Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) Precision Medicine Phase 2 Option 1

NCT ID: NCT04602806

Last Updated: 2025-04-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-01

Study Completion Date

2030-04-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is being conducted to validate early and ultra-early blood-based and novel imaging biomarkers of Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI), Microvascular Injury (MVI), and neuroinflammation that may serve as predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers in a new cohort of moderate-severe TRACK-TBI subjects. The study team will enroll a cohort of moderate to severe TBI subjects (N=50), stratified according to VA/DoD criteria for these injury severities through the existing TRACK-TBI network sites to obtain novel advanced neuroimaging and more frequent biomarker sampling. Subjects will be assessed over 3 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In 2009, the multicenter Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Consortium was implemented to characterize the clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and blood-based biomarker features of TBI to inform design of next-generation precision medicine clinical trials in TBI. Over the past 10+ years, TRACK-TBI has been supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Department of Defense (DoD), Department of Energy (DoE), the National Football League, and other philanthropic and industry partners. TRACK-TBI has enrolled \>3000 control and TBI subjects across the injury spectrum at 18 US Level 1 Trauma Centers. This effort has established the world's largest collection of TBI imaging studies and bio-specimens. The study results are already being adopted into clinical research and bedside practice. The TRACK-TBI Consortium is now primed to deliver on critical military and public health knowledge gaps and needs: objective classification of TBI based on what is termed as "mechanistic" endophenotypes, e.g., diffuse axonal injury (DAI), microvascular injury (MVI), and neuroinflammation. An endophenotype is an internal phenotype discoverable by biochemical, physiological, radiological, pathological, or other techniques, which is intermediate between a complex phenotype and the presumptive genetic or environmental contribution to a disease. Endophenotypes are quantitative, continuous variables, unlike a phenotype which is usually a binary, categorical variable. These mechanistic endophenotypes, defined by imaging and blood-based biomarkers, will direct targeted treatments based on mechanism, providing the tools needed for successful execution of precision medicine clinical trials. To achieve the goal of precision medicine in TBI, it is necessary to identify subgroups of TBI patients that will respond to a targeted therapy. Investigators will assess putative blood-based and neuroimaging biomarkers for DAI, MVI, and neuroinflammation. Fluid biomarkers complement imaging markers and may provide important tools for precision medicine clinical trials. Investigators will collect acute data (early and ultra-early i.e., hours-days following injury), to validate the utility of these biomarkers in defining TBI mechanistic endophenotypes for use in clinical trials.

Specific Aim for TRACK-TBI Precision Medicine Phase 2-Option 1: To validate early and ultra-early blood based and novel imaging biomarkers of DAI, MVI, and neuroinflammation that may serve as predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers in a cohort of moderate-severe subjects.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Traumatic Brain Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Moderate to Severe TBI Subjects

Adult patients (age 18-65y inclusive) presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with a history of acute TBI as per American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (ACRM) Criteria (i.e., patient has sustained a traumatically-induced physiological disruption of brain function).

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 - 65y inclusive
* History or evidence of TBI, according to DoD-VA criteria
* Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 3 - 15 after resuscitation in the ED
* Head CT with evidence of trauma-related abnormality (except for isolated epidural hematoma (EDH))
* Ability to undergo MRI within 48 hours of injury
* Ability to obtain informed consent from participant or Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) within 6 hours of injury
* Fluency in English or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria

* Unstable respiratory or hemodynamic status
* Evidence of penetrating brain injury
* Isolated EDH as only trauma-related CT abnormality
* Systemic traumatic injury that would preclude participation in study, which is expected to result in long-term disability not related to TBI
* Evidence of serious infectious complications (sepsis, bacteremia, multilobar pneumonia)
* Acute ischemic heart disease (myocardial infarction or unstable angina)
* History of syncope or hypotension
* Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \< 90 mm Hg, Diastolic blood pressure (DBP)\< 40 mm Hg for longer than 5 minutes
* History or evidence of active malignancy
* History of pre-existing neurologic disorder, such as dementia, mild cognitive impairment, uncontrolled epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, strokes, brain tumors, prior severe TBI, or other disorder that may confound interpretation of MRI or neuropsychological results
* History of pre-existing disabling mental illness, such as major depression or schizophrenia
* History or evidence of chronic heart failure or chronic renal failure
* Low likelihood of follow-up (e.g., participant or family indicating low interest, residence in another state or country, unhoused or lack of reliable contacts)
* Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding
* Prisoners or patients in custody
* Patients on psychiatric hold (e.g. 5150, 5250)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Geoffrey T Manley, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of California, San Francisco

