Reinterpretation of CNV With Unknown Significance: a 5-year Retrospective Analysis
NCT ID: NCT04575350
Last Updated: 2020-10-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
282 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-01-01
2020-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Risk of Recurrence of de Novo Mutations: Research and Quantification of Paternal Germinal Mosaicism by the Combined Use of Genomic Tools
NCT04564235
Nephronophthisis : Clinical and Genetic Study
NCT01022957
Observational Study of Advanced Data Analytics in Genetic Conditions
NCT05657405
Prospective Study to Assess Medical Performance of Optical Mapping and Long Read Sequencing in Detecting Numerical and Structural Chromosome Abnormalities
NCT05290051
Use of Omics Methods to Classify Variations of Uncertain Significance and Improve Diagnosis of Neurogenetic Diseases
NCT06955624
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The detection of VUS does not, in most cases, allow for a diagnosis and often requires the use of other, costly techniques. The human impact may also be significant in the absence of possible genetic counselling (e.g. in the context of a future pregnancy). Reanalysis of an VUS is of major interest for at least two reasons : (1) the first, if it is classified as benign, makes it possible to close the investigation of the variant, to consider other leads without ulterior motives, and to reassure the patient about the absence of pathogenicity of the variant. (2) if the VUS is ultimately pathogenic, this makes it possible to name the disease for the patient, to specify genetic counselling, to avoid further long and costly investigation and possibly to propose treatment.
Currently, VUS can be reanalysed by the laboratory at the request of the prescribing physician or possibly another physician. However, no systematic reanalysis procedure is currently in place.
Although these variations of unknown meanings are frequent and represent an important issue, to our knowledge, no systematic database study has been carried out. Some similar work has nevertheless been carried out over a shorter period or on an ad hoc basis, showing an interest in this type of approach (Palmer et al., 2014).
Indeed, it seems essential to determine the interest of reanalysing such variations in several modes: diagnostic, economic and human.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cohort
no intervention.
reinterpretation of CNV
Reinterpretation of CNV of unknown significance
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
reinterpretation of CNV
Reinterpretation of CNV of unknown significance
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* array-CGHcarried out at the genetics laboratory in Nancy between 1st January 2010 and 31th December 2017 (considering the date of validation of the report);
* Identification of variations of unknown clinical significance.
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Central Hospital, Nancy, France
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Laetitia LAMBERT
Dr
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lambert Laƫtitia, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHRU Nancy, Lorraine University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lorraine University
Nancy, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Palmer E, Speirs H, Taylor PJ, Mullan G, Turner G, Einfeld S, Tonge B, Mowat D. Changing interpretation of chromosomal microarray over time in a community cohort with intellectual disability. Am J Med Genet A. 2014 Feb;164A(2):377-85. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36279. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
Ravel JM, Renaud M, Muller J, Becker A, Renard E, Remen T, Lefort G, Dexheimer M, Jonveaux P, Leheup B, Bonnet C, Lambert L. Clinical utility of periodic reinterpretation of CNVs of uncertain significance: an 8-year retrospective study. Genome Med. 2023 May 23;15(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13073-023-01191-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ReAC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.