Reliability and valdity in stroke rehabilitation. Am J Occup Ther. 2009 Sep-Oct;63(5):592-9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.63.5.592.
Harper KJ, Llewellyn K, Jacques A, Ingram K, Pearson S, Barton A. Kettle test efficacy in predicting cognitive and functional outcomes in geriatric rehabilitation. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Apr;66(2):219-226. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12540. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
Giambelluca E, Panigazzi M, Saade A, Imbriani M. Assessment of functional status and rehabilitative strategies in occupational therapy: role of the Groningen Activity Restriction Questionnaire. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2019 Mar;41(1):52-57.
Kempen GI, Miedema I, Ormel J, Molenaar W. The assessment of disability with the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale. Conceptual framework and psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1996 Dec;43(11):1601-10. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00057-3.
Markwick A, Zamboni G, de Jager CA. Profiles of cognitive subtest impairment in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a research cohort with normal Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012;34(7):750-7. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2012.672966. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.
Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982-1983;17(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0465-20-RMC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.