Claudia S Robertson, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Baylor College of Medicine

David O Okonkwo, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Pennsylvania

Nancy R Temkin, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Washington

Pratik Mukherjee, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of California, San Francisco

Joseph T Giacino, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Murray B Stein, MD, MPH

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of California, San Diego

Mike McCrea, PhD, ABPP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical College of Wisconsin

Ramesh Grandhi, MD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Utah

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

University of Pennsylvania/Penn Presbyterian Medical Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Medical College of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Maas AI, Roozenbeek B, Manley GT. Clinical trials in traumatic brain injury: past experience and current developments. Neurotherapeutics. 2010 Jan;7(1):115-26. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.10.022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20129503 (View on PubMed)

Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1976;34(1-4):45-55. doi: 10.1007/BF01405862.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 961490 (View on PubMed)

Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998 Aug;15(8):573-85. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.573.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9726257 (View on PubMed)

Maas AI, Harrison-Felix CL, Menon D, Adelson PD, Balkin T, Bullock R, Engel DC, Gordon W, Orman JL, Lew HL, Robertson C, Temkin N, Valadka A, Verfaellie M, Wainwright M, Wright DW, Schwab K. Common data elements for traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the interagency working group on demographics and clinical assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1641-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.232.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21044707 (View on PubMed)

Manley GT, Diaz-Arrastia R, Brophy M, Engel D, Goodman C, Gwinn K, Veenstra TD, Ling G, Ottens AK, Tortella F, Hayes RL. Common data elements for traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the biospecimens and biomarkers working group. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1667-72. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.05.018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21044710 (View on PubMed)

Duhaime AC, Gean AD, Haacke EM, Hicks R, Wintermark M, Mukherjee P, Brody D, Latour L, Riedy G; Common Data Elements Neuroimaging Working Group Members, Pediatric Working Group Members. Common data elements in radiologic imaging of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1661-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.238.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21044709 (View on PubMed)

Whyte J, Vasterling J, Manley GT. Common data elements for research on traumatic brain injury and psychological health: current status and future development. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1692-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.031.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21044713 (View on PubMed)

Almasy L, Blangero J. Endophenotypes as quantitative risk factors for psychiatric disease: rationale and study design. Am J Med Genet. 2001 Jan 8;105(1):42-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11424994 (View on PubMed)

O'Neil ME, Carlson KF, Storzbach D, Brenner LA, Freeman M, Quinones AR, Motu'apuaka M, Kansagara D. Factors associated with mild traumatic brain injury in veterans and military personnel: a systematic review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Mar;20(3):249-61. doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000204.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24622505 (View on PubMed)

Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X, Gunther M, Hendrikse J, Hernandez-Garcia L, Lu H, MacIntosh BJ, Parkes LM, Smits M, van Osch MJ, Wang DJ, Wong EC, Zaharchuk G. Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Jan;73(1):102-16. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25197. Epub 2014 Apr 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24715426 (View on PubMed)

Dikmen S, Machamer J, Miller B, Doctor J, Temkin N. Functional status examination: a new instrument for assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2001 Feb;18(2):127-40. doi: 10.1089/08977150150502578.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11229707 (View on PubMed)

McCrea M, Kelly JP, Randolph C. Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC): Manual for Administration, Scoring and Interpretation. 2nd ed. Waukesha, WI: CNS Inc; 2000. [Google Scholar]

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Smith GP, Burger GK. Detection of malingering: validation of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1997;25(2):183-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9213290 (View on PubMed)

Reitan, R.M. and D. Wolfson, The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Vol. 4. 1985: Reitan Neuropsychology.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Finkelstein E, Corso P, Miller T and Associates. The Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://fitbir.nih.gov/content/access-data

Access to FITBIR data will be according to FITBIR policies.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

W81XWH-18-2-0042

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TRACK-TBI Longitudinal Biomarker Study
NCT05201833 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING