Decompressive Craniectomy Following Trauma

NCT ID: NCT04574349

Last Updated: 2020-10-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-01

Study Completion Date

2021-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A prospective clinical trial on trauma patients with increased intracranial pressure(ICP) applied for decompressive craniectomy to lower ICP

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a major health problem across the globe . Intracranial pressure (ICP) following TBI can be elevated due to increasing mass effect from hematomas, contusions, and diffuse brain swelling. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a surgical procedure which involves removing a large part of the skull (bone flap) out to make more room for the swollen brain.Mass lesions can be acute subdural hematoma (ASDH), intraparenchymal, brain oedema, or a combination thereof. The most frequent indication for a DC is an acute subdural hematoma (ASDH). The first modern use of DC following TBI was done by Harvey Cushing in 1908. Cushing treated head-injured patients with a subtemporal DC and he reported a substantial reduction in mortality. The management of TBI progressed significantly in the 21st century due to advances in neuroimaging, prehospital management, neurointensive care, neuroanaesthesia, and rehabilitation. This led to a renaissance of interest in DC for improvement patient conditions. One of the serious concerns regarding DC is that it may reduce mortality, but increase the subset of patients with severe disability and persistent vegetative state. The discrepancy in published outcome may, to some extent, be explained by difference in patient selection, indications, timing , and technique of surgery. In terms of surgical consideration regarding DC, it is now well accepted that the dura mater has to be opened and the minimum diameter of unilateral DC should be around 11-12 cm. Skull reconstruction (cranioplasty) after improvement of neurological state is recommended. Decompressive craniectomy provides additional space for the swollen brain and can effectively reduce ICP, thereby mitigating the risk of herniation. However, despite the positive effect of DC on uncontrollable intracranial hypertension, the effect of surgical decompression in mortality and overall functional outcome following TBI remained controversial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Head Injury Trauma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Decompressive craniectomy

Removing part of the skull (bone flap) to lower intracranial pressure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All Patients with signs of increased intracranial tension (subdural hematoma, brain edema, intracerebral hematoma) after trauma diagnosed clinically, radiologically, and resistant to medical decompression.
* Age: up to 60
* Midline shift more than 5 mm.
* GCS \> 8

Exclusion Criteria

* Age: more than 60
* Old trauma
* Unfit for surgery (ex: cardiac patient)
* GCS \< 8
* Midline shift less than 5 mm.
* Unwillingness to participate in the study.
Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alaa Eldeen Mohamed Oreaby Adam

Assistant Lecturer at neurosurgery department, Assiut University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roshdy A Elkhayat, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assiut University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assiut University

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alaa M Oreaby

Role: CONTACT

01008798181

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

1. Wilson MH, Kolias AG, Hutchinson PJ. Neurotrauma - a multidisciplinary disease. Int J clic pract 2014;68:5-7. 2. Kolias AG, Kirkpatrick PJ, Hutchinson PJ. Decompressive craniectomy: past, present, and future. Nat Rev Neurol 2013;9:405-15. 3. Sahuquillo J, Arikan F. Decompressive craniecomty for the treatment of refractory high intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;CD003983. 4. Cushing G. I. subtemporal Decompressive Opertions for the intracranial Complications Associated with Bursting Fractures of the Skull. Ann Surg 1908;47:641-4.1 5. Polin RS, Shaffrey ME, Bogaev, et al. Decompressive bifrontal craniectomy in the treatment of severe refractory posttraumatic cerebral edema. Neurosugery 2015;41:84-92. 6. Whitfield PC, Patel H, Hutchinson PJ, et al. Bifrontal decompressive craniectomy in the management of posttraumatic intracranial hypertension. Br J Neurosurg 2014;15:500-7. 7. De luca GP, Volpin L, Fornezza U, Cervellini P, Zanusso M, Casentini L, Curri D, Piacentino M, Bozzato G, Colombo F, The role of decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of uncontroolable pos-traumatic intracranial hypertension. Acta Neurichir (Suppl) 2000;76:401-404. 8. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. & Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 2014;39, 175-191.. 9. I. Timofeev, P.J.Kirkpatrick, E.Corteen, M.Hiller, M.Czosnyka, D.K.Menon, J.D.Pickard, and P.J.Hutchinson Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury 2006;96:11-16 10. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. Lancet 1974; 81-84 11. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury. Acta Neurochir 1976; 34:45-55.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Decompressive craniectomy

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.