Comparison of Cross Pin Configurations in Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Treatment: 2 Pins Versus 3 Pins
NCT ID: NCT04582123
Last Updated: 2020-10-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-15
2020-01-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pediatric Type III Supracondylar Humeral Fracture
NCT04780308
Management of Displaced Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus Using Lateral vs. Crossed K-wires
NCT00358787
Type II Supracondylar Fractures in Children
NCT00207870
Treatment of Type I Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus
NCT00904137
Type II Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Management and Outcomes: A Prospective Multi-centre Cohort Study
NCT02963233
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Intervention: Twentytwo patients were managed by 2 crossed and 23 by 3 crossed pin method. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon.
Main Outcome Measurements: Postoperative stability, ulnar nerve injury, range of motions, and pin tract infections were evaluated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
comparison of two cross pin fixation methods
Fixation of supracondylar humerus fractures with 2 crossed pins and 3 crossed pins are compared in terms of Flynn's criteria
crossed pin configuration
comparison of two crossed pin fixation methods
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
crossed pin configuration
comparison of two crossed pin fixation methods
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
1 Year
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014/250
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.