Reinterpretation of CNV With Unknown Significance: a 5-year Retrospective Analysis

NCT ID: NCT04575350

Last Updated: 2020-10-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

282 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We aim to assess the usefulness of systematic reinterpretation of CNV of unknown significance. To investigate this question we will study all CNV of unknown significance detected between 2010 and 2017.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Array-CGH is a front-line technique in many genetic indications in both prenatal and postnatal settings. It allows the detection of chromosomal rearrangements (duplication or deletion for example) in routine. The interpretation and classification of these copy number variations or CNVs is essential but complex. It requires a systematic and methodical analysis of the variation in the context of the scientific literature. When these revisions do not meet either pathogenicity or benignity criteria, they are referred to as variation of unknown significance (or VUS). They account for a significant proportion of the revisions up to 75% (Palmer et al., 2013).

The detection of VUS does not, in most cases, allow for a diagnosis and often requires the use of other, costly techniques. The human impact may also be significant in the absence of possible genetic counselling (e.g. in the context of a future pregnancy). Reanalysis of an VUS is of major interest for at least two reasons : (1) the first, if it is classified as benign, makes it possible to close the investigation of the variant, to consider other leads without ulterior motives, and to reassure the patient about the absence of pathogenicity of the variant. (2) if the VUS is ultimately pathogenic, this makes it possible to name the disease for the patient, to specify genetic counselling, to avoid further long and costly investigation and possibly to propose treatment.

Currently, VUS can be reanalysed by the laboratory at the request of the prescribing physician or possibly another physician. However, no systematic reanalysis procedure is currently in place.

Although these variations of unknown meanings are frequent and represent an important issue, to our knowledge, no systematic database study has been carried out. Some similar work has nevertheless been carried out over a shorter period or on an ad hoc basis, showing an interest in this type of approach (Palmer et al., 2014).

Indeed, it seems essential to determine the interest of reanalysing such variations in several modes: diagnostic, economic and human.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Genetic Disease CNV Genetic Counseling Array CGH

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cohort

no intervention.

reinterpretation of CNV

Intervention Type GENETIC

Reinterpretation of CNV of unknown significance

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

reinterpretation of CNV

Reinterpretation of CNV of unknown significance

Intervention Type GENETIC

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Signed consent for array-CGH (authorization for the conservation of a biological sample and its subsequent use to continue investigations);
* array-CGHcarried out at the genetics laboratory in Nancy between 1st January 2010 and 31th December 2017 (considering the date of validation of the report);
* Identification of variations of unknown clinical significance.

Exclusion Criteria

* none
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Central Hospital, Nancy, France

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Laetitia LAMBERT

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lambert Laƫtitia, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHRU Nancy, Lorraine University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lorraine University

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Palmer E, Speirs H, Taylor PJ, Mullan G, Turner G, Einfeld S, Tonge B, Mowat D. Changing interpretation of chromosomal microarray over time in a community cohort with intellectual disability. Am J Med Genet A. 2014 Feb;164A(2):377-85. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36279. Epub 2013 Dec 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24311194 (View on PubMed)

Ravel JM, Renaud M, Muller J, Becker A, Renard E, Remen T, Lefort G, Dexheimer M, Jonveaux P, Leheup B, Bonnet C, Lambert L. Clinical utility of periodic reinterpretation of CNVs of uncertain significance: an 8-year retrospective study. Genome Med. 2023 May 23;15(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13073-023-01191-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37221613 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ReAC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.