Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
152 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-10
2026-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In recent studies, it was shown that a more advanced type of esophageal probe (ensoETM) that cools the esophagus during ablation is better at protecting the esophagus from ablation-related injury compared to the standard care temperature monitoring probe currently used. The ensoETM is a CE marked and FDA-cleared device, with an intended purpose of controlling patient temperature and has received marketing authorization from FDA to reduce the likelihood of ablation-related esophageal injury resulting from radiofrequency cardiac ablation procedures.
The purpose of this study is to determine if the long-term efficacy outcome results obtained in single pilot studies can be replicated in a prospective, multi-center randomized controlled trail comparing the the esophageal cooling probe versus a standard of care esophageal temperature monitoring probe. There is a 50:50 chance of the esophageal cooling probe being used during AF ablation for participants.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Esophageal Cooling for AF Ablation
NCT03691571
Esophageal Cooling in Radiofrequency Cardiac Ablation
NCT03481023
Improving Oesophageal Protection During AF Ablation
NCT03819946
Early Detection and Treatment of Esophageal Injury After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
NCT00584922
Evaluating Active Esophageal Cooling During Cardiac Ablation Procedures
NCT04063761
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
At present, the method of protection is limited; an esophageal temperature monitoring probe is inserted whilst the patient is under general anesthesia and the temperature is measured during ablation, stopping if temperatures markedly increase, which may suggest significant esophageal thermal injury. This method is unreliable as the temperature probe does not sit well in the esophagus and is often too far away from the area requiring monitoring. The probe is difficult to place as it can coil.
The esophageal cooling device (ensoETM) is another protection method that is gaining popularity since receiving marketing authorization from FDA to reduce the likelihood of ablation-related esophageal injury resulting from radiofrequency cardiac ablation procedures. While the acute safety data has been accepted, long-term efficacy outcomes improvements with use of ensoETM has not been confirmed outside of single center randomized studies.
The design of the project is in the form of a randomized controlled trial like the single-center studies, so participants will have a 50:50 chance of being allocated to the study group receiving the esophageal cooling probe (ensoETM) or to the control group, receiving the esophageal temperature monitoring probe.
The patient is blinded to the result of the randomization, to avoid bias/placebo effect.
If enrolled to the study group, the esophageal cooling probe (ensoETM) will be used. This is a smooth medical-grade silicone multi-lumen esophageal probe (the device has a CE mark and FDA clearance and is designed for the purpose of esophageal insertion and temperature management) that allows water irrigation in a closed loop system, when connected to an external console. If the console cools the irrigated water (this is controlled by manual up/down buttons depending on what temperature is desired), the esophageal probe is then cooled also, which allows local esophageal wall temperature to be controlled. Esophageal cooling via the ensoETM probe can then counteract any transmitted thermal energy from the ablation. The ensoETM has already received marketing authorization from FDA to reduce the likelihood of ablation-related esophageal injury resulting from radiofrequency cardiac ablation procedures.
The ablation procedure is normally done under general anesthetic so the participant will not be aware of what group they are assigned and will not be subjected to any sensation of pain or discomfort. The ensoETM probes are soft and much gentler than the camera probe that the team normally have to insert during the catheter ablation procedure (the camera probe or transesophageal echocardiography, TEE- is part of standard care), so the study authors are of the opinion that this additional precautionary measure does not itself increase the patient's risk or exposure to harm.
After the procedure, participants (study or control) may have an optional endoscopy camera between 12-72 hours after the catheter ablation procedure to review for degree of esophageal thermal damage caused by ablation, if any. The endoscopist is also blinded to the result of the randomization to avoid bias during reporting of the endoscopy result. The short time window between ablation and endoscopy camera follow up means that it can be done at the same admission as the ablation procedure itself, this is advantageous for the patient as both the ablation treatment and the follow up camera can be completed in 1 hospital admission. The endoscopy camera result is explained to the patient on the day and if any further action required.
After this, normal/standard care clinic follow up of the patient will be adhered to but as part of the trial, at the first clinic follow up, participants in both groups will be asked about any lingering gastro-esophageal symptoms and a record is made of this, for the study. The patient is still blinded to the results of the randomization at the time of reporting their symptoms during recovery, if any. This is to avoid bias/placebo effect.
The research project does not create any areas of ethical concern as the soft esophageal cooling device/probe is of gentle design, specifically made to sit in the esophagus. Especially when compared to the TOE probe that is normally used as part of standard protocol for an AF ablation procedure. The patient will also not be aware of this step at all as the procedure is conducted under general anesthesia. The device is appropriately CE marked and FDA cleared for the indication of body cooling via the esophagus and with marketing authorization to reduce the likelihood of ablation-related esophageal injury resulting from radiofrequency cardiac ablation procedures. Even in standard care, an esophageal temperature monitoring probe is required, so effectively, this study simply randomizes the patient to either the esophageal cooling probe or another standard of care probe, during their AF ablation.
There is one additional optional follow up the participant may have, as part of this trial: the endoscopy camera (regardless of if randomized to study or control group). The endoscopy camera will be completed by 12-72hrs post catheter ablation procedure. The purpose is to review any areas of inflammation or thermal injury in the esophagus that may alter clinical management but this specific information will also be used during study analysis of the 2 randomized groups after the study has completed. An endoscopy camera is considered to be a low risk outpatient procedure that takes 20 minutes to complete. The risk of this camera test causing any damage itself is \<0.5%. A TEE probe/any other esophageal probe used during the ablation procedure is similar to the endoscopy probe so apart from the participant attending an additional optional appointment after their ablation, the overall risk to the patient is not significantly increased.
The follow up endoscopy camera may be slightly uncomfortable in the beginning but it is not painful, is straightforward and relatively quick- this will be explained in the beginning during the recruitment process so the potential participant has an accurate idea of what to expect from the endoscopy camera if they choose to get this procedure. There is added benefit to the patient from this follow up, as the endoscopy camera will confirm to the patient about any esophageal injury from ablation and if any treatment is required. If no injury, this can help to reassure the patient before they go home.
Lastly, the follow up clinics will be as normal for the participant, only that investigators will ask specifically for any ongoing gastroesophageal symptoms as well. A record of this will be made.
The study authors reviewed the steps involved with this study design and concluded that no major ethical or legal issue has been identified. The summary of the steps involved here hopefully clarifies our viewpoint. From a management perspective, the centers involved are able to conduct catheter ablation procedures for AF with general anesthetic. The authors have experience and acquired the necessary equipment from the esophageal cooling device company and have appropriate device management protocols and storage space in place. The endoscopy department at the participating centers are also equipped to support additional follow up with endoscopy tests post ablation.
Lastly, the proposed research trial has been similarly conducted in single-site settings to great success and with excellent safety record with no probe-related trauma and the team did not encounter any new or unexpected issues or difficulties. The authors obtained good patient feedback from the single-center studies. This same trial will run at 5 or more sites across the US with potential to further expand depending on statistical analysis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
This study includes an optional endoscopy. The endoscopist who performs the upper GI (gastrointestinal) endoscopy camera after the ablation procedure, is also blinded to the randomization.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study group
Those randomized to the study group will receive the esophageal cooling device- the ensoETM probe, during AF ablation treatment, under general anaesthetic. The cooling device is set to 4 degrees Celsius during ablation of the left atrial posterior wall.
ensoETM. Esophageal cooling during AF ablation
Esophageal cooling during AF ablation: The ensoETM probe is inserted via the orogastric route when the patient is under general anesthesia. The device is set to cool during ablation of the posterior aspect of the left atrium, to protect against transmitted thermal energy and so reduce or prevent esophageal thermal injury.
Control group
Those randomized to the control group will receive standard of care, which is an esophageal temperature monitoring probe during their AF ablation procedure, under general anesthetic. The esophageal temperature probe is placed close to the level of ablation (the probe should be at the esophageal level where, opposite this, the ablation catheter is at, in the endocardial aspect of the posterior left atrium).
Esophageal temperature monitoring probe
An esophageal temperature monitoring probe is a typical monitoring device used in standard of care AF ablations. This allows any temperature rise in the esophagus to be detected during ablation. If the temperature reaches \>38 degrees then it is widely recognized that ablation should be halted until the temperatures fall back to below 38 degrees. It therefore has the ability to detect esophageal temperature rise only.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ensoETM. Esophageal cooling during AF ablation
Esophageal cooling during AF ablation: The ensoETM probe is inserted via the orogastric route when the patient is under general anesthesia. The device is set to cool during ablation of the posterior aspect of the left atrium, to protect against transmitted thermal energy and so reduce or prevent esophageal thermal injury.
Esophageal temperature monitoring probe
An esophageal temperature monitoring probe is a typical monitoring device used in standard of care AF ablations. This allows any temperature rise in the esophagus to be detected during ablation. If the temperature reaches \>38 degrees then it is widely recognized that ablation should be halted until the temperatures fall back to below 38 degrees. It therefore has the ability to detect esophageal temperature rise only.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Those in extremities of age (\<18 or \>85) will not be recruited.
* AF patients scheduled to have a radiofrequency AF ablation under local anesthesia
* Patients who have received a left atrial ablation procedure within the last 90 days. • • Patients enrolled in another clinical trial that might impact participation in this trial.
* \*\* For patients electing to undergo the optional endoscopy, no contraindications to endoscopy should be present
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Pennsylvania
OTHER
Berry Consultants
OTHER
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
OTHER
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
OTHER
Kansas City Cardiac Arrhythmia Research LLC
UNKNOWN
Advanced Cooling Therapy LLC, d/b/a Attune Medical
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Callans, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pennsylvania
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
NCH Research Institute
Naples, Florida, United States
Kansas City Cardiac Arrhythmia Research LLC
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
Austin, Texas, United States
St.George's Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Leung LW, Gallagher MM, Santangeli P, Tschabrunn C, Guerra JM, Campos B, Hayat J, Atem F, Mickelsen S, Kulstad E. Esophageal cooling for protection during left atrial ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;59(2):347-355. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00661-5. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
Leung LW, Gallagher MM. Esophageal cooling for protection: an innovative tool that improves the safety of atrial fibrillation ablation. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Oct;17(10):981-982. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1824674. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
Leung LWM, Gallagher MM. Letter in reply to Gianni et al on "Prevention, diagnosis, and management of atrioesophageal fistula". Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;43(11):1417-1418. doi: 10.1111/pace.14012. Epub 2020 Sep 3. No abstract available.
Zagrodzky J, Gallagher MM, Leung LWM, Sharkoski T, Santangeli P, Tschabrunn C, Guerra JM, Campos B, MacGregor J, Hayat J, Clark B, Mazur A, Feher M, Arnold M, Metzl M, Nazari J, Kulstad E. Cooling or Warming the Esophagus to Reduce Esophageal Injury During Left Atrial Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation. J Vis Exp. 2020 Mar 15;(157). doi: 10.3791/60733.
Bir LS, Kuruoglu HR. Jitter measurement by axonal microstimulation in cervical radiculopathy. Muscle Nerve. 1998 Nov;21(11):1563-4. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199811)21:113.0.co;2-z. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
851998
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.