Family Assessment Motivation, and Linkage Intervention (FAMLI)

NCT ID: NCT04604236

Last Updated: 2023-09-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-07-07

Study Completion Date

2023-04-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The R34 study will integrate existing tools for use with JJ populations and examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a caregiver-youth intervention aimed at increasing SU treatment initiation. The adaptive intervention incorporates three evidence-based components: 1) assessment of motivation and linkage-related barriers with personalized feedback, 2) Mapping-Enhanced Counseling (MEC) for improving readiness for change and interpersonal communication, and 3) Active Linkage (AL) for addressing logistical barriers to service initiation. Youth-caregiver dyads will be randomly assigned to receive an initial dose (2, 1-hr sessions) of either MEC or AL. After 30 days, participants will be classified as Responders (1 or more services initiated) or Non-responders (no service initiation). All participants will be randomized to one of two intervening interventions: an additional dose (2, 1-hr sessions) of the initial intervention (MEC or AL) or a different dose (2, 1-hr sessions of the other). The specific aims are to 1) integrate and adapt appropriate evidence-based intervention components as a dyadic intervention approach for JJ youth and caregivers; 2) test the feasibility, acceptability, and optimal configuration of the dyadic intervention components and the protocol used to evaluate effectiveness (including feasibility of recruitment, implementation, measurement); and 3) preliminarily explore a) whether an initial dose of MEC or AL is sufficient for promoting early initiation and engagement, b) whether an additional dose of MEC or AL or a change in dose is more effective, and c) which component sequence is most effective. Primary outcomes include youth (initiation of assessment or counseling; counseling attendance) and caregiver (attendance at assessment, first counseling, and/or family sessions) measures. Secondary outcomes include youth and caregiver attitudes (problem recognition, desire for help), normative beliefs (SU norms), perceived control (stressors and obstacles), and youth SU (self-report corroborated by UA results). The study addresses the sizeable gap in service receipt among JJ youth by addressing family engagement, and focuses on improving motivation to change, linkage to services, and treatment engagement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mapping Enhanced Counseling (MEC) Active Linkage (AL)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mapping Enhanced Counseling (MEC)

MEC will target attitudes and norms. Attitudes include motivation for change, such as problem recognition and a belief that treatment will help. Subjective norms include normative beliefs about SU in adolescence (e.g., belief that it is ok to allow SU with parental supervision; experimentation is normal) and expectations about treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mapping Enhanced Counseling

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Practitioner-led, collaborative discussion with the youth and their caregiver on co-creating guide maps for decision making around starting treatment and continuing substance use that can help users organize information and think through a series of steps, questions, and behavior choices. encountered when attempting to initiate substance use treatment services. MEC is a communication and decision-making approach that uses graphic visualization tools to train individuals to monitor and control their decision making, improve judgment and behavioral choices (self-regulation), and improve communication and mutual understanding.

Active Linkage (AL)

AL will target perceived control. Perceived control includes perceived logistical barriers and the degree to which individuals feel they can overcome them.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Active Linkage

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Practitioner-led, collaborative discussion with the youth and their caregiver on how to overcome barriers encountered when attempting to initiate substance use treatment services. Discussion focuses around the top barriers identified through assessment and identification of 1 or more treatment agency/options that fit the family's needs. Practitioner takes a more active role in addressing barriers to treatment by helping the family find ways to access resources for payment, childcare, or other needs, and actively linking them to the treatment provider (e.g., scheduling the initial appointment with family present).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mapping Enhanced Counseling

Practitioner-led, collaborative discussion with the youth and their caregiver on co-creating guide maps for decision making around starting treatment and continuing substance use that can help users organize information and think through a series of steps, questions, and behavior choices. encountered when attempting to initiate substance use treatment services. MEC is a communication and decision-making approach that uses graphic visualization tools to train individuals to monitor and control their decision making, improve judgment and behavioral choices (self-regulation), and improve communication and mutual understanding.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Active Linkage

Practitioner-led, collaborative discussion with the youth and their caregiver on how to overcome barriers encountered when attempting to initiate substance use treatment services. Discussion focuses around the top barriers identified through assessment and identification of 1 or more treatment agency/options that fit the family's needs. Practitioner takes a more active role in addressing barriers to treatment by helping the family find ways to access resources for payment, childcare, or other needs, and actively linking them to the treatment provider (e.g., scheduling the initial appointment with family present).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* pre or post adjudicated or deferred prosecution
* have an identified SU need within the past 12 months (confirmed by the TCU Drug Screen-5 during initial assessment)
* speak English
* no indication of active suicide risk
* can identify one parent/guardian/responsible adult (caregiver) that is willing to participate who speaks Spanish or English
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Texas Christian University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

DanicaKnight

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Danica Knight, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Texas Christian University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Texas Christian University

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R34DA049079-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Linkage to Care - Part I
NCT00703040 COMPLETED